from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_AMOLED
HD Super AMOLED is a new Super AMOLED type display from Samsung. The first device to use it is the Galaxy Note: an Android v2.3 phone with a 5.3" 1280x800 display. The phone (and the display) was announced in September 2011. The second device to use it is Samsung's Galaxy Nexus phone - with a 4.65" display with 1280x720 resolution. The higher resolution and dpi were made possible due to a change in materials and new manufacturing process, though still using shadow mask (or fine metal mask (FMM)) technology. However this required a change back to pentile RGBG subpixels.

the front view... acceptable... but the back @@''
nid a decent casing >.<

yes, similar to what you said...

back to the S3 'design'... i think this is the first time i have to say that i'd prefer a WHITE version. the white version definitely looks waaaAAAAAaay better than the blue/ black.

yea... i get wat u mean... but most of the gal... back  view ... but go infront have a closer look 
back to the phone... I predict its around ... 2199! btw the design I kinda like it... slim bezel... means smaller in phone size but bigger in screen size 

This is how Samsung forces us to spend money mah...

Maybe the Plus (non-Pentile) display is not ready for HD yet 

force us get s3 rather than letting us use that software on s2 or something else

I mean, if Samsung's cheaper phones, e.g. Galaxy Y has all those extra features, who want to buy S III?

tat was the most BS thing I heard from samseng
I actually hear  from a lot of sgs user I personally know, and also on forms around the net that sgs with ics is actually smoother than any other version they have ever had in their phone  

I guess its all bcoz they have got a million phones out last year and cant release ics for all of it. So they give BS excuses

if a new SII is only around RM1k or less with ICS, i will take it anytime over the SIII for my wife as she does not need so powerful phone.

thinking again.... the only things that make me wanna go s3 than HOX is the unlocked bootloader and design.....

what you guys think?

so.... will u get it when S3 available ?? lets make a poll 

I am just wondering, performance wise, can Huawei Ascend D Quad XL beat SGSIII?

lol.. you got me there.    But i already have the Note - got used to the chunky screen size, not going to anything smaller than that.
just get the Note, believe me, you will get addicted to the screen size in no time.    If you think SIII is the best, Note definitely is the second best at the moment.

Sell also hard...no value...."What? China phone?? Offer RM100!!!". At least, with SGS3, it has solid reputation and better market value in the long run.

Er...i don't think so....this phone more like SGS2S rather than SGS3...design nothing to shout about...SGS2 looks better actually.

I wonder what is the significance of having either a plastic body or non-plastic body when most users are gonna use hand phone casing?

The brilliance of Apple is marketing...they sell you 10 years old technology and made it like they invented it....FaceTime, Square phones, touch screen.

Iphone 5 is where Apple will "invent " bluetooth file transfer via Bluetooth 3.0...(when everyone else has gone to Wifi-direct oready...)...and ifags will hail it as a revolution.....

I don't think i can take your word. Sorry. Everyone i knows...from SGS to SGS2....all faced hanging issues. Maybe you don't use as much apps and functions as we do. You can just google "SGS2 hangs" and find out people complaining. Tons of it.

So my own wrap-up

Design: HOX wins, S3 like stupid Nokia Corby design

Build Quality: HOX wins as S3 still uses the plastic material which they never learn from mistakes in S2.

Screen Display: HOX wins as SLCD2 uses non-Pentile while S3 uses
Pentile screen. PPi also smaller than HOX

RAM: Draw as both also 1GB RAM

CPU: In gaming, HOX wins, in day-to day except gaming, S3 wins but I doubt you will notice any difference in terms of daily usage

SD Card slot: obviously S3 wins

Camera: HOX wins big on this, burst mode of 4.0fps vs 3.3fps in S3 and you can also capture shots while on video whereas S3 cant which is a big setback; picture quality dunno yet.

Battery life: No sure on this who wins as HOX uses 1800 Li-Po vs 2100 Li-Ion (Some said Li-Po is 1:1.2 of Li-Ion which convert into 2160 Li-Ion for HOX) But S3 wins on removable battery.

Interface: Sense 4.0 vs TouchwiZ, no need to compare edy. Obviously Sense 4.0 wins

So, I think HOX wins more than S3. This year HTC should dominate Samsung once again,

These are only my opinion.