anyone going to the bmw malaysian open?
http://www.bmwmalaysianopen.com/
i should be there from 12pm onwards tmr.
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.14, Nikon D4 $6000 only
|
|
 Feb 26 2012, 09:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
 
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Feb 27 2012, 09:30 AM) you will be by yourself? yup. |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 05:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Feb 27 2012, 11:42 AM) Nice! Haha too bad I just got back from Sarawak and Gota work later today today damn hot, kena minor sunburnt again...zzz. Maybe I'll go or te Wednesday session Added on February 27, 2012, 11:43 am Nice! Haha too bad I just got back from Sarawak and Gota work later today Maybe I'll go or te Wednesday session then 4pm rain like mad. anyway, spam a few pics of current world no.138 erika sema.   then i got bored and started messing with multiple exposure in body.  This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 27 2012, 05:40 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
my 17-55 also can use 1 finger to turn, but its definitely not loose.
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 10:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 27 2012, 10:36 PM) Come to talk about these loose and tight, a few commented that my 17-55 zoom ring is tight and asking if I dropped the lens before which I didn't. The focus ring is loose and as celciuz mentioned can be easily turned with one finger, however the zoom ring will require some strength to get turned. Is that normal for zoom ring? if its not level then will definitely feel tight, cos of the weight of all the glass. |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 11:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 27 2012, 10:58 PM) What do you mean by if it's not level then will definitely feel tight? Do you feel your zoom ring is tight or loose? Tight as in can't easily move with a single finger. means when its pointing up or down...i already mentioned mine 3 posts before u just now... but anyway, both my focus and zoom ring is tight but can still be turned with 1 finger. the zoom ring is just slightly tighter than focus cos has to move all the glass...but nevertheless...1 finger no problem. This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 27 2012, 11:09 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2012, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Sania Mirza returning service...she lost today...zzz.
 |
|
|
Feb 28 2012, 11:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
not exactly a good pic, but shows what the TC 2.0e III can do.
can see the fur from the tennis ball in the air at full 400mm wide open, unedited cept for resizing. if put thru sharpening then sure can see even clearer. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 28 2012, 11:22 PM |
|
|
Feb 29 2012, 10:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
today the bigboys come out to play at the tennis open...
saw a 300mm f/2.8, 400mm f/2.8, 200-400 f/4... |
|
|
Feb 29 2012, 10:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Feb 29 2012, 10:14 PM) Woah are you there everyday? Do you cover sport events for a living?? It's a pretty cool Job! i go there for fun.this japanese / french mix player, yurika sema, got eliminated today...her younger sister also got eliminated...so will be abit boring from tmr onwards...   |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 03:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
spam one pic from today...need to get better angles
world no.5 and top seed Agnieszka Randwanska moving in on a short return.  hmm...photobucket really compress alot...and i dont like flickr...zzz. This post has been edited by Everdying: Mar 1 2012, 03:22 AM |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Mar 1 2012, 04:14 AM) yeah pb compress quite a lot. i dont like the flickr interface, find it not so user-friendly and feels slower abit.why no like flickr ? it is good well the free account allow you to manage latest-200 uploads only haha so i went for the pro version |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2012, 01:24 PM) noob pork chop shot the pic looks slightly blur.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « should i lower aperture from f/2.8 to f/4 for sharper shot? duno...my camera already show "LO" in shutter speed there even i use max iso 1600, f/2.8 liao.... so u lower aperture, then more of the image will look blur. IIRC LO can mean exposure not enough, or shutter speed too slow so may get blur. in ur case, its a combination of both...+2/3 ev should also look nicer. anyway, why never use bounce flash? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Mar 1 2012, 03:34 PM) You mean DOF on DX is thinner than FX? Shouldn't that be the other way around? if both object at the same distance.In anyway, there are much more than just angle and camera setting for food photography. How the light setup to be is the more specific. If it's just take a photo on-the-go, that's more depends on how the photographer wanted to "express" as it is  DOF on DX is thinner. but when u frame the object so both looks the same in the viewfinder. ie. u move closer with FX, then the DOF on FX become thinner cos closer to object. |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2012, 03:53 PM) i think my camera already + 2/3ev already (or maybe +1/3 ev only ...forget) u take out 24-70 already ppl sure look at u.use flash i paiseh... dun like people look at me shooting something, i like ninja shoot  that's why i never bother use flash  <-- budak ini memang pandai cari excuse. so just use flash only la |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 06:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
looks like a mild attempt at HDR.
why never use flash? |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
getting bored...
defending champion Jelena Dokic launching into a serve, unfortunately she got knocked out today...there goes all my interest in the malaysian open  |
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 07:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
i'm a no flash guy, but still i own 3 flashes
|
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 07:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thats about good enough, but non vc 1.2k? i thought should be cheaper now?
|
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 08:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(amduser @ Mar 1 2012, 07:56 PM) this is why we see a lot of picture with the subject having shinny hair and shinny face, flashbang in the face~ no la.if slow lens like 55-300mm f4.5-5.6 maybe need flash, but for 34mm 1.8 i'll just shot at wide open and adjust distance with my legs "quantity of light" vs "quality of light". basically, sometimes u may have lots of light, but the quality is not there. maybe u want a catchlight, maybe u dont want all the light coming from one side or behind until u cannot see the person's face when u shoot etc. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0461sec
 0.54
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 12:52 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.