Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Diecast Car Collector V8, We're getting better

views
     
aquilaTE
post Nov 23 2011, 08:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


blu3hamm3r: Wow... so many great looking hauls plus models too. I'm drooling all over tongue.gif- - - - -

I think it's this anime characters a little out of proportion body parts or otherwise, they look good smile.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 24 2011, 10:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 23 2011, 11:43 PM)
Hehe... finally... Nice. Do take more shots on it. Btw, do use Photobucket for ease of pic posting too smile.gif


Added on November 24, 2011, 10:56 am
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Nov 24 2011, 09:40 AM)
Reminds me that I bought this sometime back. Never got the chance to open and take it out.

user posted image

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Errr...  biggrin.gif
*
Wow that looks kinda wicked R8.

This post has been edited by aquilaTE: Nov 24 2011, 10:56 AM
aquilaTE
post Nov 24 2011, 12:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


myke: I'm new to it so I dun have a problem for now. For now, I'm trying to make a diorama to appreciate my available diecast wink.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 24 2011, 02:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Sauron76 @ Nov 24 2011, 01:57 PM)
One of the reason I'm more into 1:43 right now is 1:18 takes too much space. Also because of limited budget  sweat.gif
*
Anything below 1:18, I cannot appreciate the car details enough. Atm, space is not a problem since I have only about 4-6 diecasts of various sizes.
aquilaTE
post Nov 24 2011, 03:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Sauron76 @ Nov 24 2011, 02:51 PM)
Before involved in 1:43, I also think the same as you but once the poisonous Scott (subaru) bring me Autoart R34 Playstation, I said WTF! very beautiful laa.. whistling.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I think I'm a bit more fussy with details since I'm a graphics guy. But then again, maybe I'm not ready to go to the lower scale for diecast as opposed to miniature figurines wink.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 10:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


blu3hamm3r: Diecast is the latest hobby for me. Prior to this and still am collecting are soem of the anime characters made by Revoltech. Was into plastic hobby cars 10 years ago but got lazy and not worth investing further(knowing I botch the cars up), so I look to diecast wink.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 11:05 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


Wah! That puts me at the bottom of the food chain wink.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 11:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(hacken @ Nov 25 2011, 11:14 AM)
LOL....then? gidddy up man!!
*
Cannot lor... money tree so bare already tongue.gif

Anyway, I wonder any diecast company ever makes aftermarket or tuners diecast of the original car. An example like the Merc SLS AMG modified by Brabus?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by aquilaTE: Nov 25 2011, 11:37 AM
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 12:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


Just saw that too... planning to get that...
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 12:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


Wah! You so fast, Sauron. I'll probably do it next week the earliest.
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 01:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Sauron76 @ Nov 25 2011, 12:40 PM)
It's Chan la bro. Not me  whistling.gif
*
Sorry, type too fast and mistook the wrong name... hehe... me must be getting old tongue.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 03:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


blu3hamm3r: Since you mentioned camera lens, do you use any macro lens for taking close up of the diecast? I noticed your shots are pretty sharp.
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 03:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(blu3hamm3r @ Nov 25 2011, 03:11 PM)
aquilaTE: I used to have Tamron SP90, Nikon 105F2.8 but i sell it off long time ago. I just use 17-55 f2.8 to shoot all my diecast photo. Few photo also shoot with 50f1.4 with attached macro filter. The picture look sharp is bcos i use F18 15"second ISO100 with tripod. U might try it. ^^

Btw, just saw AA website upcoming model MERCEDES-BENZ 190 SL - WHITE. Goddam nice! Who is going to grab this??  rolleyes.gif

http://www.autoartmodels.com/web/product/e...09139160ED81A0C
*
Yeah... the 17-55 f2.8 is a good lens. I have a kit lens at 18-105 and my recent discast diorama shots I shot at F32 4secs 70mm ISO400 and a tripod too. I still find it not sharp enuff.
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 03:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 03:18 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


feel free to see my room pictures dated back in 2010 lol


Added on November 25, 2011, 3:23 pm

sometimes, youd rather not have a macro lens for controlled environment/"studio" (like having a lightbox) shoot as you'll get too many unwanted details smile.gif
*
Well, so far I have not been able to take sharp and perfect shots. I want to get it to the level the last time(I dunno who post)this guy shot the CCX very nice and crisp. The objective is to make it look like as if it's a real car in a real garage wink.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 03:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 03:27 PM)
click my siggy > scroll down > december 2010 dated punya room pics lol
*
Wow, you room looks way better than my college/uni days. Anyway, since I have a house, I've dedicated one room for those things wink.gif


Added on November 25, 2011, 3:48 pm
QUOTE(blu3hamm3r @ Nov 25 2011, 03:43 PM)
AquilaTE: Try dont use aperture higher than F20, lot of detail will start losing when u set above F16, this is become crop sensor and high temperature at long exposure on our DX sensor. Try it, I am sure u will get sharper picture.  smile.gif

The CXX picture tat u mean is it this one? user posted image
*
Okies. Will give it a try. I always thought the higher the F numbers, the sharper the image will get. Apart from heating up our sensor, will the image be affect from a hot sensor?

Yup, that's the one!

This post has been edited by aquilaTE: Nov 25 2011, 03:49 PM
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 04:24 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 04:13 PM)

Added on November 25, 2011, 4:16 pm

what blu3hamm3r said, and you dont even need DSLR, even PNS camera. use tripod will do, ISO 100-200 (depend on your psn/dslr, try not to go above 400 since you are in a controlled environment) it, make sure you got adequate lighting, and keep your fsop and shutter to what you need, not overboard it by f32 and 4 sec shutter  sweat.gif
*
Tried PNS many years back and it failed me epically tongue.gif

I always tot the rule of thumb was the opposite extreme will yield the best results. Anyway, I dun have proper lighting since I dun use a light box and I take straight out of the display cabinet. Anyway, will test later when got time again. wink.gif


Added on November 25, 2011, 4:32 pm
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 04:13 PM)
thanks. i kinda rather keep everything in my room, easier to manage/safeguard etc. and my collections consist of really f***ing fragile and limited (usually sold out on pre-orders itself, and never restock, only 1 time running/release)items, so definitely not something i wanna keep out of sight for prolonged periods lol

also, i believe the temp blu3hamm3r mentioned was the color temp, please dont heat up your sensor, you dont want a ruined dslr/pns lol
*
True... that's why I have a room dedicated for such things and not in the living room. My wifey dun approve to those things in the masterbedroom eventhough that is the safest place tongue.gif

The DSLR sensor has a failsafe at 5mins shutdown on the D90 since that function is made for video mode so I doubt it gets damage easily. I dont think colour temp is something to do with the temperature of the sensor. It's the colour ranges is what you called colour temp. But I'm not sure whether if different heat ranges on the sensor gives a different result to the sharpness of the photo.

This post has been edited by aquilaTE: Nov 25 2011, 04:32 PM
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 04:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 04:44 PM)
in comparison of a pns (again, controlled environment and/or lightboxes) and a dslr, dslr is MUCH EASIER than psn
why? much bigger sensor body is easier to take in light/image details

in laymen terms, for a pns, you're almost 100% needing tripod + long exposure periods, while dslr you just point and shoot (irony huh? lol) with standard 1/60 or even as low as 1/30 (IS tech these days tongue.gif)
*
Yeah, the one thing that ticks me off about pns is the noise control. I went thru two pns. They served me well till my demand got bigger... muahahaha...

I still needed the tripod to shoot even with dslr because of hand shake. Anyway, bridge cameras and pns have came a far way. Those two pns were like 4yrs and 6 yrs ago tongue.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 04:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 04:44 PM)

Added on November 25, 2011, 4:47 pm

i forever alone poorfag living with parents. so obviously the only place those thing should belong is my room tongue.gif

umm thats what im saying: photogs dont really heat up their sensors, they adjust color temps, not sensor temps lol.
*
I think you're still young. You'll own your own place one day. smile.gif

Well, I dun have to worry much with color temps since I shoot mainly in RAW. I'm just not there yet with photo sharpness... I want to trick people especially friends that they cannot tell the different between a real car and a diecast... so far, tricked only once with a crop shots wink.gif
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 04:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(blu3hamm3r @ Nov 25 2011, 04:50 PM)
Quazacolt: The temp tat i mean is sensor temperature. Long explosure will heat up ur sensor and of cos it will effected ur image. U might try to take  few shoot with 5 minute explosure and see. I bet the image come out will have redish or bluelish at the corner.

aquilaTE: Long explosure will heat up our sensor and heat can create havoc with photons and the sensor’s photosites. As the sensor works longer, such as with long exposures, constantly using live view, or during burst mode, it heats up and your shots will most likely include those tiny speckles you so want to avoid. smile.gif
*
Ok. Noted on that. Cheers. smile.gif

Btw, tiny speckles not those from noise?
aquilaTE
post Nov 25 2011, 05:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Nov 25 2011, 04:55 PM)
haha getting old lo, ady lotsa people call me uncle (mainly due to my appearance, as i look old  sweat.gif )
and atm not looking forward to a new place, planning for a car  icon_rolleyes.gif

well, you could try out those new tricks, hell, try some simple lowest fstop + 1/60 (just light up your shooting area well) and you'll be amaze at how far you can go. additionally, getting good flash (again, controlled environment means you can adjust flash bounce/diffusing well) is also a good investment in good photos.
*
Yeah... been there, done that... all the best wink.gif

Used to have a decent flash till it got fried.

Anyway, I'm planning to build a diorama that comes with lights as well so I can be like this dude here...

http://nicadraus-lambo.blogspot.com/2009/0...-118-scale.html

Of course, mine wouldn't be so bright like his since he's a commercial workshop and mine will be a private garage which will be so-so lit-ed.



7 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0580sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 01:54 AM