Melacca got place for exotic birds??

Nope... I think have a bird park gua... LOL!
No need to change bad habit. Just change to 24-70mm f/2.8 lens !
I think the 28-70mm f/2.8 still commands a good 2nd hand price.
<ahem, ahem> With a 1.2x crop, he can get away with very slight vignetting when using DX lens on FX body at FX mode.
Yes it is. Best of both worlds.
Wah, your friend shot with a D800 during the Super GT? Any samples?
3x TC? New one from Nikon ah?
Who lah?
Agreed. Just like KLCC. Last time, outside KLCC also the guards do this. Is it still the same now?
But stopping and giving reasons of intellectual property is quite far fetch. I believe in Malaysia, only KLCC nighttime view has some kind of IP. Same like Eiffel Tower in Paris granted that there is such kind of rule stipulated officially on their website.
http://www.eiffel-tower.com/faq.htmlI think threatening a million ringgit libel suite against a small time photographer is just lame. Especially not when you shoot for private collection. I would suggest that if anyone happens to be in that situation, ask them to go ahead and engage their lawyers to send you a letter of demand. See if they care enough and have enough time to do it or not.
Yup, that's right. Because hanging a DSLR that says Nikon or Canon on the strap will automatically make you a pro. No?
There's a limit to how much you can amplify that defies the laws of physics. Even Nikon puts extra glass elements in their newest 2x TCEIII.
I'll put funny stuff in the background and see if they continue to shoot.
Anyway, I think there's a line drawn for residential houses where people live in and have their privacy's respected. What kind of privacy or rule is violated if you take photos at the Curve bridge as a backdrop?