QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Oct 22 2011, 11:04 AM)
tamron?? i seem it as pointless even budget is the concern. if you are saying back to the past, alpha user do not have much choice on walk around lens with 17-55 or 1650 range like in canon or nikon, i am agree to get copy of tamron. but now we do have new lens with latest tech. decent quality even in wide open, moisture sealed and most important cheapppppppperrr price.
Canon 1755mm f2.8 USM IS Rm3500
only (little expensive due to inbuild IS)
Sony 1650mm f2.8 SSM (Moisture sealed) RM2000 (but someone already offer at rm1850 in cari)
Nikon 1755mm f/2.8G IF-ED Rm4900
onlyTamron 1750mm f2.8 Non VC Rm1300? (i not sure, should be amost there)
you see the tamron is not dropping their price, the 1750 is getting old, out of perform by other. while i saw the different story for Voitlander 25mm f0.95 is drop their price like hell after panasonic introduce their leica 25mm f1.4 AF. It is really up to our own decision whether still want buy this copy. My take feel worthless. could rather save more few hundreds straight to get the Sony 1650 or get 2nd hand copy 18-55mm rm2xx to play 1st

Added on October 22, 2011, 11:07 ama77 price is alr dropped lo, from rm4299 --> rm3999 --> rm3899 --> rm3700 -->rm3600
I think you have not even touched the tamron before that's why you are making such pointless remarks about its performance. Won't blame you for that.

The only thing that interest me about the 1650 is the SSM engine. Otherwise spec wise tamron is almost on par. And it's lighter and has shorter MFD.
For that extra few hundred saved I could use it to buy extra batteries and maybe fund for a new flash gun.
But no, since you don't shoot events and stuff so you wouldn't realise the importance And have the need of other accessories as well. So I won blame you again for that.