Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.16

views
     
amduser
post Jun 28 2012, 06:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 28 2012, 06:16 PM)
You need to find the subject distance to put in to the equation as well thats what it is for
*
i got 3.5m retractable ruler, now just need to find 10m+ space for me to focus sweat.gif
amduser
post Jun 28 2012, 07:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jun 28 2012, 06:56 PM)
thats when laser range finder comes in handy,
direct tell distance  brows.gif

btw, it is really hard to do hyperfocal especially your aperture not small enough,
at long range.
*
not really need focus to infinity, just sometime street photography is useful to get more area in focus so i can snap and run
amduser
post Jun 28 2012, 08:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 28 2012, 07:51 PM)
Lol so sorry I misunderstood you because your question wasn't clear
That is why I recommended you a range finder or not it would be impossible for you to guess the range of your subject!..

If you want to use it for street photography

go google zone focusing and later on use a random subject you want to take and make a few test shots, after youre comfortable with what you have do set your auto focus to manual now you can head to the streets!
*
i did that and most of the time end up blur image doh.gif
amduser
post Jun 29 2012, 03:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jun 29 2012, 01:26 AM)
Can roughly gauge what distance you are focusing. Just look at the focusing distance screen on the lens. Don't need to be exact.
If you're into street photography, get a wide angle like 24mm and set aperture f/8. Shoot any subject at distance roughly 2x your height assuming you're an average 5+ feet in height.

Note that 24mm lens on a DX body is not so wide. 35mm lens would be even harder for street on DX if you're into hyperfocal technique.
Agito666.

I use it too on my D300 before getting FX body.
Hey, is that a new 1.75x crop factor Nikon DX body you're using?  tongue.gif

I think you meant 28-70mm = 42-105mm...
*
there is no focus distance on my lens

i dont always shoot street, only when i go out with my camera

i normally shoot half body for landscape and full body for portrait on my 35mm, framing isn't a big deal for me since i get used to the focal length already
amduser
post Jun 29 2012, 11:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jun 29 2012, 11:03 AM)
Not bad for sports too. DX mode gives 16MP, 6fps with grip and almost full coverage for the AF points. Superb... *damn kena brainwashed by my friend at Super GT*
*
16mp still sufficient and still can crop a lot, if not for printing 16mp is very good because in the end upload to facebook will be resize to 2048 long edge laugh.gif

btw...i saw someone post about architecture photography copyrights infringement in one of my facebook group and the story goes like this

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


basically the person go to one of the bridge in The Curve there for a photoshoot, that's a famous spot for photoshoot because of the background and environment.

then a guard come and say they are infringing the architecture copyrights by taking photos of their properties while in the picture it does not really reveal the building design since it is more like some full body portraits

so question there, is the guard has the rights to stop us from taking photograph of that particular "structure"/place?

or maybe they got some other secret reason that stop us from taking photos in that section?

photoshoot in public places should not be a problem and it is not against any laws/rules unless stated or as long as the photoshoot session does not disturb anyone right?

and shopping mall should be consider as public place which mean we are allow to take photos since we are in public places and as long as we do not commercially distribute the photos?

i'm bad in laws, but i just want to know this basic laws to protect myself
amduser
post Jun 29 2012, 11:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 29 2012, 11:23 AM)
the bridge? as in inside? then the guard has every right to stop since it is considered private property.
*
what about right outside of the bridge? i'm not sure where is the location of the bridge leh, never went there before

QUOTE(ongdennis @ Jun 29 2012, 11:24 AM)
i also get warning before by the security guard when i take picture at the lobby of twin tower. but he still sound ok n tell me that if for personal use then is ok...
so many using compact camera n phone to snap around but they just ignore, because i hanging dslr then come n warning me >.<'''
*
yeah...in suria KLCC they even put up a signboard throughout the shopping mall saying that no photographing of the places and distribute it

amduser
post Jun 29 2012, 11:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 29 2012, 11:33 AM)
the bridge is on top 1st floor connecting.
so if they not inside, then they shooting on the road.

imagine one day some ppl go shoot portraits outside ur house...what will u do?
they shooting on public road...but ur house is the background tongue.gif
*
i see, but doing so is violating architectural copyrights rights but intrusion of private properties? hmm.gif

if i'm not mistaken malaysia laws is still following UK laws?
amduser
post Jun 29 2012, 03:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 29 2012, 02:41 PM)
On 2nd note anyone going for WPPM this coming August?

I went for it last year and had a tons of fun, learnt many things and made many friends!

Who wants to tag along? biggrin.gif


Added on June 29, 2012, 2:51 pmTheres Jom Photo too tomorrow at titiwangsa park!!

Best of all it's free to anyone and everyone!

I won't be going for that thou, got a wedding to shoot in a church ;D
*
everyone include newbie also can join?
amduser
post Jun 29 2012, 05:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 29 2012, 03:41 PM)
i mean the WPPM that one
amduser
post Jun 30 2012, 12:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jun 29 2012, 10:36 PM)
If the date is right I'll definitely go!! Want to see speaker too! Hopefully got CM! Cause August may go krabi! Hopefully they post full details ASAP >.<
*
why suddenly everyone want to go krabi, my sister ask me whether i want to go there at the end of december, and one of my friend just back from krabi not long ago @_@

amduser
post Jul 2 2012, 11:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(BenSow @ Jul 2 2012, 01:00 AM)
But then today I was working on my PC and I simply edit this with HDR and it looks pretty good to me. lol. Forgot the settings -_________-

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
doesn't look hdr at all hmm.gif
amduser
post Jul 2 2012, 10:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(eugene88 @ Jul 2 2012, 10:18 PM)
Yeah..
I wanted to buy Nikon 55-300mm at first but the salesman offered me this lens lol
Guess I have to live with it then  wink.gif
*
sigma lens not as good as nikon lens la, i have no regret going for 55-300mm

tele lens is better with VR/OS
amduser
post Jul 3 2012, 07:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(eugene88 @ Jul 2 2012, 10:55 PM)
zzz that means the salesmen cheat me?
But this lens got macro which Nikon don't have?
*
macro is just marketing gimmick because they are only 1:2 magnification unlike the true macro lens which can do 1:1 magnification

actually 55-300mm also can go to 1:2 magnification, i think most of the tele zoom lens also can do it
amduser
post Jul 3 2012, 10:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jul 3 2012, 09:51 AM)
Strongly suggest to exchange if you still can (but they might not allow). Basically they're trying to clear off the Sigma or those old lenses.

Some sigma lens does come with macro capability, which means, at least 1:3 magnification or higher. It's not true macro as in 1:1, it's not a macro lens, it never said it is, but it's like a bonus with some macro capability. I guess some people don't really understand the magnification, even with macro lens, it doesn't mean when you shoot, you always get 1:1 magnification.
For this Sigma, tough, to get 1:3 magnification, you probably need to zoom to maximum and get to the closest focusing distance.
*
not to mention to get a stable at 300mm handheld without VR/OS will need at least 1/250s or faster shutter, been there, tried it with my 55-300 without VR handheld and the result is disappointing

maybe my hand is too shaky tongue.gif
amduser
post Jul 3 2012, 11:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(onscreen @ Jul 3 2012, 11:17 AM)
If @ 300mm and cant do 1/250s, the person need to relearn on how to do elbow to chest bracing and sniping breathing control. I handheld 300mm f/2.8 and can do 1/200s biggrin.gif
*
you have to take the physical condition of the body, duration of shooting/event into consideration as well la

QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jul 3 2012, 11:23 AM)
With 55-300mm, definitely, the lens is so light and it'll shake so badly. Go Nikon Center at BTS and try the 80-200mm f/2.8 or 70-200mm f/2.8, the heavy lens will give way better balance and way less shake; I have shaky hands, but with the 80-200mm, I can handheld at 1/30s @ 200mm, albeit not all shots are spot on. Changed to 55-300 @ 200mm, gosh, it's super shaky.
*
tried calvin seak 70-200 2.8 on his D800, definitely more stable, but hand get tired faster as well laugh.gif

btw....my 55-300 when zoom from around 55-250mm the zoom action is smooth, from 250-300 is feel tighter and not smooth feel a bit tight, is it zoom ring got problem? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by amduser: Jul 3 2012, 11:58 AM
amduser
post Jul 3 2012, 12:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(leonghan @ Jul 3 2012, 12:03 PM)
Hi,
how is the IQ between 55-300VR and 70-300VR ??
55-300VR price below RM1k right?? but 70-300VR around RM1.8k and over my budget  ohmy.gif
*
70-300 is fx lens while 55-300 is dx so 55-300 is cheaper, optics i guess i roughly the same

but 70-300 VR got IF ED
amduser
post Jul 4 2012, 07:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(andrewtyy @ Jul 4 2012, 01:43 AM)
I feel like to take macro photography, currently not enough budget for a macro len and check out that wide + close up filter can get in few hundreds. So would like to seek advises from everyone that is it wise to buy close up filter? or just save for a macro len better? If it is worthy, which 1 should I buy? Thanks. smile.gif
Only having 18-105mm and have a stable tripod, few gear only as I'm still a student.

Some of your photo are soft or out of focus, just my 2 cents. I'm newbie too. blush.gif
*
not out of focus but shallow depth of field
amduser
post Jul 5 2012, 02:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jul 5 2012, 01:46 PM)
dont worry you will learn along the way


Added on July 5, 2012, 1:46 pm

Same xD But rarely go :/

user posted image
Nikon walkabout Malaysia 23/6/2012 by Calvin Seak, on Flickr

Spam beach pictures summer time!! xD
*
You PP on the girl? hmm.gif
amduser
post Jul 5 2012, 04:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(eugene88 @ Jul 5 2012, 04:32 PM)
The seller tell me that APO means got stabilizer and he said that telephoto lens sure got shake even with Nikon's VR zz
*
will have shake since VR is just help to reduce vibration while not totally eliminate it
amduser
post Jul 6 2012, 10:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 6 2012, 08:05 AM)
Haih, the girls wants shots like this nowadays sad.gif Big head no longer in demand >_<
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
i also like pic like this more than those distorted big head pic tongue.gif

9 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.3041sec    0.36    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:09 AM