Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
BF3 PC Hardware performance comparison., post your harware, settings and results!
|
TSjkmak
|
Nov 5 2011, 10:59 AM, updated 15y ago
|
New Member
|
Hi, I thought this might be informative for those still tweaking their graphics performance or for those who is planing on upgrading their system. REAL WORLD APPLICATION ONLY! no graph nor statistical bs. feel free to also post resources here to improve performance. TIPS: in the game, press ` (next to numeric 1) to activate console. Use the command Render.DrawFps 1 to show current frames per sec)
Windows 7 64 bit Intel i7 860 @ 2.80GHz (stock fans) 4 GB RAM Cheap Western Digital harddisk Sapphire HD5770 1GB Vapor-X (mild oc to 920Mhz @ 1300Mhz using stock fans) AMD Catalyst™ 11.10 Version 3 Preview Driver Average FPS on 64 player servers: 48fpsResolution: 1440x900Texture: HIGHShadow: HIGHEffects: HIGHMesh: HIGHTerrain: HIGHTerrain Decor: HIGHAntialiasing Deffered: OFFAntialiasing Post: HIGHMotion Blur: OFF (less distraction during intense battle) Anisotropic: 16xAmbien Occlusion: HBAOhere's a semi-official guide from AMD for ATI graphics card http://blogs.amd.com/play/2011/10/31/your-...-battlefield-3/
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSsoundsyst64
|
Nov 5 2011, 11:16 AM
|
|
Windows 7 64 bit SP1 Intel i7 2630QM 8GB RAM WD Scorpio Blue nVIDIA GTX460M, Driver version 285.63
Average FPS on 64 player servers: 80-100fps @ 1280x800 pixels Settings : ALL Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norazam
|
Nov 5 2011, 11:22 AM
|
|
Windows 7 64 bit Intel i7 2600k @ 5.0GHz (water cooling) 16 GB RAM (watercooling) Corsair Force 3 SSD Asus 6990 QuadFire (water cooling) AMD Catalyst™ 11.10 with CAP 4
Average FPS on 64 player servers: 150fps/120mhz
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Setting : Ultra
This post has been edited by Norazam: Nov 5 2011, 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
kintsuchi
|
Nov 5 2011, 11:22 AM
|
|
windows 7 64 Sp1 AMD 955BE 3.9Ghz (soon chg to 1100t) 8GB Corsair Dominator Seagate HDD XFX 6870+Sapphire 6870 toxic AMD Catalyst™ 11.10 Version official driver with battlefield cFX profile Average FPS on 64 player servers=45-60 range view set to 90 setting: Auto=Ultra
|
|
|
|
|
|
slickz
|
Nov 5 2011, 02:40 PM
|
|
Windows 7 64 bit Intel i5 @ 2.80GHz (stock fans) 10 GB RAM Kingston KVR PC1333 mechanical HDD 1TB Asus ENGTS 450 DirectCU (only intended to get this to run Starcraft II)
Resolution: 1680 X 1050 Texture: HIGH Shadow: HIGH Effects: HIGH Mesh: HIGH Terrain: HIGH Terrain Decor: HIGH Antialiasing Deffered: OFF Antialiasing Post: MEDIUM Motion Blur: ON Anisotropic: 4x Ambient Occlusion: HBAO
Average FPS on 64 player servers: 33-35 FPS, dips lowest at about +-29FPS on heavy scenes. Stable & smooth enough for me.
This is not autodetect settings, I pushed it higher until it gets noticeably laggy then I dropped it back down to somewhere comfortably smooth.
Going to autodetect settings at some high some medium gave me 45 FPS.
So yes, you don't need to spend so much to get a good enough rig. RM 440 for this performance at only 31% of the cost of a dual SLI Rig for 6870 or only 18% of the cost of a high end 6990.
This post has been edited by slickz: Nov 5 2011, 02:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
wilsonphua
|
Nov 5 2011, 02:58 PM
|
|
Intel Core i7 2630QM 2.0 - 2.9GHz Nvidia Geforce GT540M 2GB 4GB Ram
Average FPS on 64 players map: 30 - 50FPS
Settings: Resolution: 1366x768 Texture: Ultra Anisotropic:16X Others: LOW
i better go work and build a gaming desktop first, kthxbai
|
|
|
|
|
|
zero_hour
|
Nov 5 2011, 06:57 PM
|
|
i set graphic LOW ,....got 23fps
|
|
|
|
|
|
swhung
|
Nov 5 2011, 06:59 PM
|
|
AMD Phenom II X3 720 @Stock XFX HD 4850 512MB @Stock 4GB DDR3 500GB Samsung F3 Win7 Pro X64
All medium @ 1600x900 average 35 fps during multiplayer.
Single player is smoother, average 45 fps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSskater_noob922
|
Nov 5 2011, 07:59 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(wilsonphua @ Nov 5 2011, 02:58 PM) Intel Core i7 2630QM 2.0 - 2.9GHz Nvidia Geforce GT540M 2GB 4GB Ram Average FPS on 64 players map: 30 - 50FPS Settings: Resolution: 1366x768 Texture: Ultra Anisotropic:16X Others: LOW i better go work and build a gaming desktop first, kthxbai how do you think if i ran this game on the same spec except the proc is i5-2410m 2.3ghz and I lower the resolution to 1024?? can still get over 30 fps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
fazil0610
|
Nov 6 2011, 12:42 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Intel Core i5 760 2.8Ghz 4GB DDR3 Asus ENGTX460 Top 768mb Sea Barracuda 1TB Windows 7 32bit All low @ 1920x1080 super smooth in game.. wanna chg gpu but next year no moo-moo now
|
|
|
|
|
|
oec88
|
Nov 6 2011, 10:20 AM
|
|
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Intel i7 @ 3.40GHz with Cooler Master V6GT Team Elite Performance Series 8GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333MHz Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB HDD 2x LEADTEK GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB 384bit in SLI-mode
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Texture: LOW Shadow: LOW Effects: LOW Mesh: LOW Terrain: LOW Terrain Decor: LOW Antialiasing Deffered: 4x MSAA Antialiasing Post: High Motion Blur: OFF Anisotropic: 16x Ambient Occlusion: OFF
Average: 95fps - 125fps @ 120Hz monitor
The graphic in Battlefield 3 is seriously imbalance, the FPS can sometime go up and go down very quickly.
This post has been edited by oec88: Nov 6 2011, 11:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
wilsonphua
|
Nov 6 2011, 10:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(skater_noob922 @ Nov 5 2011, 07:59 PM) how do you think if i ran this game on the same spec except the proc is i5-2410m 2.3ghz and I lower the resolution to 1024?? can still get over 30 fps? if lower to 1024, can get more than 40fps
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrBlueBox
|
Nov 6 2011, 11:53 AM
|
|
Specs as in sig
Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Texture: ULTRA Shadow: ULTRA Effects: ULTRA Mesh: ULTRA Terrain: ULTRA Terrain Decor: ULTRA Antialiasing Deffered: OFF Antialiasing Post: OFF Motion Blur: 70 Anisotropic: 1x Ambient Occlusion: OFF
Average: 75fps - 200fps depending on scenery
|
|
|
|
|
|
oec88
|
Nov 6 2011, 12:13 PM
|
|
QUOTE(DrBlueBox @ Nov 6 2011, 11:53 AM) Specs as in sig Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Texture: ULTRA Shadow: ULTRA Effects: ULTRA Mesh: ULTRA Terrain: ULTRA Terrain Decor: ULTRA Antialiasing Deffered: OFF Antialiasing Post: OFF Motion Blur: 70 Anisotropic: 1x Ambient Occlusion: OFF Average: 75fps - 200fps depending on scenery Looks like my dual GTX 580 under perform compare to your dual GTX 570?
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrBlueBox
|
Nov 6 2011, 12:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(oec88 @ Nov 6 2011, 12:13 PM) Looks like my dual GTX 580 under perform compare to your dual GTX 570?  Lower resolution and I turned off MSAA which is an FPS killer in this game. So in a way it balances out. Also this game uses quite a lot of memory, so you might see an improvement with another 4GB in your rig This post has been edited by DrBlueBox: Nov 6 2011, 12:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
oec88
|
Nov 6 2011, 01:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(DrBlueBox @ Nov 6 2011, 12:16 PM) Lower resolution and I turned off MSAA which is an FPS killer in this game. So in a way it balances out. Also this game uses quite a lot of memory, so you might see an improvement with another 4GB in your rig But now I am very satisfied with my current setting, having average 100fps in 120Hz monitor, very smooth gameplay. If I set the resolution that is lower than 1920 x 1080, then I will lose the Full HD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrBlueBox
|
Nov 6 2011, 02:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(oec88 @ Nov 6 2011, 01:55 PM) But now I am very satisfied with my current setting, having average 100fps in 120Hz monitor, very smooth gameplay. If I set the resolution that is lower than 1920 x 1080, then I will lose the Full HD. Yeah. I mean i am running on a lower reso since that is my native reso so my vram usage is lower
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAViS
|
Nov 6 2011, 02:44 PM
|
|
AMD Opteron 180 3GB RAM Vista 32 bit ATI HD4870
All low, FPS 15 to 20.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nojo
|
Nov 7 2011, 03:49 AM
|
|
Windows 7 64 bit SP1 Intel i7 2600K @ 3.40GHz 8GB RAM Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB HDD GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB SLi Driver version 285.62
Average FPS on 64 player servers: 85fps - 150 fps @ 1920 x 1080 Settings : Ultra
|
|
|
|
|
|
oec88
|
Nov 7 2011, 05:56 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Nojo @ Nov 7 2011, 03:49 AM) Windows 7 64 bit SP1 Intel i7 2600K @ 3.40GHz 8GB RAM Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB HDD GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB SLi Driver version 285.62 Average FPS on 64 player servers: 85fps - 150 fps @ 1920 x 1080 Settings : Ultra Looks like both of us have the same specification in our rig.
|
|
|
|
|