Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Build LRT, not sea tunnel in Penang News

views
     
TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 09:33 PM, updated 14y ago

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=...7&if_height=338

QUOTE
Improve public transport in Penang instead of costly sea tunnel, says BN man


GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Government should focus on improving the public transportation system in the state, particularly with the construction of an LRT system, said Komtar Barisan Nasional coordinator Loh Chye Teik.

“The state should fulfil the dream of Penangites to have an LRT system around the island.

“The LRT system will also cost less than building a sea tunnel, which will bring more vehicles to the island,” he said yesterday.

Loh was commenting on the recent Penang Master Plan Study in which Halcrow Consultants director Dave Turner said a third link (the sea tunnel) was not necessary if public transportation was improved.

He also urged the state government to put up LED panels at bus stops so that passengers would know when a bus was coming and which one to take.

“Such panels have been put up in many international cities and we should do the same.

“It is currently very confusing to take a bus as passengers do not know how long they have to wait or which bus to take,” he added.

ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 09:34 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
user posted image

This post has been edited by ray123: Apr 12 2012, 09:35 PM
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 09:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


Weren't there some DAP fanatics who claimed DAP were prudent? There you go. Should have gone with an LRT system, but decides to go for under sea tunnel.
TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 09:36 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:34 PM)

*
$$$$$

LRT vs sea tunnel, better take LRT.
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 09:36 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:34 PM)
Weren't there some DAP fanatics who claimed DAP were prudent? There you go. Should have gone with an LRT system, but decides to go for under sea tunnel.
*
Wasn't it the federal government under BN that canceled the Penang LRT proposal after they lost the state in the first place?


megat89
post Apr 12 2012, 09:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
278 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
if im not mistaken, only the federal government can built the public transport..
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 09:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:36 PM)
Wasn't it the federal government under BN that canceled the Penang LRT proposal after they lost the state in the first place?
*
Wrong. The federal government canceled the Penang Monorail proposal. They didn't cancel it because they lost the state. BN isn't that petty you see. The federal government back then wanted to focus on the KTM project. smile.gif
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 09:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:36 PM)
Wasn't it the federal government under BN that canceled the Penang LRT proposal after they lost the state in the first place?
*
ouch.
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 09:40 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:38 PM)
Wrong. The federal government canceled the Penang Monorail proposal. They didn't cancel it because they lost the state. BN isn't that petty you see. The federal government back then wanted to focus on the KTM project.  smile.gif
*
I'll have to defer to Kampung2005's knowledge in this matter.
TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 09:41 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:38 PM)
Wrong. The federal government canceled the Penang Monorail proposal. They didn't cancel it because they lost the state. BN isn't that petty you see. The federal government back then wanted to focus on the KTM project.  smile.gif
*
While one may not say the reason is political, or not.....the timing of shelving monorail project is inappropriate.

If focus on KTM project, actually.....Ipoh-Padang Besar project was proposed early in 2000's, postponed by the then-PM, but only to be restarted in 9MP.
bobohead1988
post Apr 12 2012, 09:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
852 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Sungai-Takda-Ara


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:36 PM)
Wasn't it the federal government under BN that canceled the Penang LRT proposal after they lost the state in the first place?
*
QUOTE
Re-bidding by Other Parties

On April 2008, Melawar Industrial Group proposed to the opposition led state government an MYR 2.2 billion railway solution which operate on a single line and run on three different loops from locations like Gelugor, Farlim in Air Itam and Gurney Drive into the city. The system will feature steel structures and will run near the state's heritage buildings. In response, the state government will consider such proposal and may carry out the project by themselves instead of waiting for the federal government.[5]

[edit] Post-postponement

After the mid-term review of the Ninth Malaysia Plan, which was tabled in Parliament on June 26 2008, the monorail project, along with the Penang Outer Ring Road has been postponed indefinitel

Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 09:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
oh mai, headshot. Sry, no respawning for Olida.
But she will find a way to comeback. Just ignore the facts like always.
teehk_tee
post Apr 12 2012, 09:48 PM

ไม่เป็นไร
*******
Senior Member
5,363 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: กรุงเทพมหานคร BKK

i'd rather penang set up a tramway system like the ones in berlin et al.
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 09:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:40 PM)
I'll have to defer to Kampung2005's knowledge in this matter.
*
Ok. smile.gif

QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:41 PM)
While one may not say the reason is political, or not.....the timing of shelving monorail project is inappropriate.

If focus on KTM project, actually.....Ipoh-Padang Besar project was proposed early in 2000's, postponed by the then-PM, but only to be restarted in 9MP.
*
The timing? Well, it is indeed political, I admit. Let's be honest, wouldn't both sides want to look impressive? If the project had gone through, Malaysians would thank the Penang state government instead of the federal government. That would allow the opposition to benefit from "false publicity".

Anyway, the government shelved the project and revived the KTM project, as I remembered Badawi's exact words, "To focus on people's need first". Of course, Badawi was never really a good leader for the country.
asd5139
post Apr 12 2012, 09:51 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
19 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


She is just another typical bn cybertrooper wanna-be who think every single thing that BN do is brilliant. LRT should have started years ago.
SUSruffaz
post Apr 12 2012, 09:51 PM

yes I am a noob
******
Senior Member
1,066 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: 127.0.0.1



back to badawi. again laugh.gif
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 09:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ruffaz @ Apr 12 2012, 09:51 PM)
back to badawi. again laugh.gif
*
Why? You enjoyed Badawi's leadership? rolleyes.gif
TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 09:54 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:48 PM)
The timing? Well, it is indeed political, I admit. Let's be honest, wouldn't both sides want to look impressive? If the project had gone through, Malaysians would thank the Penang state government instead of the federal government. That would allow the opposition to benefit from "false publicity".

Anyway, the government shelved the project and revived the KTM project, as I remembered Badawi's exact words, "To focus on people's need first". Of course, Badawi was never really a good leader for the country.
*
What false publicity when Penang is part of Malaysia and the federal government should fund or at least, kick start it.

In Australia, federal (Commonwealth) government is Labor, but they still fund projects in Victoria which is ruled by Liberal National Party.
teehk_tee
post Apr 12 2012, 09:55 PM

ไม่เป็นไร
*******
Senior Member
5,363 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: กรุงเทพมหานคร BKK

QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:38 PM)
Wrong. The federal government canceled the Penang Monorail proposal. They didn't cancel it because they lost the state. BN isn't that petty you see. The federal government back then wanted to focus on the KTM project.  smile.gif
*
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:48 PM)
Ok.  smile.gif
The timing? Well, it is indeed political, I admit. Let's be honest, wouldn't both sides want to look impressive? If the project had gone through, Malaysians would thank the Penang state government instead of the federal government. That would allow the opposition to benefit from "false publicity".

Anyway, the government shelved the project and revived the KTM project, as I remembered Badawi's exact words, "To focus on people's need first". Of course, Badawi was never really a good leader for the country.
*
if you argue on both sides of the fence, you win. you've been taught well my young padawan
incubus_skj
post Apr 12 2012, 10:00 PM

oh mai gotto
******
Senior Member
1,750 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


>The federal government canceled the Penang Monorail proposal.
>They didn't cancel it because they lost the state.
>BN isn't that petty you see.
>BN
>isn't that petty

i... cannot brain this
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:54 PM)
What false publicity when Penang is part of Malaysia and the federal government should fund or at least, kick start it.

In Australia, federal (Commonwealth) government is Labor, but they still fund projects in Victoria which is ruled by Liberal National Party.
*
Malaysians are not Australians. We're not politically matured enough, compared to Australia. Do you really want people to be misled into thinking that the good deeds of one government while the other government takes credit? smile.gif
TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM)
Malaysians are not Australians. We're not politically matured enough, compared to Australia. Do you really want people to be misled into thinking that the good deeds of one government while the other government takes credit?  smile.gif
*
It's called, the "duty".

The duty of the government.
jesseclane
post Apr 12 2012, 10:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Apr 2008



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM)
It's called, the "duty".

The duty of the government.
*
+1

Govt != Party
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM)
It's called, the "duty".

The duty of the government.
*
Its also the duty of the voters to be well informed.

Anyway, it was Badawi's time. He was a poor and an ineffective leader. smile.gif
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(teehk_tee @ Apr 12 2012, 09:55 PM)
if you argue on both sides of the fence, you win. you've been taught well my young padawan
*
Oi, ini BX-series commando droid la. Semua droid ikut "Darth Jib Kor"
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 10:14 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM)
Malaysians are not Australians. We're not politically matured enough, compared to Australia. Do you really want people to be misled into thinking that the good deeds of one government while the other government takes credit?  smile.gif
*
What a flimsy argument. It's like saying the police should be reluctant to catch thieves because they are afraid that the local rukun tetangga people would take the credit.
poke_meh
post Apr 12 2012, 10:15 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2011


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:48 PM)
Ok.  smile.gif
The timing? Well, it is indeed political, I admit. Let's be honest, wouldn't both sides want to look impressive? If the project had gone through, Malaysians would thank the Penang state government instead of the federal government. That would allow the opposition to benefit from "false publicity".

Anyway, the government shelved the project and revived the KTM project, as I remembered Badawi's exact words, "To focus on people's need first". Of course, Badawi was never really a good leader for the country.
*
you opened my eyes.

/k/ made me hate pr. it's cybertroopers (hanief, joe mamak, cowhide, etc.) damn annoying. but you, my friend, made me back to neutral.
now i hate both.
poke_meh
post Apr 12 2012, 10:17 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2011


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:14 PM)
What a flimsy argument. It's like saying the police should be reluctant to catch thieves because they are afraid that the local rukun tetangga people would take the credit.
*
party vs party = police vs rukun tetangga

wow. doh.gif
kalandra
post Apr 12 2012, 10:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,669 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:05 PM)
Its also the duty of the voters to be well informed.

Anyway, it was Badawi's time. He was a poor and an ineffective leader.  smile.gif
*
it seems BN voters have failed in their duty.

QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:17 PM)
party vs party = police vs rukun tetangga

wow.  doh.gif
*
both state and federal governments should serve the people

This post has been edited by kalandra: Apr 12 2012, 10:18 PM
poke_meh
post Apr 12 2012, 10:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2011


QUOTE(kalandra @ Apr 12 2012, 10:17 PM)
it seems BN voters have failed in their duty.
*
PR have failed in their duty of informing voters. rolleyes.gif
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 10:19 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:17 PM)
party vs party = police vs rukun tetangga

wow.  doh.gif
*
It's federal government vs state government.
kalandra
post Apr 12 2012, 10:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,669 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:18 PM)
PR have failed in their duty of informing voters.  rolleyes.gif
*
Voters have chased PR away from their villages. The latest on was Anwar being chased out.
narf03
post Apr 12 2012, 10:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,547 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Metro Prima, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Earth, Sol


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM)
Malaysians are not Australians. We're not politically matured enough, compared to Australia. Do you really want people to be misled into thinking that the good deeds of one government while the other government takes credit?  smile.gif
*
who to blame, BN, they control the mass media and fed us those idiotic main backside news instead of letting us be smart, they prefer us to be fool.
kalandra
post Apr 12 2012, 10:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,669 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:15 PM)
you opened my eyes.

/k/ made me hate pr. it's cybertroopers (hanief, joe mamak, cowhide, etc.) damn annoying. but you, my friend, made me back to neutral.
now i hate both.
*
Perhaps you should read Utusan, watch TV1 (TV3 looks moderate in comparison), and go to UMNO dominated forums. Those people are just a tiny bit more annoying.

This post has been edited by kalandra: Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM
duHwaN
post Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM

Nope
******
Senior Member
1,644 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Penang
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:01 PM)
Malaysians are not Australians. We're not politically matured enough, compared to Australia. Do you really want people to be misled into thinking that the good deeds of one government while the other government takes credit?  smile.gif
*
Wow. Seriously dude. This sort of petty stuffs belong to preschoolers. So you are saying publicity > need? What sort of government is that?
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:14 PM)
What a flimsy argument. It's like saying the police should be reluctant to catch thieves because they are afraid that the local rukun tetangga people would take the credit.
*
Its not. Political planning is part of political culture. Vote opposition if you want to, but voters will have to bare with that decision if it backfires.

QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:15 PM)
you opened my eyes.

/k/ made me hate pr. it's cybertroopers (hanief, joe mamak, cowhide, etc.) damn annoying. but you, my friend, made me back to neutral.
now i hate both.
*
You're welcome. We need more people like you.

QUOTE(kalandra @ Apr 12 2012, 10:17 PM)
it seems BN voters have failed in their duty.
*
No they haven't. They have been well informed and they have done a good job voting for a good government.
narf03
post Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,547 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Metro Prima, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Earth, Sol


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:05 PM)
Its also the duty of the voters to be well informed.

Anyway, it was Badawi's time. He was a poor and an ineffective leader.  smile.gif
*
i guess if 1 day BN change PM, u will be hammering Najib, whos ass smells good ? must be your current boss 1.
poke_meh
post Apr 12 2012, 10:23 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2011


QUOTE(kalandra @ Apr 12 2012, 10:21 PM)
Perhaps you should read Utusan, watch TV1 (TV3 looks moderate in comparison), and go to UMNO dominated forums. Those people are just a tiny bit more annoying.
*
another idiot. told u i hate bn as much as u guys, but thanks, you guys made me hate pr as much.
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(narf03 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:21 PM)
who to blame, BN, they control the mass media and fed us those idiotic main backside news instead of letting us be smart, they prefer us to be fool.
*
Well, if PR is only talking about breeding hatred towards BN, why should the media give room to them? Their job is ensure the development of the country is taken care of, which I've yet to see them do. I haven't seen them provide a good check & balance system. Look at Selangor for example. Poorly managed state plagued with problems which are yet to be sorted out. YET, BN have been excellent opposition in Selangor. Noh Omar should be Selangor's chief minister. smile.gif

QUOTE(duHwaN @ Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM)
Wow. Seriously dude. This sort of petty stuffs belong to preschoolers. So you are saying publicity > need? What sort of government is that?
*
Well, its part of politics. That's why Malaysians should learn to vote smartly.
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(narf03 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM)
i guess if 1 day BN change PM, u will be hammering Najib, whos ass smells good ? must be your current boss 1.
*
I can't see Malaysia losing Najib as PM. smile.gif
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 10:27 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM)
Its not. Political planning is part of political culture. Vote opposition if you want to, but voters will have to bare with that decision if it backfires.
*
"Backfires".

You seem to think that people should be afraid of their government. You mention about Malaysians not being politically mature. It seems your views about democracy and good governance would put you in that category as well.

How can you justify supporting a government that would punish those that did not vote for it? But then again I'm guessing you'll just spin it away saying "it's not punishing, but rewarding and giving priorities to those who voted for the government first".

Next thing you'll be saying cronies deserve their special positions and immunity from the law because of their unending support for the people in charge.
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
Analysis complete.

BX-series programming:
Fictional background - nonmalay. neutral, voted PR previously. Current BN supporter, due to BN insaf and reform. Scheduled for night shift.
Objective - Give BN 2/3 majority.

*If good stuff - BN buat. If cornered by facts, buat tak nampak and move to next point.
*If bad stuff - salah PR. If cornered by facts, salah Badawi.
*If shown examples from other developed countries - say Malaysian not matured/lazy and need to be controlled.
*If asked about BN songlap/misdoings - refer them to MACC, 14 floor.
*Never give sos for any accusations, as could be immediately fact-checked by keyboard warriors.
*add smiley in reply, if counter-point if strong.
narf03
post Apr 12 2012, 10:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,547 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Metro Prima, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Earth, Sol


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:25 PM)
I can't see Malaysia losing Najib as PM.  smile.gif
*
lol, how old is him and u think we will allows a dead man to be PM, ok, perhaps u are older than him then, you are correct, no chance for you to hammer him =P
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:27 PM)
"Backfires".

You seem to think that people should be afraid of their government. You mention about Malaysians not being politically mature. It seems your views about democracy and good governance would put you in that category as well.

How can you justify supporting a government that would punish those that did not vote for it? But then again I'm guessing you'll just spin it away saying "it's not punishing, but rewarding and giving priorities to those who voted for the government first".

Next thing you'll be saying cronies deserve their special positions and immunity from the law because of their unending support for the people in charge.
*
When did mention that the people should be afraid of their government? Perhaps what you could say is the people should be careful who they vote for.

The government didn't punish the people it did not vote for. On contrary, the Selangor government did that when the state government decided to give an allocation to each PR ADUN to improve their constituents. Isn't this punishing those who voted for BN?
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(narf03 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:28 PM)
lol, how old is him and u think we will allows a dead man to be PM, ok, perhaps u are older than him then, you are correct, no chance for you to hammer him =P
*
He's in his 50s I think. smile.gif
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:15 PM)
you opened my eyes.

/k/ made me hate pr. it's cybertroopers (hanief, joe mamak, cowhide, etc.) damn annoying. but you, my friend, made me back to neutral.
now i hate both.
*
welcome. give you "B1 droid" designation first.
If you write as well as Olida, then level up ok? brows.gif
kalandra
post Apr 12 2012, 10:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,669 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:23 PM)
another idiot. told u i hate bn as much as u guys, but thanks, you guys made me hate pr as much.
*
Perhaps PR downfall is that their supporters gave the impression that they think BN is the devil and PR is the angel. Perhaps some really think PR is the saviour of Malaysia. I'm just angry how much BN has messed up. Yes, some are overenthusiastic in their support for PR, but could you blame them after long years of BN mismanagement? I'm not delusional to think PR has no corrupt leaders or will have no corruption, but even a 10% reduction in corruption would go a long way for Malaysia.

Oh and some that fanatical only to counter BN supporters arguement. You don't believe how much PR supporters have to endure. Sure Lowyat forum is like PR heaven, but how bout real life?

This post has been edited by kalandra: Apr 12 2012, 10:34 PM
poke_meh
post Apr 12 2012, 10:33 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2011


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 12 2012, 10:31 PM)
welcome. give you "B1 droid" designation first.
If you write as well as Olida, then level up ok? brows.gif
*
saw this countless times in /k/.
pr cyberdogs calling regular, neutral people bntrooper.
in the end, pr lose our vote. it's pathetic, really rolleyes.gif


QUOTE(kalandra @ Apr 12 2012, 10:31 PM)
Perhaps PR downfall is that their supporters gave the impression that they think BN is the devil and PR is the angel. Perhaps some really think PR is the saviour of Malaysia. I'm just angry how much BN has messed up. Yes, some are overenthusiastic in their support for PR, but could you blame them after long years of BN mismanagement? I'm not delusional to think PR has no corrupt leaders or will have no corruption, but even a 10% reduction in corruption would go a long way for Malaysia.

Oh and some that fanatical only to counter BN supporters arguement. You don't believe how much PR supporters have to endure. Sure Lowyat forum is like PR heaven, but how bout real life?
*
now u're talking with sense wub.gif
some of them are really rude and use personal attack every time we say they are exaggerating

btw i think in real life, money > all.
BN could give it to any1 n they'll fall for the trap.
If only the internet could be used just like that, PR won't have a chance.


This post has been edited by poke_meh: Apr 12 2012, 10:37 PM
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:30 PM)
When did mention that the people should be afraid of their government? Perhaps what you could say is the people should be careful who they vote for.

The government didn't punish the people it did not vote for. On contrary, the Selangor government did that when the state government decided to give an allocation to each PR ADUN to improve their constituents. Isn't this punishing those who voted for BN?
*
remember Penangites, who tells the story of Jelutong roads that were never repaired with major potholes, during BN control. Cos Jelutong was DAP stronghold.
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(poke_meh @ Apr 12 2012, 10:33 PM)
saw this countless times in /k/.
pr cyberdogs calling regular, neutral people bntrooper.
in the end, pr lose our vote. it's pathetic, really  rolleyes.gif
*
don't worry. won't simply accuse you.
everyone can decide from your postings.
we are educated now.
And i just got my SPM results. Horray.
Chartry
post Apr 12 2012, 10:41 PM

In the mood of love
******
Senior Member
1,616 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



How do you define a good leader? Is it

1) take commision 500 mil, used millions of ringgit to lavishly renovate military camp as part of a stimulus fund during recession, promise to bath the keris with the blood of the Chinese, u tolong I, I tolong u. This is a trait of a good leader?

Or do u prefer,

2) I am a Malay first. Malaysia education system is more advanced than those in developed country. Support perkasa and suggest more racially extremist group to be set up.

Or do u prefer

3) have sex with his personal friends but later admit his mistake is keep going to the same room at the same hotel. Threatens the people who he claims to represent by saying hos party will pull out from all gov position if they dun vote for his party. Hire models to front his party agm. Said the previous president is irrelevant and insult him publicly.

Or do u like leader like

4) backdoor minister, lose d election but took became senator and deputy minister, kowtow to his master who ruled the party for31 years but marginalized the ppl they are supposed to represent.

All of this haven count all other leader like rapist, buta huruf dunno English when questioned by a court, curi here curi there, buy house got discount worth millions, got anak beranak genius billionaires, take lembu loan but go buy condos, anak gangster claims to be royalty and assault ppl who are carrying out their duty, say its ok to tarik balik assistance to oku cause he supports opposition, say rakyat dun lawan gov who are tauke.

I not bodoh. So sorry la, I wont vote for these ppl.
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 12 2012, 10:34 PM)
remember Penangites, who tells the story of Jelutong roads that were never repaired with major potholes, during BN control. Cos Jelutong was DAP stronghold.
*
Why don't you just blame your DAP guy for a poor job done? rolleyes.gif
SUSalaskanbunny
post Apr 12 2012, 10:43 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

LGE for PM la..
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 10:44 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:30 PM)
When did mention that the people should be afraid of their government? Perhaps what you could say is the people should be careful who they vote for.
*
Why else do you think the Opposition had gained so much support from its perennial loser status before Anwar? Lies cannot sustain a political movement, forgeries cannot remain hidden. A false cause is insufficient for long lasting change. You seem to think Opposition supporters suffer from some sort of pure denial of BN but as a BN voter who switched I can honestly tell you I just don't see any good for the country if the status quo remains the same.

Besides, not all of us are mere politically motivated. I don't care who is in charge of the country as long as he (or she!) fixes our long standing problems like our slipping education standards, brain drain due to preferential treatment, imbalanced development between the peninsular and the East, brainwashing institutions like BTN, increased household debt, bloated civil service, our slowly disappearing competitive edge over other ASEAN countries etc etc etc. All these problems are not "recent". They did not just happen overnight or within the past few years.

All these things were legacies from Mahathir during his 22-year tenure. Badawi couldn't solve it. Najib isn't doing anything different from his two predecessors. My father was secretary to the PM's department and he too sees no changes despite brandings of KPI, NKRA, ETP and GTP. Except from the fact his old department went from 4000-odd people under Mahathir to 45,000 under Najib.

QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:30 PM)
The government didn't punish the people it did not vote for. On contrary, the Selangor government did that when the state government decided to give an allocation to each PR ADUN to improve their constituents. Isn't this punishing those who voted for BN?
*
I'm sorry but you lost me there, seems you have a mistake somewhere between Selangor government and state government. I can't tell if you're referring to pre-Opposition Selangor era or the current situation today.

This post has been edited by ray123: Apr 12 2012, 10:46 PM
MissIceRina
post Apr 12 2012, 10:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 09:34 PM)
Weren't there some DAP fanatics who claimed DAP were prudent? There you go. Should have gone with an LRT system, but decides to go for under sea tunnel.
*
QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 09:36 PM)
Wasn't it the federal government under BN that canceled the Penang LRT proposal after they lost the state in the first place?
*
This thread is getting derailed.

The tunnel was not new, according to a report in The Edge years ago, tunnel was considered before they decided to go for second bridge.

The State Government propose it. It did not implement it.

Prudent or not, it does not lies in the State Government hand to approve the proposal.
kaffra
post Apr 12 2012, 10:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
643 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Deutschland


QUOTE(narf03 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:22 PM)
i guess if 1 day BN change PM, u will be hammering Najib, whos ass smells good ? must be your current boss 1.
*
most people vote for a variety of reasons it's possible and normal for some to agree with bn's concept but not necessarily najibs way.
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(MissIceRina @ Apr 12 2012, 10:48 PM)
This thread is getting derailed.
...
...
*
I saw what u did thar.
"derailed" in a LRT thread.

Kampung2005 must remember this phrase. Very useful in his threads.

This post has been edited by Cowhide: Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM
Chartry
post Apr 12 2012, 10:50 PM

In the mood of love
******
Senior Member
1,616 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



Pemandu, Gtp, etp all pr work. Even air Asia buy new planes they wanna claim credits
allinuff
post Apr 12 2012, 10:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
All you fanbois seriously think BN or PR are going to save Malaysia?

One stinks as bad as the other. But, if you keep both from being too powerful, their stench cancels each other out somewhat and Malaysians can breathe a sigh of relief.

This post has been edited by allinuff: Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM
TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(MissIceRina @ Apr 12 2012, 10:48 PM)
This thread is getting derailed.

The tunnel was not new, according to a report in The Edge years ago, tunnel was considered before they decided to go for second bridge.

The State Government propose it. It did not implement it.

Prudent or not, it does not lies in the State Government hand to approve the proposal.
*
For road tunnel, it was first discussed during the planning for second bridge, before 2008.

There were proposals, such as building undersea tunnel, or a bridge on the north, or the bridge on the south (which became the 2nd bridge).
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 10:44 PM)
Why else do you think the Opposition had gained so much support from its perennial loser status before Anwar? Lies cannot sustain a political movement, forgeries cannot remain hidden. A false cause is insufficient for long lasting change. You seem to think Opposition supporters suffer from some sort of pure denial of BN but as a BN voter who switched I can honestly tell you I just don't see any good for the country if the status quo remains the same.

Besides, not all of us are mere politically motivated. I don't care who is in charge of the country as long as he (or she!) fixes our long standing problems like our slipping education standards, brain drain due to preferential treatment, imbalanced development between the peninsular and the East, brainwashing institutions like BTN, increased household debt, bloated civil service, our slowly disappearing competitive edge over other ASEAN countries etc etc etc. All these problems are not "recent". They did not just happen overnight or within the past few years.

All these things were legacies from Mahathir during his 22-year tenure. Badawi couldn't solve it. Najib isn't doing anything different from his two predecessors. My father was secretary to the PM's department and he too sees no changes despite brandings of KPI, NKRA, ETP and GTP. Except from the fact his old department went from 4000-odd people under Mahathir to 45,000 under Najib.

I'm sorry but you lost me there, seems you have a mistake somewhere between Selangor government and state government. I can't tell if you're referring to pre-Opposition Selangor era or the current situation today.
*
That's because that's what PR supporters are. They are chauvinists being pretentiously objective.

That's also the same argument used by all supporters. I can say the same excuse for my reason to support BN. BN have been addressing all those problems. For instance, brain drain, the government launched a corp to bring back those talents who left the country. Household debts? How is this the government's fault? People are spending lavishly above their means, and the blame goes to the federal government. Are you serious? Bloated civil service? Not really. We've got many government departments and they are all there to serve the Rakyat.

Mahathir is the most visionary leader we've had. For you to make a statement like that indicates that you're just ungrateful for all the things we accomplished during those years.

I was referring to the present Selangor state government. I should have made it clear and easy for you to understand. smile.gif
SUSjimmyoon
post Apr 12 2012, 10:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
49 posts

Joined: Apr 2012



user posted image

So don't need waste your gold to argue with that fella.
I've seen everybody off-topic because of him.
Kinda sorry for that MOD.

Time will tell in the end.it's near anyway ^^
kaffra
post Apr 12 2012, 10:55 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
643 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Deutschland


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 12 2012, 10:34 PM)
remember Penangites, who tells the story of Jelutong roads that were never repaired with major potholes, during BN control. Cos Jelutong was DAP stronghold.
*
I don't know if u are really from Penang, but jelutong road has been repaired upgraded countless times. For a long time it was the shortest and fastest way from tanjung to south of the island.
Similarly roadworks near ftz area
SUSjimmyoon
post Apr 12 2012, 10:57 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
49 posts

Joined: Apr 2012



QUOTE(kaffra @ Apr 12 2012, 10:55 PM)
I don't know if u are really from Penang, but jelutong road has been repaired upgraded countless times. For a long time it was the shortest and fastest way from tanjung to south of the island.
Similarly roadworks near ftz area
*
Yeah... pasar area still worst...They plant new trees (big fat like coconut tree but smaller) around my area. smile.gif

This post has been edited by jimmyoon: Apr 12 2012, 10:58 PM
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 10:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(kaffra @ Apr 12 2012, 10:55 PM)
I don't know if u are really from Penang, but jelutong road has been repaired upgraded countless times. For a long time it was the shortest and fastest way from tanjung to south of the island.
Similarly roadworks near ftz area
*
Heard from Penangites, as it was an obvious experience, when an out-station person drives thru there.
Nevermind, let a real PG (like junsheng) to confirm this.

This post has been edited by Cowhide: Apr 12 2012, 10:59 PM
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 11:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM)
That's because that's what PR supporters are. They are chauvinists being pretentiously objective.

That's also the same argument used by all supporters. I can say the same excuse for my reason to support BN. BN have been addressing all those problems. For instance, brain drain, the government launched a corp to bring back those talents who left the country. Household debts? How is this the government's fault? People are spending lavishly above their means, and the blame goes to the federal government. Are you serious? Bloated civil service? Not really. We've got many government departments and they are all there to serve the Rakyat.

Mahathir is the most visionary leader we've had. For you to make a statement like that indicates that you're just ungrateful for all the things we accomplished during those years.
..
*
FACT-Checked.
https://rightways.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/...he-delinguents/

Every 3 taxpayers supports 2 civil servants in Malaysia
“The highest ratio of civil servants in the world”!
Most bloated civil service

* With 1.3 million civil servants to a population of 26 million, Malaysia has one of the highest civil servants-to-population ratio in the world by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development standards.
* In 2009, Malaysia’s civil servants-to-population ratio was the highest in Asia Pacific. The ratio was 4.68 per cent, compared to Singapore’s 1.5 per cent, Indonesia’s 1.79 per cent, Korea’s 1.85 per cent and Thailand’s 2.06 per cent all of which have less than half our ratio.

Subject: Civil Servants in Malaysia…Alarming Figures
1. Number of civil servants in Malaysia
2000 - 894,788
2008 - 1.2M
2011 - 1.3M+
During 2000 to 2008, increase of 300,000 or each year 38,151 or each day 104.
2 . Money spent on salary / remuneration
2005 - RM25.6Billion
2008 - RM41.0Billion (or from each tax payer RM22,800)
An increase of a whopping 60% during 3 years only. If it is private company, sure “bungkus”!
3. Population that pays tax 1.8M
Number of civil servants 1.2M
Meaning every 1.5 tax payer support 1 civil servant.


We know, we know. Salah Badawi.

This post has been edited by Cowhide: Apr 12 2012, 11:03 PM
ray123
post Apr 12 2012, 11:03 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM)
Mahathir is the most visionary leader we've had. For you to make a statement like that indicates that you're just ungrateful for all the things we accomplished during those years.
*
"Ungrateful"? What do you know about it? You speak as if he is some sort of Great Leader and that we're blessed to have him? This is the difference between us: You speak as if his accomplishments were "gifts" to us Malaysians. I see them as him doing his duty as a national leader. Nothing more, nothing less. I dare say ANY leader who could take over Malaysia when we were ahead of South Korea and Taiwan could have done what he did, and maybe even more. He didn't even do it all above board either, like how he handled the great tin market scandal (which he personally admitted to).

I'll stop here because I don't want to derail the thread any further. Suffice to say we see things differently: you think we should be beholden to the past whereas I'm more concerned about the future.
amirsubhi
post Apr 12 2012, 11:04 PM

The Power Is IN Your Hand!
******
Senior Member
1,472 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: SumwHeRe In MaLaYsIa



politic again, this is boring


Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 11:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 12 2012, 11:02 PM)
FACT-Checked.
https://rightways.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/...he-delinguents/

Every 3 taxpayers supports 2 civil servants in Malaysia
“The highest ratio of civil servants in the world”!
Most bloated civil service

* With 1.3 million civil servants to a population of 26 million, Malaysia has one of the highest civil servants-to-population ratio in the world by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development standards.
* In 2009, Malaysia’s civil servants-to-population ratio was the highest in Asia Pacific. The ratio was 4.68 per cent, compared to Singapore’s 1.5 per cent, Indonesia’s 1.79 per cent, Korea’s 1.85 per cent and Thailand’s 2.06 per cent all of which have less than half our ratio.

Subject: Civil Servants in Malaysia…Alarming Figures
1. Number of civil servants in Malaysia
  2000   -  894,788
  2008  -  1.2M
  2011  -  1.3M+
During 2000 to 2008, increase of 300,000 or each year 38,151 or each day 104.
2 . Money spent on salary / remuneration
  2005  -  RM25.6Billion
  2008  -  RM41.0Billion (or from each tax payer RM22,800)
An increase of a whopping 60% during 3 years only. If it is private company, sure “bungkus”!
3. Population that pays tax  1.8M
    Number of civil servants   1.2M
Meaning every 1.5 tax payer support 1 civil servant.

*
So? I don't care. So long as their service is good while efficiency is good, I'm happy.

The problem is, Malaysians are not productive in general. Therefore, the government, just like most private companies need to hire more employees to compensate for the losses incurred due to the low productivity rate. That's why its more beneficial for companies to hire cheap foreign labour.

This post has been edited by Olida: Apr 12 2012, 11:05 PM
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 11:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(ray123 @ Apr 12 2012, 11:03 PM)
"Ungrateful"? What do you know about it? You speak as if he is some sort of Great Leader and that we're blessed to have him? This is the difference between us: You speak as if his accomplishments were "gifts" to us Malaysians. I see them as him doing his duty as a national leader. Nothing more, nothing less. I dare say ANY leader who could take over Malaysia when we were ahead of South Korea and Taiwan could have done what he did, and maybe even more. He didn't even do it all above board either, like how he handled the great tin market scandal (which he personally admitted to).

I'll stop here because I don't want to derail the thread any further. Suffice to say we see things differently: you think we should be beholden to the past whereas I'm more concerned about the future.
*
I'm sorry that you can't appreciate the development brought by Mahathir. He could have always chosen to take Zimbabwe's path or Greece's path. Instead he did it his own way. Therefore, we as Malaysians must be thankful for that. smile.gif
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 11:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(amirsubhi @ Apr 12 2012, 11:04 PM)
politic again, this is boring
*
Its very boring to people; who doesn't understand the implications of politics on the future of their children and Nation.
Dota2 gooding?
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 11:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:05 PM)
So? I don't care. So long as their service is good while efficiency is good, I'm happy.

The problem is, Malaysians are not productive in general. Therefore, the government, just like most private companies need to hire more employees to compensate for the losses incurred due to the low productivity rate. That's why its more beneficial for companies to hire cheap foreign labour.
*
Did you just accused the civil service (78.2% Malay) as being not productive?

https://rightways.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/...he-delinguents/
Best contradiction of 1Malaysia

* As at 31 December 2009, the racial breakdown of the Malaysian civil service comprising 1,247,894 employees was as follows: Malay (78.2 per cent); Other Bumiputras (7.7 per cent); Chinese (5.8 per cent), Indian (4.0 per cent); and Others (4.2 per cent).

* “This is the worst multi-racial composition of the government service, with the lowest Chinese and Indian representation in the public service in Malaysia’s 53-year history. This is clearly seen from the three sets of comparative figures of the racial breakdown of the civil service before the NEP (1971) and as compared to Dec. 2009 – Malays (60.80 per cent and 78.2 per cent); Chinese (20.2% and 5.8 per cent); Indians (17.4 per cent and 4.0 per cent); and Others (1.6 per cent and 4.2 per cent).


On topic, maybe Penang Airport needs a SMART tunnel?

This post has been edited by Cowhide: Apr 12 2012, 11:17 PM
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 11:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 12 2012, 11:16 PM)
Did you just accused the civil service (78.2% Malay) as being not productive?

https://rightways.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/...he-delinguents/
Best contradiction of 1Malaysia

* As at 31 December 2009, the racial breakdown of the Malaysian civil service comprising 1,247,894 employees was as follows: Malay (78.2 per cent); Other Bumiputras (7.7 per cent); Chinese (5.8 per cent), Indian (4.0 per cent); and Others (4.2 per cent).

* “This is the worst multi-racial composition of the government service, with the lowest Chinese and Indian representation in the public service in Malaysia’s 53-year history. This is clearly seen from the three sets of comparative figures of the racial breakdown of the civil service before the NEP (1971) and as compared to Dec. 2009 – Malays (60.80 per cent and 78.2 per cent); Chinese (20.2% and 5.8 per cent); Indians (17.4 per cent and 4.0 per cent); and Others (1.6 per cent and 4.2 per cent).


On topic, maybe Penang Airport needs a SMART tunnel?
*
I only stated my opinion that MALAYSIANS in general are not productive. smile.gif
MissIceRina
post Apr 12 2012, 11:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:05 PM)
So? I don't care. So long as their service is good while efficiency is good, I'm happy.

The problem is, Malaysians are not productive in general. Therefore, the government, just like most private companies need to hire more employees to compensate for the losses incurred due to the low productivity rate. That's why its more beneficial for companies to hire cheap foreign labour.
*
lol wut?

Private companies fire when productivity rate is low. It's called lay off.
It's an idiotic move to hire more people when your worker are already lazy.

We have the highest ratio of civil servants in the world. That includes China and & India & US.
MissIceRina
post Apr 12 2012, 11:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:05 PM)
So? I don't care. So long as their service is good while efficiency is good, I'm happy.

The problem is, Malaysians are not productive in general. Therefore, the government, just like most private companies need to hire more employees to compensate for the losses incurred due to the low productivity rate. That's why its more beneficial for companies to hire cheap foreign labour.
*
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:19 PM)
I only stated my opinion that MALAYSIANS in general are not productive.  smile.gif
*
No.

You just stated that their service is good and efficiency is good.

Then you say they have to hire more people because their current worker is low in productivity.

You were referring to the government, specifically.

TSKampung2005
post Apr 12 2012, 11:23 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
Aiyoyo, this thread offtopic too much liao.
amirsubhi
post Apr 12 2012, 11:28 PM

The Power Is IN Your Hand!
******
Senior Member
1,472 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: SumwHeRe In MaLaYsIa



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 11:23 PM)
Aiyoyo, this thread offtopic too much liao.
*
this thread need to be off topic, its a must! for the future of malaysian laugh.gif

MissIceRina
post Apr 12 2012, 11:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 11:23 PM)
Aiyoyo, this thread offtopic too much liao.
*
Close thread bah

QUOTE(amirsubhi @ Apr 12 2012, 11:28 PM)
this thread need to be off topic, its a must!  for the future of malaysian laugh.gif
*
It's not.

We are just debunking Olida which has no significant whatsoever.

He will just continue on a another thread.
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 11:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Apr 12 2012, 11:23 PM)
Aiyoyo, this thread offtopic too much liao.
*
This thread is derailed and fell under the sea tunnel.
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 11:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(amirsubhi @ Apr 12 2012, 11:28 PM)
this thread need to be off topic, its a must!  for the future of malaysian laugh.gif
*
the future of all of our children. sweat.gif
MissIceRina
post Apr 12 2012, 11:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: May 2011
aaannnnddd, he continue in another thread

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2304132
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 11:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(MissIceRina @ Apr 12 2012, 11:20 PM)
lol wut?

Private companies fire when productivity rate is low. It's called lay off.
It's an idiotic move to hire more people when your worker are already lazy.

We have the highest ratio of civil servants in the world. That includes China and & India & US.
*
Not really. Its costly these days to lay off.

QUOTE(MissIceRina @ Apr 12 2012, 11:22 PM)
No.

You just stated that their service is good and efficiency is good.

Then you say they have to hire more people because their current worker is low in productivity.

You were referring to the government, specifically.
*
You see, they need to hire more workers since Malaysian workers are just not productive in general, to maintain good service to the public. Simple.
MissIceRina
post Apr 12 2012, 11:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: May 2011
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:32 PM)
Not really. Its costly these days to lay off.
You see, they need to hire more workers since Malaysian workers are just not productive in general, to maintain good service to the public. Simple.
*
1) Or they can stop hiring people.
You just don't seem to understand the phrase "highest ratio of civil servants in the world". That is not the mark of a good government by world standard.
How is that even efficiency?

2) Oh god, that 2nd statement. Makes me facepalm so hard.
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 11:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(MissIceRina @ Apr 12 2012, 11:39 PM)
1) Or they can stop hiring people.
You just don't seem to understand the phrase "highest ratio of civil servants in the world". That is not the mark of a good government by world standard.
How is that even efficiency?

2) Oh god, that 2nd statement. Makes me facepalm so hard.
*
You see, its like the saying, it takes one Indonesia to do the jobs of two Malaysians. smile.gif

The government cannot resort to hiring foreign labour for government departments right? doh.gif
Cowhide
post Apr 12 2012, 11:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:41 PM)
You see, its like the saying, it takes one Indonesia to do the jobs of two Malaysians.  smile.gif

The government cannot resort to hiring foreign labour for government departments right?  doh.gif
*
I think there is enough rope already.

This post has been edited by Cowhide: Apr 12 2012, 11:42 PM
Olida
post Apr 12 2012, 11:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 12 2012, 11:42 PM)
I think there is enough rope already.
*
For?
Cowhide
post Apr 13 2012, 12:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 11:41 PM)
You see, its like the saying, it takes one Indonesia to do the jobs of two Malaysians.  smile.gif

The government cannot resort to hiring foreign labour for government departments right?  doh.gif
*
Lets try a really wild idea. Maybe hire more productive malaysians? like indians, since they are only 4% and generally shouldn't be the reason for the "low productivity" you talked about?

* As at 31 December 2009, the racial breakdown of the Malaysian civil service comprising 1,247,894 employees was as follows: Malay (78.2 per cent); Other Bumiputras (7.7 per cent); Chinese (5.8 per cent), Indian (4.0 per cent); and Others (4.2 per cent).

This post has been edited by Cowhide: Apr 13 2012, 12:08 AM
Olida
post Apr 13 2012, 12:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 13 2012, 12:00 AM)
Lets try a really wild idea. Maybe hire more productive malaysians? like indians, since they are only 4% and generally should be the reason for the "low productivity" you talked about?

* As at 31 December 2009, the racial breakdown of the Malaysian civil service comprising 1,247,894 employees was as follows: Malay (78.2 per cent); Other Bumiputras (7.7 per cent); Chinese (5.8 per cent), Indian (4.0 per cent); and Others (4.2 per cent).
*
Wild idea? This idea doesn't make sense. Population size has nothing to do with productivity rates. Its more to do with mentality. smile.gif
Cowhide
post Apr 13 2012, 12:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 13 2012, 12:05 AM)
Wild idea? This idea doesn't make sense. Population size has nothing to do with productivity rates. Its more to do with mentality.  smile.gif
*
Then is the private sector workers the same?
Olida
post Apr 13 2012, 12:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Cowhide @ Apr 13 2012, 12:09 AM)
Then is the private sector workers the same?
*
Yes. Private sector workers and government sector workers. Malaysians in general have low productivity rates. smile.gif
Kalist0
post Apr 13 2012, 01:17 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
119 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: malaysial


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 13 2012, 01:11 AM)
Yes. Private sector workers and government sector workers. Malaysians in general have low productivity rates.  smile.gif
*
Get your facts straight mister. biggrin.gif
espressomelt
post Apr 13 2012, 02:40 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


why sea tunnel ?
Grassmuncher
post Apr 13 2012, 02:52 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM)
Mahathir is the most visionary leader we've had. For you to make a statement like that indicates that you're just ungrateful for all the things we accomplished during those years.
*
Ungrateful? Who got him into power the first place? He is the one that should be grateful to the rakyat for voting him in.
espressomelt
post Apr 13 2012, 04:01 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


why we need to be grateful to leaders ? they are civil servants anyway ...
geolee
post Apr 13 2012, 05:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
135 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


bridge need federal govt approval
LRT need federal govt approval
monorail need federal govt approval
new taxi system need federal govt approval
sea tunnel no need..i think that is the main reason..
anyone can confirm.

Also, it is not only the moving of people, we are talking of moving of commodity,
If IKEA opens in Penang Island..who will come and buy if there is delivery of goods..
If there is no good road system, where IKEA will give free delivery..
DarkNite
post Apr 13 2012, 06:27 AM

ФĻĐ ИΞШB!Ξ
********
All Stars
11,058 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 12 2012, 10:52 PM)
....

Mahathir is the most visionary leader we've had. For you to make a statement like that indicates that you're just ungrateful for all the things we accomplished during those years.
*
He should NOT be place on a pedestal and be worshiped.
He is not infallible. He has made mistakes which affect the Rakyat drastically!
asd5139
post Apr 13 2012, 07:14 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
19 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(DarkNite @ Apr 13 2012, 06:27 AM)
He should NOT be place on a pedestal and be worshiped.
He is not infallible. He has made mistakes which affect the Rakyat drastically!
*
As much as Mahathir bring 'prosper' to Malaysia, people should not forget all the big mistakes that he had done and among them is Super-cronism simply because he wants back the malay votes. I learn this from Malaysian Studies... and he shall not be forgiven for every shit that he had done in the country.

This post has been edited by asd5139: Apr 13 2012, 07:15 AM
DarkNite
post Apr 13 2012, 07:23 AM

ФĻĐ ИΞШB!Ξ
********
All Stars
11,058 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(asd5139 @ Apr 13 2012, 07:14 AM)
As much as Mahathir bring 'prosper' to Malaysia, people should not forget all the big mistakes that he had done and among them is Super-cronism simply because he wants back the malay votes. I learn this from Malaysian Studies... and he shall not be forgiven for every shit that he had done in the country.
*
Learning from Mahathir's mistakes
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/26640
Proton has been a failure. After 20 years of existence and protection, at huge costs to the nation, they are barely able to produce original designs. They had to spend hundred of millions in 1996 to acquire UK's Lotus to overcome a lack of in-house engineering capability. They are still not able to penetrate the US market, the world's most lucrative car market. It has not spawned an auto industry, unlike the Korean car industry which grew from the bottom up, making and supplying parts to Japanese auto-makers long before making their own cars.

How many times must the Rakyat bail out MAS? sad.gif
Cronies gets richer but the Rakyat gets the sick baby.
Major mistake. Doubters and critics point to the enormous wealth he accumulated for his cronies and proxies through the money-making schemes hatched under the guise of the NEP, and by privatizing government assets to favored Malay entrepreneurs, one of whom is the disgraced former MAS chairman Tajudin Ramli.Tajudin and friends like Halim Saad fell from hero to zero, losing enormous amounts of money and requiring massive government bailouts.



This post has been edited by DarkNite: Apr 13 2012, 07:25 AM
syabilng
post Apr 13 2012, 09:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Eastern Kingdom

QUOTE(DarkNite @ Apr 13 2012, 07:23 AM)
Learning from Mahathir's mistakes
Cronies gets richer but the Rakyat gets the sick baby.
*
Aaaand this always goes on.
Olida
post Apr 13 2012, 12:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Kalist0 @ Apr 13 2012, 01:17 AM)
Get your facts straight mister.  biggrin.gif
*
My facts are right. Malaysian employees are half-baked employees with low productivity rates. smile.gif

QUOTE(Grassmuncher @ Apr 13 2012, 02:52 AM)
Ungrateful? Who got him into power the first place? He is the one that should be grateful to the rakyat for voting him in.
*
Nonsense. Refer to my earlier post. I mentioned that he could have always opted to rule like Saddam Hussein or Mugabe. Instead, he ruled the country like a true inspiring leader and introduced Malaysia to the world map.

QUOTE(DarkNite @ Apr 13 2012, 06:27 AM)
He should NOT be place on a pedestal and be worshiped.
He is not infallible. He has made mistakes which affect the Rakyat drastically!
*
Of course he's made mistake. He himself admitted it. Two of them is appointing Badawi and Anwar as his deputy. Both were ineffective leaders.
Grassmuncher
post Apr 13 2012, 12:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 13 2012, 12:17 PM)
Nonsense. Refer to my earlier post. I mentioned that he could have always opted to rule like Saddam Hussein or Mugabe. Instead, he ruled the country like a true inspiring leader and introduced Malaysia to the world map.
*
That's not the point. The point is he wouldn't even be PM if the rakyat didn't vote BN in or more importantly if UMNO General Assembly didn't vote him as UMNO President. He wouldn't even have the choice to become Saddam or Mugabe v2.

That being said, I'm not so sure if he has successfully introduced Malaysia to the world map, there are still many omputeh that have no idea what is Malaysia.
Olida
post Apr 13 2012, 12:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Grassmuncher @ Apr 13 2012, 12:39 PM)
That's not the point. The point is he wouldn't even be PM if the rakyat didn't vote BN in or more importantly if UMNO General Assembly didn't vote him as UMNO President. He wouldn't even have the choice to become Saddam or Mugabe v2.

That being said, I'm not so sure if he has successfully introduced Malaysia to the world map, there are still many omputeh that have no idea what is Malaysia.
*
Yes, but he could have chose the path of Saddam or Mugabe or Kim Jong Il and abolish democracy, considering that he is a supporter of China's one party system. We must be thankful for that.

He has introduced Malaysia to the world map. The ones who still who do not who are Malaysians, are most like Americans. We know how good they are in geography. whistling.gif
cypher
post Apr 13 2012, 12:45 PM

CYPHER - CRAPPY SPEAKER
*******
Senior Member
2,118 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malaysia



BN and PR people can't work together for the rakyat.

That's true story...

This post has been edited by cypher: Apr 13 2012, 12:45 PM
syabilng
post Apr 13 2012, 12:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Eastern Kingdom

QUOTE(cypher @ Apr 13 2012, 12:45 PM)
BN and PR people can't work together for the rakyat.

That's true story...
*
user posted image
Grassmuncher
post Apr 13 2012, 01:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


QUOTE(Olida @ Apr 13 2012, 12:41 PM)
Yes, but he could have chose the path of Saddam or Mugabe or Kim Jong Il and abolish democracy, considering that he is a supporter of China's one party system. We must be thankful for that.

He has introduced Malaysia to the world map. The ones who still who do not who are Malaysians, are most like Americans. We know how good they are in geography.  whistling.gif
*
laugh.gif

Did you even understand what I posted?

This post has been edited by Grassmuncher: Apr 13 2012, 01:35 PM
Olida
post Apr 13 2012, 08:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
From: Kajang


QUOTE(Grassmuncher @ Apr 13 2012, 01:34 PM)
laugh.gif

Did you even understand what I posted?
*
Yes, I do understand it, and I do understand the subliminal message you've inserted inside there as well. wink.gif

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0369sec    0.61    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:01 PM