Probably will be more 3K RAM's this/next month.
[Official] LYN DDR3 Discussion Thread, Show or Learn To Overclock Your DDR3!!
[Official] LYN DDR3 Discussion Thread, Show or Learn To Overclock Your DDR3!!
|
|
May 2 2013, 09:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
Probably will be more 3K RAM's this/next month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2013, 11:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
Nickshih on ASRock Z87M OC Formula .......DDR3 @ 3322 MHz
http://www.ocaholic.ch/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6770 |
|
|
May 3 2013, 03:07 AM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Still waiting for some super rams at 3k C10 at 1.65v.
Following latency theory 2k c8 about the same as ddr2 1k c4.... so... 3k c10.. ftw.. CL12 eh... |
|
|
May 3 2013, 12:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
I doubt that 3K C10 will be produced.
atm,C10 is only 2666,even not 2800. This post has been edited by stasio: May 3 2013, 12:29 PM |
|
|
May 3 2013, 12:35 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 4 2013, 03:29 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2013, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
samsung
|
|
|
May 4 2013, 03:41 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(soulfly @ May 4 2013, 03:29 PM) elpidasno the corsair ones are elpidas. rev 4.13 afaik. c11's are samsungs. rev 5.12 http://www.overclock.net/t/1300040/corsair...6-c10-c11/0_100 http://www.hwbox.gr/reviews/19076-corsair-...erformance.html and the tridents are elpidas as well. the 3k c12's will be samsungs.. This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 4 2013, 03:47 PM |
|
|
May 4 2013, 03:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
|
|
|
May 4 2013, 03:48 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
ah crap i kept thinking 4.xx are elpidas..
oops and samsungs were 5 |
|
|
May 4 2013, 03:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
|
|
|
May 4 2013, 04:32 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
well last time all tridents were elpidas bsc etc.
so now they are using samsungs?? |
|
|
May 4 2013, 08:30 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
ah...glad that i bought spare sticks of samsung green before... all are hyk0 1205
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5 2013, 07:38 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ May 4 2013, 04:32 PM) Trident are mix of Elpida BBSE and PSC.Elpida on TridentX is kinda impossible since they filed a bankruptcy in early 2012. TridentX is consisted of Samsung and Hynix. The slowest TridentX 2133C9 is also a Samsung. 2400 looks quite impossible for Elpida @ 1.65v. The last Elpida BBSE was RipjawsX series specifically the 2133C8 kit in 2011. QUOTE(soulfly @ May 4 2013, 08:30 PM) Congrats. Most HYK0 1205 can do 2700+ @ 1.7v+. But what about yours? |
|
|
May 5 2013, 08:17 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 5 2013, 07:38 PM) Trident are mix of Elpida BBSE and PSC. i dont have a decent cpu at the moment, but my sandy bridge pentium can run the ram at 2133 10-11-10-30-1T at only 1.325v memtested and Pi 32MBElpida on TridentX is kinda impossible since they filed a bankruptcy in early 2012. TridentX is consisted of Samsung and Hynix. The slowest TridentX 2133C9 is also a Samsung. 2400 looks quite impossible for Elpida @ 1.65v. The last Elpida BBSE was RipjawsX series specifically the 2133C8 kit in 2011. Congrats. Most HYK0 1205 can do 2700+ @ 1.7v+. But what about yours? |
|
|
May 6 2013, 09:46 AM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 5 2013, 07:38 PM) Trident are mix of Elpida BBSE and PSC. i didnt know elpida went bankrupt. Elpida on TridentX is kinda impossible since they filed a bankruptcy in early 2012. TridentX is consisted of Samsung and Hynix. The slowest TridentX 2133C9 is also a Samsung. 2400 looks quite impossible for Elpida @ 1.65v. The last Elpida BBSE was RipjawsX series specifically the 2133C8 kit in 2011. Congrats. Most HYK0 1205 can do 2700+ @ 1.7v+. But what about yours? QUOTE(soulfly @ May 5 2013, 08:17 PM) i dont have a decent cpu at the moment, but my sandy bridge pentium can run the ram at 2133 10-11-10-30-1T at only 1.325v memtested and Pi 32MB but how is that even good. is this y all the new rams the timings so laxed compared to 2011. |
|
|
May 6 2013, 12:27 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ May 6 2013, 09:46 AM) i didnt know elpida went bankrupt. i only have pentium G620, testing for the highest speed at the lowest possible voltage...running 24/7.but how is that even good. is this y all the new rams the timings so laxed compared to 2011. not yet interested in timing This post has been edited by soulfly: May 6 2013, 12:28 PM |
|
|
May 6 2013, 04:48 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(soulfly @ May 6 2013, 12:27 PM) i only have pentium G620, testing for the highest speed at the lowest possible voltage...running 24/7. isnt there a need for balancenot yet interested in timing cause read latencies will be a issue. meaning in some cases a high speed ram with higher latencies will be actually slower on large block reads than a lower speed ram with tighter latencies. |
|
|
May 6 2013, 10:29 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ May 6 2013, 04:48 PM) isnt there a need for balance not a problem in my case because i don't run benchmarks or trying to compete with others (at least not at this point).cause read latencies will be a issue. meaning in some cases a high speed ram with higher latencies will be actually slower on large block reads than a lower speed ram with tighter latencies. i'm just using this pc for photoshop, lightroom, surfing those kind of things that i do daily. i could have stick to 1600mhz, but doing 2133 is just for fun because 'i can'... lol. |
|
|
May 7 2013, 12:57 AM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(soulfly @ May 6 2013, 10:29 PM) not a problem in my case because i don't run benchmarks or trying to compete with others (at least not at this point). not talking about bench. balance. in read of large blocks. afaik it will suffer with higher latency. hence y more frequent reads lower latency always fasteri'm just using this pc for photoshop, lightroom, surfing those kind of things that i do daily. i could have stick to 1600mhz, but doing 2133 is just for fun because 'i can'... lol. but hmm theory was true during the ddr2 and early ddr3 up to 2k but when 2k c7 and 2.3kc8 it got better so not sure about 2.8k-3k rams. |
| Change to: | 0.0200sec
0.51
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 06:14 PM |