QUOTE(RavemasterZ @ Nov 5 2011, 07:58 PM)
Well I'm looking to take photographs as a hobby,
I want a decent camera with DSLR quality, but i don't want a DSLR because it's too bulky.
So i think the EP3 would fit the bill?
The only problem i have is the cost, which i am able to afford just barely.
I'm told that if you really wanted to spend 3k on a camera,
you might as well get a DSLR. As for the same price the quality's better.
Is that true?
who : hobbyst
why : small size, cost, quality
where : not sure , event , people or landscape
what : not sure , event , people or landscape
how : buy from shop lols.
i can't really argue regarding the quality or so related, because in my opinion,
camera is one of the factor deciding the quality but the main factor is the photographer himself.
if u think, u will enjoy smaller camera system, then micro4/3 (ie Olympus e-p3) will suit u better.
because i have many frens,who bought DSLR and then just leave it inside the wardrobe.
Maybe they are not prepare to bring the large camera to everywhere.
i was once into DSLR too, almost all olympus DSLR i have used (e-410,e-420,e-520,e-1,e-3). just recently in a few month i move into mirrorless 4/3 (olympus e-p3)
first impression, almost all my picture blurred out, due to my instability using camera without viewfinder and also without high quality and fast lens such as Olympus 14-54mm f2.8-3.5
but after a few usages, i've accustomed myself and also got myself the Leica 25mm 1.4 which never leave my camera

truth to say, study urself first, and make sure are u ready to jump into BIG camera system or "small" camera system. if u are into small one, i will suggest, u buy the oly e-p3 and if possible add a good prime such panasonic 20mm f1.7 (low budget) or PL 25mm 1.4 (high budget)