Joined: Feb 2007
From: Im a Medical Officer in /K. I'm here to lepak.
Go get this Entry Level DSLR from Singapore Pentax - for less than RM2500~ Weather sealed (THE ONLY ONE RIGHT NOW) around this price~ Challenge this K-30 for Value for money~!!
EOS M come with kit lens... there is no need to buy adapter up front...
the camera is for TG gf (IMO most females prefer smaller body).. from the specs.. alot of similarity to the 650D...
if TS will buy a DSLR for himself in the future, he can invest in the Canon Ecosystem.... then can buy the adapter if his GF want to share glasses...
in the future if TS is to invest in a RM10k 5Dmk3, i don't think he will mind trading in his existing EF-S glasses (btw, I wrote EF lens... not EF-S lens )
from the way you posted, you look like you're saying get adapter upfront.
You'll see a link EF lens line-up. It covers both EF and EF-S. That's why I had to add on, that if using EF-S lenses then one would still have to upgrade.
later the GF come back argue say buy Nikon mirrorless then susah liao. hehe.
If Canon is your choice, go for something higher than 1100D, like 600D. Chances are once you're get familiar with DSLR photography, you'll see a lot of limitations in 1100D vs others.
and yet Jerry Ghionis went from Canon to Nikon. Rocco Ancora also Nikon. Louis Pang also Nikon. CM Leung also Nikon. Lito Sy also Nikon ......... so how?
and yet Jerry Ghionis went from Canon to Nikon. Rocco Ancora also Nikon. Louis Pang also Nikon. CM Leung also Nikon. Lito Sy also Nikon ......... so how?
GF reply : "Are you saying they are right? Or are you going to listen to me?"
Ps: My GF won't argue already, she still want Canon, said that Canon color is more solid.
hope this posting wont cause problem btwn you and your GF, if she fix her mind to canon, just get it, but you might want to wait for upcoming model then consider buying 1100D, as said canon cant let nikon D3200 take the beginner camera market, dun fool by the megapixes, but on the price, weight, fps (if you shooting sports quite often) i can even add in sony alpha and tell you they have one of the fastest fps camera currently, straight buy wha is in your mind and take it as an investment...
IMO, if you want to compare, do take D3200 to compare with d7000 then you onli see the difference...but d3200 is a new model, d5100 is a worth buy also, as its class is above d3xxx series, since both around the same price, just go for any model will do, but both dun have build in motor as d7000 and d90 does...dun get brainwash by the 24mp on the d3200, do you really need the 24mp picture, or you need a 5meter by 5meter picture print?
if you have budget around 3k, get a d7000, you wont regret it...
I'm actually a Canon user but I would say go for Nikon. To be honest at the entry level it doesn't make too much difference. The difference seems to be much more noticeable closer to the higher end of the scale.
If you don't plan to be very serious with your photography, I would say go with whatever feels better in your hand/price/image tone preference. Also helps if you have friends with different lenses you can experiment with!
On the flip side if you think you will eventually get more serious and develop your hobby, it then comes down to what you want to use it for.
When I shoot weddings, there are often times where I require a high ISO under low light in which my Canon 5dmkiii excels in. But then sometimes when I shoot street fashion photography out in broad daylight that high ISO is not needed and therefore there is more of an even argument between a Canon or a Nikon. If I was to do portrait photography in a studio where I require high megapixels, I would then consider the Nikon over Canon.