QUOTE(mabaw @ Apr 9 2012, 07:24 PM)
5k lah.kedai dekat jitra sana.kena sapu already if not mistaken

Soli soli... Wrong info given plak!
QUOTE(glamour @ Apr 9 2012, 07:36 PM)
to all the sifu here
i'm planning to upgrade my frame to Santa Cruz SuperLight
but i'm not sure i should go for 26er or 29er
cause end of this month....KSH will have 29er Superlight
i'm more intro XC ride going down fast....
please advise...
I think the more appropriate question would be why SC Superlight? LOL... It's a single pivot 4" bike. It's cheaper maintainence no doubt with just a pair of large bearings, but how's the ride quality compared to those newer multi linked bikes? Bobbing issues?
QUOTE(glamour @ Apr 10 2012, 01:16 AM)
Cause Santa Cruz 29er only arrive in Malaysia end of this april. I worry I get 26er, later in the future everybody using 29er. Not so rich to upgrade again. You tested 29er?
Bike shops objective is to sell in order to make profit. Don't fall into the trap. I'm not saying 29er is inferior or superior to 26er. Try it or atlest do some research online on the feedbacks.
Based on the geo charts, the 29er SCSL will be slightly more stable on speed due to the big wheel and longer wheelbase. The bad part is a longer wheelbase will also be harder to manuvere on tight trails and less flickable with a longer CS. You may think you're an XC rider and don't put much concern on flickability, but what makes a ride fun is to be able to make the bike do what you want with urgency, not driving a trailer kinda slow response, rite?
The BB is higher on the 29er SCSL though. Good thing about higher BB is less pedal strikes on tech terrains, but on the expense of cornering stability.
I find it funny that the geo charts in SC website states both 29er and 26er's A2C length is the same at 470mm. It's common A2C length of 470mm for a 26er with 100mm travel unsagged. But a 29er 100mm fork should be longer. A 470mm unsagged A2C length is typical of a 80mm travel 29er fork. Maybe you could send an email to SC and clarify that matter?