QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jul 10 2012, 03:26 PM)
Interesting choice... cos one is a kucimiao point and shoot pretending to be something else (the Q) and the other is a high image quality but riddled with quirk camera thats targeted towards experienced shooters (the fuji.. and its waaay out of the 2-3K budget wor)
I think you meant a fast burst speed.
Having said that, any camera shooting over glass especially one from the dirty bus window also will suffer.
You're using that to shoot out of a tour bus? for travel?
I read some review of pentax-q and fujifilm x100, yea they're very different in both performance and usage
I learned photography back then using fully manual but that's long long time ago :/
and kind of lost with information ever since i start working and have no time for hobby (bear with me for my only digital camera is a panasonic lumix compact camera bought in 2002)
recently playing around with some old junk from my relative (canon S2) and start to pick up from there again
I have to say i would go for X100 (X-10 is a downgrade version although it is a newer model?) but the only concern is the things mentioned in most review, slow start up and the viewfinder can be dodgy at some point.
Is those issue a major issue?
Is it worth spending 3500-3800 (price that i research from various shop in klang valley) for this camera??
and any recommended shop offering reasonable price in klang valley area?
Again i'm not going all DSLR, just a street camera with better performance and need not interchangeable lens at the mean time (might invest in a dslr if i really really into photography again)
Comment are appreciated, thanks!
Also if there's anything better than X100 do let me know and i will do some research and compare it again.
This post has been edited by TheEvilMan: Jul 18 2012, 08:58 PM