If the plan is from 10% of wages, like reduction in EPF, the main group being "crushed" may come from middle to low income people only.
Wealthy one may not being affected at all.
Unless it is done through tax system, if not, wealthy one may a lot of way not to pay a single cent contribution to the 1care.
As we don't know how the plan will be carried out, so I don't want to jump into any conclusion.
But for simple illustration.
For eg. a millionaire that work as shareholder/CEO of the company, he may choose to earn RM1 from the company as annual wages.
So if 1 care is done through 10% from the wages, he just paid RM0.10 pa.
While company make millions of profit and company declare millions of dividend which eventually the millionaire get million income from dividend.
So if like that, the wealthy, high income earners may not affected, unless it is done through tax system.
If it is done through tax system, then it is considered another form additional tax hike already, which can kill the competitiveness of trying to encourage FDI.
Reduction from wages is a big flaw to start with.
The system should be trying to seek for the wealthy to pay more and less wealthy to pay less to have a equilibrium for social welfare.
If the middle class being crushed hard due to 10%, the likely outcome can be middle class demanded payrise from employers or being bounded by employers, by then employers being forced to raise the goods prices, eventually, inflation around.
With inflation around, properties price has even firm footing than before.More simple way of thinking is: more money spent on healthcare means less money spent on properties.