Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread V13 !, Le D4 is awaiting you @ 6000 bucks only
|
|
 Jan 10 2012, 10:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi  
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 10 2012, 10:03 AM) The thermal cut thingy is Nikon's best selling point of SB910... if update SB900 then how to sell SB910? hahaha sell to some noobies? i believe they will just the matter of time when  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2012, 11:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
never bother check firmware since i first bought it. bought when it was several week after launch which i forgot when
|
|
|
Jan 10 2012, 10:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
seriously i lost in ur conversation of TL BL TTL at whatsoever.
Added on January 10, 2012, 11:01 pmjust realize what my mistake on last last editing... explain why the halo came out after study this photo haha  Sibling 33 by IsePunye, on Flickr This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jan 10 2012, 11:01 PM |
|
|
Jan 11 2012, 01:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2012, 01:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
just realize my camera low ISO kinda noise. did any1 experience this too?
|
|
|
Jan 12 2012, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 12 2012, 08:19 AM) Lo1.0? ISO200 should perform better than Lo1.0 as Lo1.0 is expanded range and not the actual working range of the sensor. never use L. lowest i go 200 but still i found the noise is worst. some detailed are lossed too compare to CCD sensor and 60D. however when high ISO its acceptable... >< dangAdded on January 12, 2012, 11:48 am QUOTE(gerald7 @ Jan 12 2012, 09:28 AM) From what I understand from my friend's Nikon sensors 'degrade' over time. Even at ISO's where previously no noise, slowly more will appear. Its an unproven theory. Maybe he jst wanna find excuse to upgrade. Prior to meeting my friend in Penang I also kind of notice like how come normally at 800 ISO quite low noise previously, but lately seems like more. But, to me, its still acceptable.hmm i also compare with D80 which is even older than mine. >< just my shutter count exceed 100k and he not even touch 50kAdded on January 12, 2012, 11:55 am QUOTE(ojtee @ Jan 12 2012, 06:52 AM) did you try taking pics with different lenses at diferent ISO?, could it be dead pixels that you are seeing instead of noise? tried on this lens[ 50mm F1.8D 116 1750 VC 1870 80200 pushpull 200mm F5.6 takumar 50mm F1.4 nippon kogaku 35mm F2.8 AiS 55mm F2.8 Micro Ais 150500mm F4.5-6.3 50/2 T* 2870 tokina i quite dissapointed on low ISO which 200 - 640 seem worst among my frens >< quick compare with D80, D300s, D3, 60D, 5dmk2 40d 7d K200d a700. or i my eyes wrong ed? i dont think super high body also will be visible different for low ISO pixel dead? how come pixel dead if im looking at the same monitor? or it just my eyes dat dat >< i just wondering when i saw my recent photo noise quite visible eventho at 640 which i dont think i see it b4 Added on January 12, 2012, 11:56 am QUOTE(ifer @ Jan 12 2012, 08:35 AM) underexposed?  This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jan 12 2012, 11:56 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2012, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(ifer @ Jan 12 2012, 01:41 PM) your photographs will be 'noisy' when you underexpose it... no matter at which ISO setting yeah bro thanks. know this thing 3 years ago. thanks for reminder againAdded on January 12, 2012, 2:42 pm QUOTE(b0r1nG @ Jan 12 2012, 01:47 PM) also your ISO noise is depending on your picture control settings yes i know vivid setting tend to be more noisier in all setting. notice that 3years agoThis post has been edited by Isepunye: Jan 12 2012, 02:42 PM |
|
|
Jan 12 2012, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 12 2012, 03:28 PM) Maybe I'll try to shoot a few shoots when I'm home not saying it was better when brand new. i just realize that. and found out CCD low ISO detail slight better >< Yesterday only shoot some family shots, awesome! Maybe I should just keep this lens instead So you're saying that ISO200 now is noisier than ISO200 when the camera is brand new?  |
|
|
Jan 13 2012, 10:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(ifer @ Jan 12 2012, 10:40 PM) want to tell you about how dynamic range works in digital camera and how it's different from films. ok bro notedhow the 'correct exposure according to the light meter in your camera' might result in 'under expose'. but i guess you have probably known it 3 years ago already... This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jan 13 2012, 10:33 AM |
|
|
Jan 14 2012, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
Jan 16 2012, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2012, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2012, 04:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2012, 02:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2012, 12:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Jan 19 2012, 10:27 AM) like the background haha...dreamy colour... studio shoot with black backdropthe flakes and the "coloured dust"(?) is PS put there ?  background was 6 stock photo blend togather lol haha thanks |
|
|
Jan 19 2012, 02:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Jan 19 2012, 12:46 PM) Sorry quick Q, what is the current new street price of AFS 105mm 2.8 VR? RM4K apprxAnyone got anyone wanna sell their copy second hand, please pm me ya. Anyway, i ask again here, Anyone joining the Nikon gathering this coming Feb 2012? |
|
|
Jan 19 2012, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
QUOTE(latias93 @ Jan 19 2012, 02:18 PM) What lens are you guys using as your 'everyday' lens? I've been using a 18-200mm VR for about three years. 116 and sb600 in my backpack |
|
|
Jan 20 2012, 01:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2012, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
wrongly bought 6M sien! this bag too small la
|
|
|
Jan 21 2012, 04:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi
|
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0660sec
 0.79
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:00 PM |
Quote
