QUOTE(Alvinyeo @ May 23 2012, 10:48 AM)
One of the reason from auction house switch to High Court because the property got no bidders for quite some time.
Usually High court will pay all outstanding fees and reserve price more cheaper.

Totally wrong advice mate. High courts deal with properties with proper title or those that has already been stratafied. Auction house deals with master titled properties, or properties whose titles have yet to perfected.
Depending on the security documents the bank has on the borrower, they will dictate on how the auction should be carried out. Even if the property has been stratafied but the title has yet to be perfected, then only LACA can be done. High court will not accept such properties. In fact LACA is not without risks and if anything, anyone who is inexperience should avoid LACA and go for high court auction only as the risks are a lot (and i mean A LOT) lower for high court auction.
1 year plus ago, a lot of high court auctions do not pay for outstanding fees. It is only recently that they standardise the POS across west malaysia, that we find POS telling us the bank will pay for outstandings inclusive of maintenance and utilities. If you read National Land Code, the bank is NOT oblige to pay such outstandings. They are required only to pay quit rent and assessment and anything that the government wants, not private.
Valuation is not cheaper on high court. It is the same. House A will cost X amount of money in both LACA and high court. Valuers will give two values on a property. OMV (open market value) and FSV (forced sale value). FSV is usually 10% off the OMV.
Added on May 23, 2012, 11:12 amQUOTE(RedBishop @ May 23 2012, 10:48 AM)
auction house is better than high court from what i think
Not true. Please read the above.
This post has been edited by michaellee: May 23 2012, 11:12 AM