Add on schedule la..

i think u3 launch at fair price currently..based on current market and price for u2..they make fair adjustment..too exp no one buy...too low bad for u2 n low profit

i dont know..i only know that is standard and cannot ammend..tats why any freebies or rebate or promises from developer all will be on separate documents..
maybe you can tell me more since u sounds so pro

i already buy few..still dont understand..pls teach me..if cant then maybe u can keep quiet

maybe can buy kuchai east..mrt nearby..

if dont know sth have to be shame...then i can imagine how is ur personality
if dont know pls ask...dont pretend pro and give no answer

i already said is separate docs..which part is wrong..he said me talking nonsense..then i ask him to teach me..anything wrong?

The Difference between a Schedule and Annexure from a Technical Perspective
According to Black’s Law Dictionary:

an Appendix is “a supplementary document attached to the end of a writing.
an Annexure is “something that is attached, such as a document to a report”.
a Schedule is “a written list or inventory; esp., a statement that is attached to a document and that gives a detailed showing of the matters referred to in the document”.
From these defintions on a technical level:

a Schedule is not an integral part of the agreement as it “gives a detailed showing of the matters referred to in the document”.
an Appendix ‘supplements’ the agreement and is part of the agreement. It is an attachment that is invariably critical to the validity of the agreement.
an Annexure is a separate document from the agreement – a report.
On this understanding

if the attachment is critical to the validity of the agreement, the attachment should be referred to as an appendix.
if the attachment contains information that can be changed by a party to the agreement without effecting the validity of the agreement or without the need to vary an agreement, then the attachment should be referred to as an annexure.
The above explanation is on a technical level applied to the words used and their meanings.

From a Plain Language Perspective
However, for Andrew Weeks (one of our plain language gurus), one can (and should) look at this from a practical, plain language level. Common to an appendix, annexure or schedule is that they are all “attachments“. Therefore, you should refer to “Attachment 1” and not “Appendix 1” or “Annexure 1” and make it clear from the wording in the agreement whether they are intended to be an integral part of the agreement or not. One could also refer to a Schedule as a “list”.

The mere fact that an attachment was a self-standing document before the agreement was signed does not mean it necessarily always has that status in future, ie its legal significance can be ‘frozen’ at the moment the agreement is signed with it as an attachment (usually initialled). Changes to the original document (a copy of which was attached) then doesn’t usually change the agreement itself, unless this was clearly the intention.

tats why i said add on schedule..to be exact annexure..

if the attachment contains information that can be changed by a party to the agreement without effecting the validity of the agreement or without the need to vary an agreement, then the attachment should be referred to as an annexure...



This post has been edited by TokCoc: May 15 2019, 12:49 PM

No need to buy..no buy no lose

pls make urself clear before comment..9.5ft is clear ceiling height which mean the height u can measure after the unit completed..
i really speechless abt the way u comment..

just to inform u that osk will have black and white for the tiles, aluminium window, toileteries, door etc...building materials they provide
they will also setup a board in sales gallery to show all these material..
which mean show unit=real unit..i saw them remove the window handle from sales gallery to replace with the exact handle will be used in the unit

that is y i m telling u..pls dont make comment n judge if u r not clear abt soemthing..9.5ft is clear height..u get it?? u no need to be so pro go and calculate how thick is the slab or point to point measurement..u take ur measuring tape n measure in the unit and u can get 9.5ft..tats called clear height

showunit is not gold standard...building plan tell sales manager 9.5ft..sales manager tell me..maybe you can go n challenge every developer or architect

i agree retail lot is better than a mall in this market nowadays..one of the reason y cheras sentral fail is because of high rental..when the mall cant get enough traffic but the maintainance fee is there which make the rental high...the tenant cant survive..
retail lot or hybrid mall will make u3 easier to survive with lower rental and tod to pull more traffic..easier for tenant to survive/bring in tenant/profit..of course some brand they wont come in due to u3 is not a full fleshed mall..but who cares..u3 is to serve the nearby community..as long as enought fnb,mrdiy,daiso,bank..u3 can survive well

if earn then will share with me or not...dam..i must ask commission from dev d..
but i always think lower rental and enough traffic will make the retail easier to get ong..higher chance than a mall..no direct competition from cheras sentral, ekocheras,leisure mall or velocity..first thing the rental already different..second will be management..hope Atria can do it well..but Atria PJ not bad as a neighborhood mall..very packed at weekday night..parking full

someone use sunway nexis as reference..yes sunway nexis is not performing well..one of the main reason is sunway sell most of their retail and they cant manage it

Personally think car lift not suitable for high densitu project..high end low density yes..
Grand lobby yes..OSK should do better for customers who support them at current market..

E9 still hv 3 blocks to go..

Btw..First day of you city 3 booking is end of March or early April...So it's 2 months plus