Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

134 Pages « < 117 118 119 120 121 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2012 Honda Civic Malaysian Version Revealed!, Here's how our new civic will look like!

views
     
jjchew88
post Oct 22 2013, 04:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(viking kong @ Oct 22 2013, 04:39 PM)
Cheers Bro,
Which words that showed I'm emotional? haha
Anyway, I just curious when people said Gen 8 more powerful than Gen 9 because it's DOHC.

But the info from Honda showed, HP is same for both while torque Gen 9 have extra 2 than Gen 8.
Please elaborate, saya budak baru belajar.

However, Civic US aka gen9.5(perhaps) is gorgeous. Anybody have info, it this version coming to m'sia or not?
*
SOHC has a characteristic of better pickup from stationary compare to DOHC (low rev).

DOHC has more omph during high rev
yayiyu99
post Oct 22 2013, 04:59 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
958 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(jjchew88 @ Oct 22 2013, 04:46 PM)
SOHC has a characteristic of better pickup from stationary compare to DOHC (low rev).

DOHC has more omph during high rev
*
If the current civic have the choice between DOHC & SOHC with similar price, most people will choose the DOHC version
viking kong
post Oct 22 2013, 05:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


QUOTE(jjchew88 @ Oct 22 2013, 04:46 PM)
SOHC has a characteristic of better pickup from stationary compare to DOHC (low rev).

DOHC has more omph during high rev
*
Can you explain in layman. (note...we are talking on civic 2.0 Dohc vs civic 2.0 Sohc ya)

Such as... when you potong other car you need pickup, so sohc better.
When you drive 150kmh... Dohc engine still quiet but sohc have some noise and berat. Long term..civic dohc engine will lasting than civic sohc. (Example)
M3White
post Oct 22 2013, 11:37 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(viking kong @ Oct 22 2013, 05:03 PM)
Can you explain in layman. (note...we are talking on civic 2.0 Dohc vs civic 2.0 Sohc ya)

Such as... when you potong other car you need pickup, so sohc better.
When you drive 150kmh... Dohc engine still quiet but sohc have some noise and berat. Long term..civic dohc engine will lasting than civic sohc. (Example)
*
Bro,
Simple layman language lah ye.....
HP or PS or whatever measurement indicator..... all stated on paper.
Example 155PS in Toyota, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, KIA, Hyndai, VW, Peugeot & many brands.
Not all the same even though it is the same in numbering "155"
Again, layman language, your Size is L for John Master, it might be XL size if it's Charlie brand
But if u bring your body & tested... your ll not really emphasis on L or XL but fix & comfort.

SOHC vs DOHC
which 1 better in overall?

Civic FD - Gen 8 (2005-2009) & Gen 8.5 (FL Model, 2009-2012) series
1.8i & 1.8L (Both SOHC)
2.0 & 2.0 M Concept (DOHC)
Why Honda made SOHC for 1.8 & not DOHC?
or both DOHC for 1.8 & 2.0?

Civic FB (2012-now)
1.8 & 2.0 (Both SOHC)
How can u be sure of performance?
i) Try to get any 2.0 DOHC from friend or tested from used car
ii) Again tested 2.0 SOHC

You can feel the difference by your own.
Me, tested both & my experience :
i) 2.0 SOHC not that powerful compare to 2.0 DOHC
ii) Ask honest Honda mechanic, ensure No bias element, He ll tell u, 2.0 SOHC FC slightly lower as well as power.

If u happy with Gen 9 design, SOHC engine & low FC, then go for Gen 9
If u ask when new FL ll be available (Gen 9.5), I don't think u ll get the answer
But if u follow the automobile rythm, u can see, whatever model launch in Thailand, ll be in Malaysia 6-12 mths.

If Honda Msia leak info, Gen 9.5 ll be launched soon, mean they prepared to suicide!
Me, at 1st place, I though Gen 8 & FL model quite old (2005-2012), I am about to wait for new model Gen 9, wait since 2011, tiba-tiba, I saw Gen 9 in US, India & later on Thailand... that moment, I make up my mind to Buy Gen 8FL (FD2).
I used for 9 mths & experience
FC in long distance very save 16 cents/km
only town very 22-25 cents/km
I hunt for the answer & finally get 1 which made me satisfy
U look for low FC, go for Vios, MyVi for Viva even better.

U want performance 2.0 DOHC, a friend of mine expert in Honda servicing told me SOHC Jimat FC but less power.

I strongly believe u bukan budak-budak, buying RM100K++ toys is not a joke.
Tested, make up your mind & buy....
If u want Urgent, buy now but if u can wait, surely there ll be FB2 but no one can tell exept:
1) God
2) Honda CEO
3) Time to tell

Sorry bcoz saying emotional...... but my intention just contribute some idea as sharing in this forum

If I were u now, I ll consider Mazda 3 (skyactiv 2.0) as low as Vios the FC
World top 10 engine & superb design vs Civic Gen9

Mazda good in design, engine, handling, performance but poor in Resell Value
M3White
post Oct 22 2013, 11:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(viking kong @ Oct 22 2013, 05:03 PM)
Can you explain in layman. (note...we are talking on civic 2.0 Dohc vs civic 2.0 Sohc ya)

Such as... when you potong other car you need pickup, so sohc better.
When you drive 150kmh... Dohc engine still quiet but sohc have some noise and berat. Long term..civic dohc engine will lasting than civic sohc. (Example)
*
2.0 DOHC, my experience
I over take a car in high way, the driver unhappy & over take me
Again, when I tried to over take him, he change gear & go very fast
I then switch gear to "S" mode, click -ve
Result : The car suddently dissapear from my backview mirror
It is happened in my 2.0 DOHC but I when I tested 2.0 SOHC in Honda showroom, I dont feel SOHC can do that.
allenultra
post Oct 23 2013, 12:12 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,027 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh



For those who want to read on SOHC vs DOHC.

http://paultan.org/2005/06/22/sohc-vs-dohc-valvetrains/
zweimmk
post Oct 23 2013, 10:04 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Overall, the new Civic takes a step back in many areas when compared to other similar C segment cars such as the 408, Jetta, Focus. Haven't seen the new Corolla Altis, new Slyphy or new Mazda 3 yet so can't comment on those.

- Interior dash quality
- No more fold down seats (WTH?)
- Engine. But no doubt the R series engine is better for FC. Those who wants to mod their car will be very sorely disappointed the number of things they can do compared to the K series engine.
- Small boot
- QC, many many complaints about finishing, gaps, i-mid errors etc.

Even as an co-owner of a 1.8FB, I'd have to say its a very poor effort by Honda this time round :/
romuluz777
post Oct 23 2013, 10:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Wait for Civic 10th Gen with 2.0 EDT engine.
M3White
post Oct 23 2013, 10:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(allenultra @ Oct 23 2013, 12:12 AM)
For those who want to read on SOHC vs DOHC.

http://paultan.org/2005/06/22/sohc-vs-dohc-valvetrains/
*
Thanks Bro for the above link, very clear explaination
As a conclusion

2.O SOHC
PRO
i) Pick up better in "low-end" mode, like city driving, stuck in the trafic jam
ii) Low FC in city drive due to low RPM in city driving
CON
i) Highway (less power & high FC)
ii) Long distance "high-end" driving in high way (100km/h & above), high RPM causing high FC

As my conclusion, SOHC suitable for:
i) City driving
ii) Drive that not really emphasis on "Speed" (120km/h & below)


jjchew88
post Oct 23 2013, 04:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(viking kong @ Oct 22 2013, 05:03 PM)
Can you explain in layman. (note...we are talking on civic 2.0 Dohc vs civic 2.0 Sohc ya)

Such as... when you potong other car you need pickup, so sohc better.
When you drive 150kmh... Dohc engine still quiet but sohc have some noise and berat. Long term..civic dohc engine will lasting than civic sohc. (Example)
*
when u want to over take other from 80km/h, DOHC defitnely give u more punch

SOHC pick up advantage only apply when the car is stationary, it does not apply when u are cruising around 100km/h and wanted pick up to 120km/h etc. DOHC shines out in the scenario of 100km/h -> 120km/h etc

and as other forumers said about FC, SOHC consume lesser fuel during city drive. However, during constant highway cruising DOHC and SOHC has not much difference.


jjchew88
post Oct 23 2013, 04:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Oct 23 2013, 10:04 AM)
Overall, the new Civic takes a step back in many areas when compared to other similar C segment cars such as the 408, Jetta, Focus. Haven't seen the new Corolla Altis, new Slyphy or new Mazda 3 yet so can't comment on those.

- Interior dash quality
- No more fold down seats (WTH?)
- Engine. But no doubt the R series engine is better for FC. Those who wants to mod their car will be very sorely disappointed the number of things they can do compared to the K series engine.
- Small boot
- QC, many many complaints about finishing, gaps, i-mid errors etc.

Even as an co-owner of a 1.8FB, I'd have to say its a very poor effort by Honda this time round :/
*
yes, agree on this.

9 gen civic really ripped off by the 8/8.5 gen in following areas:

- Interior dash/ buttons/ handbreak quality
- QC! the gaps in the 9 gen is really doh.gif from bumper to interiors.. seriously sweat.gif
- No more fold down seats
- cut down from more potential K engine hmm.gif



viking kong
post Oct 23 2013, 08:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


QUOTE(M3White @ Oct 22 2013, 11:37 PM)
Bro,
Simple layman language lah ye.....
HP or PS or whatever measurement indicator..... all stated on paper.
Example 155PS in , Toyota, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, KIA, Hyndai, VW, Peugeot & many brands.
Not all the same even though it is the same in numbering "155"

We r talking about Honda 2.0 Sohc and Honda 2.0 Dohc. Not Toyota, Mazda, proton. kia and etc.

user posted image

This is what Honda advertised worldwide. If incorrect or just on paper, they shud kena sue. Update. Nobody sue Honda about this

Again, layman language, your Size is L for John Master, it might be XL size if it's Charlie brand
But if u bring your body & tested... your ll not really emphasis on L or XL but fix & comfort.
thumbup.gif You light up my life bro

SOHC vs DOHC
which 1 better in overall?

Civic FD - Gen 8 (2005-2009) & Gen 8.5 (FL Model, 2009-2012) series
1.8i & 1.8L (Both SOHC)
2.0 & 2.0 M Concept (DOHC)
Why Honda made SOHC for 1.8 & not DOHC?
or both DOHC for 1.8 & 2.0?
We are talking about 2.0 not 1.8.

Civic FB (2012-now)
1.8 & 2.0 (Both SOHC)
How can u be sure of performance?
i) Try to get any 2.0 DOHC from friend or tested from used car
ii) Again tested 2.0 SOHC
i)I don't know the performance because never test. If i test, sure I rembat kaw kaw until maximum. Can test your car? biggrin.gif 
ii)Any SA can give me a test drive to rembat...? If I dont rembat sure I dont know whether sohc can perform or not 

You can feel the difference by your own.
Me, tested both & my experience :
i) 2.0 SOHC not that powerful compare to 2.0 DOHC
ii) Ask honest Honda mechanic, ensure No bias element, He ll tell u, 2.0 SOHC FC slightly lower as well as power.
i)Thanks for your opinion.
ii) Theory wise is like that la. How about Dohc year 2001 technology compare with Sohc 2012 technology?

If u happy with Gen 9 design, SOHC engine & low FC, then go for Gen 9
Im happy with Civic US design. But no choice

If u ask when new FL ll be available (Gen 9.5), I don't think u ll get the answer
But if u follow the automobile rythm, u can see, whatever model launch in Thailand, ll be in Malaysia 6-12 mths.
When honda start to give 8-10k discounts, it's time for new facelift to come.

If Honda Msia leak info, Gen 9.5 ll be launched soon, mean they prepared to suicide!
Me, at 1st place, I though Gen 8 & FL model quite old (2005-2012), I am about to wait for new model Gen 9, wait since 2011, tiba-tiba, I saw Gen 9 in US, India & later on Thailand... that moment, I make up my mind to Buy Gen 8FL (FD2).
I used for 9 mths & experience
FC in long distance very save 16 cents/km
only town very 22-25 cents/km
I hunt for the answer & finally get 1 which made me satisfy
U look for low FC, go for Vios, MyVi for Viva even better.

U want performance 2.0 DOHC, a friend of mine expert in Honda servicing told me SOHC Jimat FC but less power.
Your Honda expert friend just said.... SOHC Jimat FC but less power.??? That all? doh.gif

I strongly believe u bukan budak-budak, buying RM100K++ toys is not a joke.
Tested, make up your mind & buy....
If u want Urgent, buy now but if u can wait, surely there ll be FB2 but no one can tell exept:
1) God
2) Honda CEO
3) Time to tell
Thanks

Sorry bcoz saying emotional...... but my intention just contribute some idea as sharing in this forum
It's ok, once I buy 2.0 fb, then we can test drag.

If I were u now, I ll consider Mazda 3 (skyactiv 2.0) as low as Vios the FC
World top 10 engine & superb design vs Civic Gen9

Mazda good in design, engine, handling, performance but poor in Resell Value
Agreed.
*
viking kong
post Oct 23 2013, 09:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


QUOTE(M3White @ Oct 23 2013, 10:57 AM)
Thanks Bro for the above link, very clear explaination
As a conclusion

2.O SOHC
PRO
i) Pick up better in "low-end" mode, like city driving, stuck in the trafic jam
ii) Low FC in city drive due to low RPM in city driving
CON
i) Highway (less power & high FC)
ii) Long distance "high-end" driving in high way (100km/h & above), high RPM causing high FC

As my conclusion, SOHC suitable for:
i) City driving
ii) Drive that not really emphasis on "Speed" (120km/h & below)
*
Yes. The article is correct in general term.
Out off topic..
I remember last 2 years when Honda produce CBR250r Single cylinder 2011. People compare with successful Kawasaki Ninja 250r with 2 cylinder 2008.
It's almost the same scenario with sohc vs dohc debate.

1 cylinder - save fuel but need to sacrifice the hp. Engine vibrate also very high.
2 cylinders - for performance but minyak a little bit kuat.

Result in real life,

Top speed for both almost same. 160kmh.
Torque cbr win.
No high vibration as claimed in the engine for cbr.
cbr more fuel saving and euro3 complied.

Why this happen? it's technology and it's Honda.

M3White
post Oct 24 2013, 02:37 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(viking kong @ Oct 23 2013, 09:11 PM)
Yes. The article is correct in general term.
Out off topic..
I remember last 2 years when Honda produce CBR250r Single cylinder 2011. People compare with successful Kawasaki Ninja 250r with 2 cylinder 2008.
It's almost the same scenario with sohc vs dohc debate.

1 cylinder - save fuel but need to sacrifice the hp. Engine vibrate also very high.
2 cylinders - for performance but minyak a little bit kuat.

Result in real life,

Top speed for both almost same. 160kmh.
Torque cbr win.
No high vibration as claimed in the engine for cbr.
cbr more fuel saving and euro3 complied.

Why this happen? it's technology and it's Honda.
*
Bro,
Y I bought 2.0 Gen 8 FL (Gen 8.5) where I suppose to get all new fresh model?
Actually very RUGI buying expired model Gen 8.5 for the last batch 2012
I bought the last unit of 2012 & it is discontiue.

At 1st place I wanted to buy on 2010, that moment I heard a romour all new Gen 9 ll be born.
Closed my eyes, should be SEKSI but when they launch in US, seem like SEKSA
Aft that, I read 1 US website saying 50,000 units recall, again India Plant was shut down due to low demand.
When they launched in Thailand, I wait untill SA said last unit left without discount (where got clearance without discount)?
Only successful model in Gen 8
Once they launched in Msia, I heard respond so slow.
I brought my friend to test drive Accord 2.4 lately & he saw Gen 9, He said this City should discontinue bcoz too old (actually Gen 9 with City face). I hate the tail bcoz look like Persona.
Nanti people said Persona, I ll suicide with RM130K
Inside very small, especially back seat.
Material very low grade and someon whisper, it's a downgrade version bcoz Honda reduce cost to compete but NOT in Msia
I decided to test drive and I am very Happy bcoz I own better model, with better quality & it is DOHC...
I tested & result is very much difference in Power for DOHC

If I am buying a car now, I ll consider
All new Altis (fresh sexy model, good FC & Resell) but remain same VVTi engine
or Mazda 3 skyactiv salon, sexy, low FC, fresh design & all fresh engine with high performance
Don;t worry resell value bcoz u buy for ur self
Those ppl buy H & T, they are actually buying for others (next buyer-resell value)

Look at Mazda 3 skyactiv like a Pampers (Pakai Buang)
HaHaHa
Wait for Budget to drop the price
viking kong
post Oct 24 2013, 12:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


Firstly, beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder.

For your info, even people said gen 9 is getting ugly, the demand are still high. With the ugly looks, Civic gen 9 is still the best c-segment sales in M'sia. rclxms.gif

Size wise,
4,525mm in length, 1,755mm in width and 1,430mm in height for Gen 9
4,540mm, 1,755mm, and 1,435mm for Gen 8
From the overall data, Gen 8 more spacious (little bit)

but honestly, the rear legroom gen 9 still feels just as spacious as gen 8. Here are the changes in the cabin layout compared to the 8th Gen based on honda data not by SA or honda technician at SC. (please dont said it's only just on paper ya biggrin.gif )

Shoulder room improved by 75mm
Couple distance improved by 10mm
Cabin length to the back of the rear seats improved by 10mm
Rear legroom improved by 40mm
The floor space of the cabin is now 5mm lower for the front and 15mm lower for the rear, meaning more ambiance space inside.
The front seats are positioned 5mm further in front


How they do it? It's Honda.

The pro's of Gen 9 over Gen 8.

1. Redesigned the A pillar that this has significantly reduced blind spot. The width of the A pillar in that area has been reduced by as much as 9% and this has resulted in a 36% improvement in visibility.
2. i-MID (Intelligent-Multi Information Display)
3. Keyless Entry and Push Start button.
4. ECON green button
5. Color changing speed display
6. After sales service, 5 year warranty with unlimited mileage, maintenance interval 10,000km, Free labour service up to 6 visits for every alternate paid service until 100,000km
7. etc... cannot remember
M3White
post Oct 25 2013, 12:13 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


Bro,
Legroom improve space improve but Headroom too small (if u r 4.5 fts & taller, u need to adjust your head while enter/inside the car.
Seem like many non important improvement
But non of the Honda salesman ll said new Gen9 cut cost
Ugly
Beauty always in the eyes of the beholder but many eyes agreed on the uglyness og Gen9, including me.
U wanna get improvement spec, Honda salesman ll
but if u wanna get down grade in, othe brands' salesman ll tell u

Seem like u are very Drunk of this Civic Persona Gen 9
If Tiara or Saga SV put emblem of Civic, sale also good
it is a power of Brand
viking kong
post Oct 25 2013, 09:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


Where is dohc vs sohc?hehe
Beauty is subjective. My eyes, gen9 dashboard is beauty & nice compare to gen 8. Outside look is average same like gen8. Both cars have their own character.
To be honest, 95% of people that saying gen 9 is ugly and condemm the car is gen8 owner. I dont know why, maybe trying to maintain the 2nd hand value?
Again, gen9 is still hot cake with highest sales for c segment in our country mean its not ugly. Who want to spend 130k for ugly car?
1 bad thing is the price tag. Honda msia take advantage for H brand. Lancer GT 2.0 120k cbu japan, ford focus titanium 2.0 115k with lot of feature.
viking kong
post Oct 25 2013, 11:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


Copy paste from other forum. Reviewed by owner who owned Gen8 and Gen9 1.8. He covers almost all aspects for typical user except dohc and sohc.

Salam fellow PWers!

Here goes a small effort of mine for a comparison between the Honda Civic 8th gen and the 9th gen. The pictorial differences are already obvious though, won't be going to them. Instead, I'll just share my own experience, the driving feel and the differences between the cars that can't actually be explained by pictures. Some practical observations you can say.

When the 8th gen was launched, it was a big upgrade and enhancement in almost every single aspect than the old 7th gen. The looks, size, engine, transmission, interior, exterior, everything seemed like a NEW civic altogether. Nothing resembled like the old one. Even an uneducated person could tell the difference and praised it as a LOT better.

Though, this isn't the case when it comes to 9th gen civic. People haven't been praising it, over 95% of the people are actually preferring 8th gen over 9th gen. But I must say, for a person who has been used to 8th gen in terms of daily driven vehicles, its a really significant upgrade.

My observation is based on a comparison vs Oriel manual 8th gen and Oriel Prosmatec 9th gen; somewhat an "odd" couple of trims as people may say, but to me, it feels quite ok if one has to judge the drive, ride quality and significant improvements over the time. I have tried to cover almost everything, wasn't easy to distribute the information under different headings, but still I did try, I hope its not as difficult to understand as I think.

Ride Quality/Drive experience:

The ride quality, driving experience, the stability etc is very much different than the 8th generation. The suspension is quite a lot softer, the ride feeling is leaned towards the family sedan concept rather than the sportiness, the characteristic honda civic drive. I drove it on motorway, at speeds exceeding 170-180kph, on stock eurostars, the stability was impressive. Comparing it to the 8th gen's factor, its stability I don't consider questionable owing to the factor of a hard suspension system.

Its more like a sweet combination of sport and comfort. At crusing speeds of 100-120kph, the car feels as smooth as it could ever be. No uncomfortable feelings at all even on the roads having worst cover of tar and potholes. 8th gen civic felt uncomfortable to me at those roads, esp in my hometown area, @ahmadbila knows what I am talking about.

Also, I am used to travelling in the 8th gen since quite a while now, and I always feel tired after a journey of 3-4 hours. The roads aren't driver friendly here. But kust as I felt fresh after the same drive in a friends altis, it was a refreshing experience on the 9th gen as well. Probably cz of the excitement (lol) but I think the suspension is a great improvement, an overhaul.

Engine/Power-train:

Coming to the engine, as we all know, the engine hasn't been changed over the generation. Its the same 1799cc R18a iVTEC motor. Therefore the power remains almost the same. Power/weight ratio isn't much different either. However, the prosmatec 9th gen I drove gave me a very clear and obvious idea of one good change over the time, and thats the reduced transmission lags. I dont really know the technical values, its just a clear observation off my experience with both. Gear ratios are essentially the same, in both manual and prosmatec, nothing is changed as such. But the feel when you floor a 9th gen civic is totally different. Its much MORE responsive at low rpms, the ivtec function disengages more swiftly and delivers power in lesser time than the 8th gen, i.e, if you need to escape a situation or you need to take panga (), just floor it and you won't notice it crossing the speeds of 130-140kph, simply effortless.

I experienced a few friendly runs with 8th gen oriel manual and 9th gen oriel prosmatec, I must say, unless there is a very experienced swift shifter behind the 8th gen's wheel, the 9th gen keeps the run neck to neck at almost all speeds, at least thats what I saw upto 160kph on a normal road, not motorway.

Fuel economy:

The most important part, fuel economy. Its obvious, 9th gen's comparison vs the 8th gen in terms of that isn't quite justified.
Despite being a prosmatec, the 9th gen delivered a lot better mileage figures than the 8th gen. The part that I loved the most was the fact that 9th gen's mileage figures actually vary with driving styles. With the 8th gen, varying driving styles wasn't much of a technique to improve the mileage.

The motor has been tweaked such has to behave like a gas guzzler at speeds and high rpms (bombastic driving in short) and to serve as an economy vehicle with smooth, balanced driving.

If the 8th gen was driven anything above 120, the mileage figurs would always be around 11-13kpl, nothing more than that. but if the 9th gen is driven, lets say at a constant speed of 120kph, its possible to acheive more than 15-16kpl on a prosmatec transmission without much hassle of hypermiling. Econ is a very nice feature, its one of the big highlights serving as a reason for the 8th-9th upgrade.

Braking:

Braking, in the 8th gen civic era, it was probably the best stock braking system that was equipped in the car. Nothing braked like an 8th gen civic. For the 9th gen, the braking is very well up to the mark even with crap eurostars. I had a few close encounters in one of the most pathetic driving conditions in Pakistan and the braking served very well.

One thing I did notice was the sound of ABS kicking in. The 8th gen civic sound could be heard like a significant "grr grr grr" but in he 9th gen, its HARDLY even noticeable as a noise. A regular driver would need a lot of keen observation to notice the system coming into play.

Cabin Noise:

Cabin noise, this is the thing I loved a lot about the 9th gen. The engine revving above 4k rpms on a highway is a lot quiter than the 8th gen. Loved it. When pushed above 170 kph, there was only a slight sound of vroom inside the cabin and the song that played from the stock audio was still enjoyable.

Road Clearance:

The road clearance of the 9th gen is to die for, esp after one has experienced an 8th gen as a family sedan. I drove it with 5 people, it felt totally perfect, didn't bother touching any of the normally designed speed breakers. For the oddly placed ones, like designed by sheeda mochi in front of his shop etc, its a different case though.

Visibility; Day/Night:

The visibilty has been improved a lot. The corners, pillar blind spots etc have minimized significantly, thanks to the bigger pillar glasses. The car feels a bit compact than the 8th gen when driving through dense traffic, more like a honda city.

For the night, well I must say that projector lamps serve a lot in nght driving, headlight visibilty range is better than normal parabolic lamps. The cut off is sharp, even when used with HIDs, functions excellent.

The interior:

Yes writing specially about this thing, the interior is a lot classier than the 8th gen civic. Feels a bit too cozy though, but its the way its styled to be. Doesn't feel odd at all. After being in a 9th gen, almost every other PKDM car of this class feels primitive. I like it. <3

A few things which I missed and disliked:

The only thing I missed A LOT in the 9th gen was the organ type accelerator pedal. It was very comfortable feature, you could rest your foot on it for prolonged periods of time without feeling itchy and tucky. The 9th gen gas pedal is once again downgraded to a simple one

The dual tip exhaust is also something to be missed.

The rear reading lights are also gone.

Below the climate control buttons, in front of the shift lever, there is around 3 or four square inches of blank space, looked very odd to me.

Looks (a side note):

The only thing that has been criticised a lot about this car is its looks. Esp the exterior. The lifted rear end which resembles the pre-facelift 5th generation honda city. Well, for that I must say, it isn't much of an excuse. After what you're getting in that price tag, looks is the last thing which matters. Especially in Pakistan, where you have ONLY two cars: civic vs altis.

And its something which is gonna fit in your eyes after all. Apni har cheez hoobsoorat lagti hai bhai.

I remember a brother syaing k "6 saal poraani shape se bore nahi huay?" and there was one who said "gari dekhni to doosron ne hoti hai, aapko konsi dikh rahi hoti hai when driving?"

Conclusion:

The 9th gen is an improved vehicle in almost every aspect that matters over its predecessor. Fuel economy, suspension, comfort, features etc; I can't actually think of any reason of NOT upgrading if budget isn't an issue.

I recommend go for it if you have the $$$ and want a change. Its well worth its price tag and will be keeping you happy.



M3White
post Oct 26 2013, 01:21 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(viking kong @ Oct 25 2013, 09:49 AM)

To be honest, 95% of people that saying gen 9 is ugly and condemm the car is gen8 owner.
Where is the source, evident on the statistic of 95%, any research base or studies?

Again, gen9 is still hot cake with highest sales for c segment in our country mean its not ugly. Who want to spend 130k for ugly car?
DIE HARD FAN WILL DO THAT FOR SURE

1 bad thing is the price tag. Honda msia take advantage for H brand.
Price = Demand vs Supply (Tolong Boikot Honda, Surely $ drop)

Lancer GT 2.0 120k cbu japan, ford focus titanium 2.0 115k with lot of feature.
RM115K & RM120K (CBU Japan is high quality & low price), Just Buy It, Value for Money

*
M3White
post Oct 26 2013, 01:28 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


Gen 9 also came with
i) push start
ii) remote to open the boot trunk
So, go & buy.........
Budget is over.....

This post has been edited by M3White: Oct 26 2013, 01:37 AM

134 Pages « < 117 118 119 120 121 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0326sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 11:27 PM