QUOTE(zero_hour @ Mar 15 2012, 11:13 AM)
Not necessarily true. At under 2k RPM you can already go 90-100 km/h without engaging the turbo. Turbo tend to get high FC because ppl who drive turbo like to tekan.QUOTE(JC999 @ Mar 15 2012, 11:17 AM)
Im quoting the FC on the spec sheet above, 6.5l/100km @90km, isn't this display a bullshit and nonsense. There is no proper evaluation method on their FC and they just put 6.5l/100km @90km, there should be an urban cycle as well i think quoting 6.5l/100km is very misleading. and base on the spec sheet, the IAFM engine consumes even less fuel at 6.1km/100km.
I never heard of any current IAFM owners saying that their FC is good, and base on the spec sheet. the CFE consumes more... so what does it tell me, FC is worse than the IAFM?
Fair enough. I agree marketing figures are often misleading.I never heard of any current IAFM owners saying that their FC is good, and base on the spec sheet. the CFE consumes more... so what does it tell me, FC is worse than the IAFM?
I misunderstood that you mean CFE must have higher FC than IAFM+.
Mar 15 2012, 11:25 AM

Quote
0.0448sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled