Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Rimba Residence @ Bandar Kinrara (BK5)
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 11:35 AM
|
|
QUOTE(xbryanleex @ May 21 2012, 11:24 AM) Wrote an email to Knox about the internal misconduct of 'cable' purchase. Till today they still not replying my email. Think if this is the attitude of the developer really have to rethink if whether to buy even they have units available. Wow I want to give you due respect for writing the email, even though obviously this has gone to waste. All the related projects they do such practice, though it is not officially written anyway but this is a standard modus operandi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 12:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xbryanleex @ May 21 2012, 11:59 AM) It just like a case of giving bribe to police. You may say everyone is doing it, but it may not mean it right. Right is right wrong is wrong there is nothing call everyone doing it mean it right. My view is that this is not something the developers will do anything about. The only viable way to have it fixed is to have the policy makers implementing some rules/regulations to enforce this, for example requires all bookings' fully auditable and transparent, sales chart must be reflective of actual bookings, bookings cannot be transfered and must be return back to developer etc etc. But too bad lar, the policymakers are vested with other interested so this route is also not workable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 12:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(takky @ May 21 2012, 12:15 PM) Well, they can do all these internal launching/booking, I not so care about it if they leave around 50% of the units for the public to have a chance to grab a unit. now it is left less than 20% for the public to grab, this is just not fair for the public especially those really looking for own stay. might as well just sell all to internal and don't ever publish it to the public. They are sellers they can choose to sell to anyone first or later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 02:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(takky @ May 21 2012, 02:17 PM) i just don't get it, if the property is not hot, even doing internal launching wont help at all, all the investors with the correct brain analysis also wont buy it. if the property is hot, thousands will rush to buy it, not even need the internal/vip launch. in fact, all these are on the favors of the vips. It's about creating competition. The early investors got an advantage, either in the price and/or selecting the choice units, so they are much more willing to go in, early. Worse if the property can transfer name they can also dispose it with some undertable money. Then when it's open to the public, the public got an impressive that it is a hot selling property, so they are also much more willing to commit to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 03:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mikken @ May 21 2012, 02:58 PM) Is this the most anticipated high rise deal thus far in 2012? It seemed it is. Haha. Seriously interested. Haha it's just the opposite to me, I am not interested ! All the taikors say it's for own stay, so I don't need another place which is near the air hitam forest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 03:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mikken @ May 21 2012, 03:24 PM) Puchongite taikor, I think this is good flipping play. So many ppl interested in own stay. Don't think there will be lack of sub-sale buyers later on. Don't tembak me, just personal opinion. My cable not strong and by the time I got the unit ( if at all can get ), it's already "sau sui" or "mui choi". This post has been edited by puchongite: May 21 2012, 03:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 04:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(swisspalm @ May 21 2012, 03:58 PM) i am interested to get a unit, anyone want to let go? please pm me, thanks. This is a property which if you are interested, you have to be pro-active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 08:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(zeroviperx @ May 21 2012, 08:07 PM) In the end of the day, I guess it all ends up with willing buyer willing seller, regardless how the market will go, it is always demand vs supply. It has always been that simple. It's more than just that. It's willing buyers and willing sellers plus the game field which they buyers and sellers are standing on. Is the field a level playing field, or a skewed field ? That has a major impact on how the game will be played.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 08:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(zeroviperx @ May 21 2012, 08:27 PM) If we found out that it is a skewed field, we then abandon the field and move on. Plenty of choices out there bro  That's a passive consumer's reaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 08:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xbryanleex @ May 21 2012, 08:36 PM) Added on May 21, 2012, 8:38 pmDoesnt matter passive or active, we r no beggar we dont beg. When we felt that they worth more than it should be then avoid it. That is smart consumer. Did not advocate begging or anything like that. Just saying that walking away from unfair deal is a basic passive behavior. You can still call it smart but an active behavior could be :- 1. Educate and unite all other consumers to boycott it. 2. Go to the developer and demand a fairer playing field. 3. Go to the policy makers to demand regulatory/law changes to block this behavior and plug all the loopholes. 4. So on and so forth. It all depends on how "passive" you are or how "active" you are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 21 2012, 09:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(1282009 @ May 21 2012, 09:16 PM) So buy or not or boycott or not lol I am already not buying. Not trying to boycott or what. I don't see me having any advantage getting into game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 22 2012, 01:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kimmo88 @ May 22 2012, 01:34 PM) I've posted earlier some info about the developer of RR claiming it is related or even the same entity as the developer of Sierra Residency (SR) but kena shot down by taikors in this forum saying they are not related: 1. SR and RR's office are in the same location: SR Developer office: Pembinaan Sierra Mal Sdn. Bhd. (TAIPAN USJ) 52, 2nd Floor, Jalan USJ 10/1B, 47620 Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. Tel: 03-56356268 RR Developer office: KNOX SIERRA SDN BHD 38B, Jalan USJ 10/1B, 47620 Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan 2. SierraMal's initial plan for the site of RR in 2010 submitted to MPSJ due to BK5B residents complain. Initial blueprint of RR site in 2010 and MPSJ letter located here: http://forum.bandarkinrara.com/index.php?t...4;boardseen#newCan you please spare us the torture of reading the entire bandarkinrara.com forum ? Get to the meat of the issue, which article exactly which is relevant to this topic ? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 22 2012, 02:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kimmo88 @ May 22 2012, 01:43 PM) sorry bro..edited my earlier post OK, site seems to be the RR site. So looks like RR developer is the reborn of SR developer. Maybe they have injected new capital, new directors and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 22 2012, 02:50 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nkhong @ May 22 2012, 02:48 PM) Aiyo, I am just a small fly how to sue them. Is their right to choose who they want to sell to. Actually I haven't seen any post which says want to sue the developer. Where is the post ? This post has been edited by puchongite: May 22 2012, 02:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 22 2012, 03:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(zeroviperx @ May 22 2012, 03:02 PM) Not sue lar, wanna 'complain' only larrrrrr hahahaahah Exactly. Eventually, it is more like grumble only. Seriously don't think can find any basis. The weakest link, if I may guess, is the taking early order thingie, even if it is put under a stakeholder. Pardon my ignorance, haven't seen bigger developers practising this yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 22 2012, 04:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(takky @ May 22 2012, 04:07 PM) really? however I cant load it. edit: the website is up now. Haha the trees do not look like tropical rain forest lar. Tropical rain forest where got so orderly and neat one ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 23 2012, 12:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(fbb @ May 23 2012, 11:56 AM) As far as my reliable source said, even the investors who bought from them are not allowed to transfer name , thus minimum chances for any flipping for under table. That's probably on the surface lar. If they just accept a cheque and put a sticker on the sales chart or a tick on some excel spread sheet, then there is no traceability when people flip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 23 2012, 05:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(fbb @ May 23 2012, 05:31 PM) That is what I heard too. If any WCt Realtors' agents or developer staffs caught taking under table or flipping for profit, it will be immediate termination. How do account for those posts appeared in LYN for KR1/2 where people posts for having booked early units and asking for undertable money to flip ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 23 2012, 05:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(twincharger07 @ May 23 2012, 05:43 PM) they asked.. but was it successful?  I have no idea because there is no way for me to know if it went through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
May 28 2012, 05:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sidabu @ May 28 2012, 05:35 PM) Does anyone know the actual site of the RR? SA mentioned close to Sierra residency past the dead end. Hope someone has a pic of the site? Thanks in advance. Try this map which I drew it sometime ago ( subsequently also added Duet Residence on the map ) :- https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF&msa=...cee5582266&z=14
|
|
|
|
|