Mine is mikrotik be only wired router connected to home gigabit switch. Whole house wired. Wifi using deco m9 first floor second floor. I can see that when fully 800mbps cpu increase to 40-70pct.

Normal home traffic. Youtube. Iptv 4 boxes, ps4, synology and stuff.

most reviews says 4011 > ccr ... 

ax3 is RM685. Bank vouchers will help with this.
https://s.lazada.com.my/s.5UAgb
A bit cheaper if buy direct.

Generally speaking I wouldn’t buy Mikrotik just for its WiFi. It’s always underperforming.

Mikrotik wifi always want stability rather then super performance speed.

Thx for all the help.

In the end, I reset configuration and start over, now it is working with the same method of configuration.

Probably there is error somewhere that is hard to identify

where else can we still find RB5009 ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQJ1DQle3zA

Well to those who love Cat6A

Tested ambient temperature -40°C to 70°C

At 53°C this thing already throttling. Lazy to talk to people that believe in spec. Best is test it out.

Disable keepalive setting and it should get MTU 1492 (hopefully!).  It should be this:
"ppp - do not send initial echo request if keepalive-timeout=disabled;"

I'm not upgrading yet.

And this is the history of why we're getting MTU 1480 (spoiler, Huawei): https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/pppoe-compatib...bras-nfv/182546

P.S. Hi @Anime4000, same username and picture here and Mikrotik forum.

Hi Sifu,
I'm newbie to Mikrotik, I've some questions to ask and seek for some advice:
1) what's the benefit to replace Mikrotik as main router to my existing Asus wireless router? Well, some too advanced setting I may don't know.
2) I plan to setup 2~3 PoE access point, should I continue use my Asus as main router (disable all WiFi) or use Mikrotik will be better?

I never use standalone router, so need some advice before setup 

If you have no problem with your Asus, changing to Mikrotik won't improve thing.
In fact a lot of SoC in consumer device make use of NAT / packet acceleration that only expensive Mikrotik implements.

Even then those get disabled the moment PPPoE is used in Mikrotik.

Unless you have a specific feature you want, I say save your money and just spend it on PoE + AP

Well Ubiquiti stuff is indeed user friendly. Not only their firewall, but their policy based routing is just point and click as well for major service provider.
The thing with Ubiquiti or TP-Link Omada is that once you deploy the controller, you kind of get sucked into their ecosystem as most of the features won't be available unless you owns everything from gateway to switch to AP. After you own all that, might as well own the camera and doorbell too.

The problem is you need to decide if your internet speed is going to break the 2gig barrier.
On one hand TM haven't roll out anything better than GPON. They might or might not do it when the next election comes.

On the other hand, if you do break the 2gig barrier, 10g is the next logical choice.
However, having 10gig port doesn't means it can actually route 10gig, or 10gig over PPPoE.
Like nobody knows if TM is sticking to PPPoE.

EDIT:
For the CAT 5e cable, they are good till 5gig. So I say just keep them and go straight to fiber for anything faster. From what I can see right now, WiFi 7 wont be breaking 5gig barrier.
Another thing right now is that multi-gig poe++ switch is still kind of rare and pricey. Sometimes I feel buying Asus router with SFP+ port and use them as AP is cheaper than a multi-gig poe++ switch + PoE AP.

If you value long term software update, nothing beats Mikrotik, Asus and Ubiquiti.

Avoid TP-Link at all cost. One model has multiple hardware revision. Not all hardware revision has the same software lifecycle. The worst part is you don't know what hardware revision you will be getting if you buy online. After all that, it is still a gamble how long you will actually get software update.

The 2-pack BT10 will end up cheaper than the equivalent Ubiquiti setup. You also don't have to deal with all the Ubiquiti bugs. Easier to setup too.