QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 28 2012, 06:16 PM)
i got 3.5m retractable ruler, now just need to find 10m+ space for me to focus Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.16
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.16
|
|
Jun 28 2012, 06:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2012, 07:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jun 28 2012, 06:56 PM) thats when laser range finder comes in handy, not really need focus to infinity, just sometime street photography is useful to get more area in focus so i can snap and rundirect tell distance btw, it is really hard to do hyperfocal especially your aperture not small enough, at long range. |
|
|
Jun 28 2012, 08:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 28 2012, 07:51 PM) Lol so sorry I misunderstood you because your question wasn't clear i did that and most of the time end up blur image That is why I recommended you a range finder or not it would be impossible for you to guess the range of your subject!.. If you want to use it for street photography go google zone focusing and later on use a random subject you want to take and make a few test shots, after youre comfortable with what you have do set your auto focus to manual now you can head to the streets! |
|
|
Jun 29 2012, 03:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jun 29 2012, 01:26 AM) Can roughly gauge what distance you are focusing. Just look at the focusing distance screen on the lens. Don't need to be exact. there is no focus distance on my lensIf you're into street photography, get a wide angle like 24mm and set aperture f/8. Shoot any subject at distance roughly 2x your height assuming you're an average 5+ feet in height. Note that 24mm lens on a DX body is not so wide. 35mm lens would be even harder for street on DX if you're into hyperfocal technique. Agito666. I use it too on my D300 before getting FX body. Hey, is that a new 1.75x crop factor Nikon DX body you're using? I think you meant 28-70mm = 42-105mm... i dont always shoot street, only when i go out with my camera i normally shoot half body for landscape and full body for portrait on my 35mm, framing isn't a big deal for me since i get used to the focal length already |
|
|
Jun 29 2012, 11:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jun 29 2012, 11:03 AM) Not bad for sports too. DX mode gives 16MP, 6fps with grip and almost full coverage for the AF points. Superb... *damn kena brainwashed by my friend at Super GT* 16mp still sufficient and still can crop a lot, if not for printing 16mp is very good because in the end upload to facebook will be resize to 2048 long edge btw...i saw someone post about architecture photography copyrights infringement in one of my facebook group and the story goes like this » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « basically the person go to one of the bridge in The Curve there for a photoshoot, that's a famous spot for photoshoot because of the background and environment. then a guard come and say they are infringing the architecture copyrights by taking photos of their properties while in the picture it does not really reveal the building design since it is more like some full body portraits so question there, is the guard has the rights to stop us from taking photograph of that particular "structure"/place? or maybe they got some other secret reason that stop us from taking photos in that section? photoshoot in public places should not be a problem and it is not against any laws/rules unless stated or as long as the photoshoot session does not disturb anyone right? and shopping mall should be consider as public place which mean we are allow to take photos since we are in public places and as long as we do not commercially distribute the photos? i'm bad in laws, but i just want to know this basic laws to protect myself |
|
|
Jun 29 2012, 11:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 29 2012, 11:23 AM) the bridge? as in inside? then the guard has every right to stop since it is considered private property. what about right outside of the bridge? i'm not sure where is the location of the bridge leh, never went there before QUOTE(ongdennis @ Jun 29 2012, 11:24 AM) i also get warning before by the security guard when i take picture at the lobby of twin tower. but he still sound ok n tell me that if for personal use then is ok... yeah...in suria KLCC they even put up a signboard throughout the shopping mall saying that no photographing of the places and distribute itso many using compact camera n phone to snap around but they just ignore, because i hanging dslr then come n warning me >.<''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2012, 11:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 29 2012, 11:33 AM) the bridge is on top 1st floor connecting. i see, but doing so is violating architectural copyrights rights but intrusion of private properties? so if they not inside, then they shooting on the road. imagine one day some ppl go shoot portraits outside ur house...what will u do? they shooting on public road...but ur house is the background if i'm not mistaken malaysia laws is still following UK laws? |
|
|
Jun 29 2012, 03:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 29 2012, 02:41 PM) On 2nd note anyone going for WPPM this coming August? everyone include newbie also can join?I went for it last year and had a tons of fun, learnt many things and made many friends! Who wants to tag along? Added on June 29, 2012, 2:51 pmTheres Jom Photo too tomorrow at titiwangsa park!! Best of all it's free to anyone and everyone! I won't be going for that thou, got a wedding to shoot in a church ;D |
|
|
Jun 29 2012, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 29 2012, 03:41 PM) i mean the WPPM that one |
|
|
Jun 30 2012, 12:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 29 2012, 10:36 PM) If the date is right I'll definitely go!! Want to see speaker too! Hopefully got CM! Cause August may go krabi! Hopefully they post full details ASAP >.< why suddenly everyone want to go krabi, my sister ask me whether i want to go there at the end of december, and one of my friend just back from krabi not long ago @_@ |
|
|
Jul 2 2012, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2012, 10:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 3 2012, 07:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(eugene88 @ Jul 2 2012, 10:55 PM) macro is just marketing gimmick because they are only 1:2 magnification unlike the true macro lens which can do 1:1 magnificationactually 55-300mm also can go to 1:2 magnification, i think most of the tele zoom lens also can do it |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 3 2012, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jul 3 2012, 09:51 AM) Strongly suggest to exchange if you still can (but they might not allow). Basically they're trying to clear off the Sigma or those old lenses. not to mention to get a stable at 300mm handheld without VR/OS will need at least 1/250s or faster shutter, been there, tried it with my 55-300 without VR handheld and the result is disappointingSome sigma lens does come with macro capability, which means, at least 1:3 magnification or higher. It's not true macro as in 1:1, it's not a macro lens, it never said it is, but it's like a bonus with some macro capability. I guess some people don't really understand the magnification, even with macro lens, it doesn't mean when you shoot, you always get 1:1 magnification. For this Sigma, tough, to get 1:3 magnification, you probably need to zoom to maximum and get to the closest focusing distance. maybe my hand is too shaky |
|
|
Jul 3 2012, 11:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(onscreen @ Jul 3 2012, 11:17 AM) If @ 300mm and cant do 1/250s, the person need to relearn on how to do elbow to chest bracing and sniping breathing control. I handheld 300mm f/2.8 and can do 1/200s you have to take the physical condition of the body, duration of shooting/event into consideration as well laQUOTE(Andy214 @ Jul 3 2012, 11:23 AM) With 55-300mm, definitely, the lens is so light and it'll shake so badly. Go Nikon Center at BTS and try the 80-200mm f/2.8 or 70-200mm f/2.8, the heavy lens will give way better balance and way less shake; I have shaky hands, but with the 80-200mm, I can handheld at 1/30s @ 200mm, albeit not all shots are spot on. Changed to 55-300 @ 200mm, gosh, it's super shaky. tried calvin seak 70-200 2.8 on his D800, definitely more stable, but hand get tired faster as well btw....my 55-300 when zoom from around 55-250mm the zoom action is smooth, from 250-300 is feel tighter and not smooth feel a bit tight, is it zoom ring got problem? This post has been edited by amduser: Jul 3 2012, 11:58 AM |
|
|
Jul 3 2012, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#96
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 4 2012, 07:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#97
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(andrewtyy @ Jul 4 2012, 01:43 AM) I feel like to take macro photography, currently not enough budget for a macro len and check out that wide + close up filter can get in few hundreds. So would like to seek advises from everyone that is it wise to buy close up filter? or just save for a macro len better? If it is worthy, which 1 should I buy? Thanks. not out of focus but shallow depth of fieldOnly having 18-105mm and have a stable tripod, few gear only as I'm still a student. Some of your photo are soft or out of focus, just my 2 cents. I'm newbie too. |
|
|
Jul 5 2012, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#98
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jul 5 2012, 01:46 PM) dont worry you will learn along the way You PP on the girl? Added on July 5, 2012, 1:46 pm Same xD But rarely go :/ ![]() Nikon walkabout Malaysia 23/6/2012 by Calvin Seak, on Flickr Spam beach pictures summer time!! xD |
|
|
Jul 5 2012, 04:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#99
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 6 2012, 10:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#100
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.3041sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:09 AM |