Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

144 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FORD Cars Discussion (Feel the Difference), All about Fiesta,Focus,Mondeo,Escape etc

views
     
Dias
post Sep 16 2011, 11:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
161 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Shah Alam

Today is the first official record taking of Shell 95 Fuelsave. Previous two records are now omitted from the statistics summary (due to being transition fuel mix).

CODE
Distance Traveled (km): 566.1 km
Fuel Consumed (Liter): 34.442 liters
Consumption Value (RM): RM 65.44
Distance per Liter (KM/Ltr): 16.436 km/ltr
Cost per Km (RM/KM): RM 0.116/km
Liter per 100 KM (Ltr/100 KM): 6.084 ltr/km


Was working extremely late the past two weeks (left office around 11pm - midnight for half of the duration and past 8pm for most of the rest). That gave me a lot of opportunity to coast on momentum (from 140 km/h freerolling till around 60km/h) since there are no vehicles behind me that I need to worry about.

Too bad it could not best two earlier records from Esso 95 of 16.527km/l and 16.777 km/l respectively. Maybe that is because I used the NKVE previously to go home while this time I used the LKSA and onto Hicom (was feeling stingy since it was RM 3.50 vs RM 1.10 in toll charges). There's also one instance of getting caught in the KESAS highway jam after getting off the LKSA.

I am looking forward to seeing how the FC will be like on normal driving conditions (i.e. no late night drives) but that has to wait till my workload eases (which is still far far away). Hopefully next week will be a better week and I'll be able to leave the office earlier.

As for fuel performance, the lack of power can definitely be felt on climbing mild gradients. Accelerating up a gentle slope takes a bit longer compared to Esso 95 and on leveled roads, it struggles to go faster once hitting past 110km/h (with the same foot pressure on the accelerator, the Esso 95 might have hit 140 km/h). The upside is that you tend to stick to lower speed and revs since 110km/h is around 2600 RPM (and maybe as a result, better FC). That said, it takes a lot of driving discipline to fight the urge press the pedal harder to hit the 140km/h that you are so used to.

Claims of Shell 95 being underpowered is a reasonable claim but whether it gives better FC versus other brands is something that will take months of record taking to find out.
azxel
post Sep 16 2011, 11:59 AM

moological mooster
Group Icon
VIP
3,421 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 2 30 N, 112 30 E
QUOTE(squareballs @ Sep 16 2011, 12:23 AM)
From Penang ..  biggrin.gif  What's the discount u get? The SA told me 11k discount for 2011 model.
*
Waaa... Great deal! Still got ka?
Bliz
post Sep 16 2011, 03:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(moon* @ Sep 15 2011, 11:09 PM)
yup
cant help to be poison after my 3rd test drive LOL.
thumbup.gif
jst collected tis evening smile.gif
will post some pix soon
*
Your antibody still strong, i placed my booking right after the 1st test drive, initially wanted to book 308THP already thumbup.gif
lmj123
post Sep 18 2011, 09:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
QUOTE(Dias @ Sep 16 2011, 11:40 AM)
Today is the first official record taking of Shell 95 Fuelsave. Previous two records are now omitted from the statistics summary (due to being transition fuel mix).

CODE
Distance Traveled (km): 566.1 km
Fuel Consumed (Liter): 34.442 liters
Consumption Value (RM): RM 65.44
Distance per Liter (KM/Ltr): 16.436 km/ltr
Cost per Km (RM/KM): RM 0.116/km
Liter per 100 KM (Ltr/100 KM): 6.084 ltr/km


Was working extremely late the past two weeks (left office around 11pm - midnight for half of the duration and past 8pm for most of the rest). That gave me a lot of opportunity to coast on momentum (from 140 km/h freerolling till around 60km/h) since there are no vehicles behind me that I need to worry about.

Too bad it could not best two earlier records from Esso 95 of 16.527km/l and 16.777 km/l respectively. Maybe that is because I used the NKVE previously to go home while this time I used the LKSA and onto Hicom (was feeling stingy since it was RM 3.50 vs RM 1.10 in toll charges). There's also one instance of getting caught in the KESAS highway jam after getting off the LKSA.

I am looking forward to seeing how the FC will be like on normal driving conditions (i.e. no late night drives) but that has to wait till my workload eases (which is still far far away). Hopefully next week will be a better week and I'll be able to leave the office earlier.

As for fuel performance, the lack of power can definitely be felt on climbing mild gradients. Accelerating up a gentle slope takes a bit longer compared to Esso 95 and on leveled roads, it struggles to go faster once hitting past 110km/h (with the same foot pressure on the accelerator, the Esso 95 might have hit 140 km/h). The upside is that you tend to stick to lower speed and revs since 110km/h is around 2600 RPM (and maybe as a result, better FC). That said, it takes a lot of driving discipline to fight the urge press the pedal harder to hit the 140km/h that you are so used to.

Claims of Shell 95 being underpowered is a reasonable claim but whether it gives better FC versus other brands is something that will take months of record taking to find out.
*
bro, how long had your fofi go so far, what i means is the total distance of ur car

Dias
post Sep 18 2011, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
161 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Shah Alam

11,958km total on the meter.
Eight_8
post Sep 18 2011, 10:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


ford focus model 2010 and 2011 got what deiffent? apart from the year made time.?

currently interested on ford focus but still think wether petrol or diesel type better ? any advise tongue.gif
gahpadu
post Sep 18 2011, 10:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(Eight_8 @ Sep 18 2011, 10:10 PM)
ford focus model 2010 and 2011 got what deiffent? apart from the year made time.?

currently interested on ford focus but still think wether petrol or diesel type better ? any advise tongue.gif
*
very minor facelift only...


diesel for sure....
Jim.tan
post Sep 18 2011, 10:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


QUOTE(Eight_8 @ Sep 18 2011, 10:10 PM)
ford focus model 2010 and 2011 got what deiffent? apart from the year made time.?

currently interested on ford focus but still think wether petrol or diesel type better ? any advise tongue.gif
*
Diesel is better wink.gif save money on the long run
Eight_8
post Sep 19 2011, 01:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


thanks for gahpadu and jimtan replies.

i tested focus tdci very power and good handling but i experincing there is a turbo lag feel, is this car build to mean like that?

put aside fc saving and turbocharge, petrol type is it more or less same performance and spec like tdci?
moon*
post Sep 19 2011, 09:43 AM

Do you have a Honda?
********
All Stars
11,927 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL / PJ



QUOTE(Eight_8 @ Sep 19 2011, 01:12 AM)
thanks for gahpadu and jimtan replies.

i tested focus tdci very power and good handling but i experincing there is a turbo lag feel, is this car build to mean like that?

put aside fc saving and turbocharge, petrol type is it more or less same performance and spec like tdci?
*
the car is heavy, it takes awhile b4 it gets moving.

but beside that, its
diesel > petrol in terms of FC.
diesel > petrol in terms of torque.
diesel < petrol in terms of HP.

but i think in city driving its the torque tats matters.

really suggest u for the diesel version smile.gif

i m a owner myself. jst pick it up last thursday.


Added on September 19, 2011, 9:57 amoh btw; any of u focus tdci drivers traded in their tires immediately after u got the new car??

what tires did u traded in to?? how much did they take in your tires and how much did u top up??



This post has been edited by moon*: Sep 19 2011, 09:57 AM
mycacha
post Sep 19 2011, 02:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
wana ask, if we order while color on fiesta got Rm500 discount?
gahpadu
post Sep 19 2011, 02:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(moon* @ Sep 19 2011, 09:43 AM)
the car is heavy,  it takes awhile b4 it gets moving.

but beside that, its
diesel > petrol in terms of FC.
diesel > petrol in terms of torque.
diesel < petrol in terms of HP.

but i think in city driving its the torque tats matters.

really suggest u for the diesel version smile.gif

i m a owner myself. jst pick it up last thursday.


Added on September 19, 2011, 9:57 amoh btw; any of u focus tdci drivers traded in their tires immediately after u got the new car??

what tires did u traded in to?? how much did they take in your tires and how much did u top up??
*
NCT trade in value rm150-200 ( depend on yr manufacture)

I straight changed my tires to N8k after collected my car
moon*
post Sep 19 2011, 03:02 PM

Do you have a Honda?
********
All Stars
11,927 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL / PJ



QUOTE(gahpadu @ Sep 19 2011, 02:49 PM)
NCT trade in value rm150-200 ( depend on yr manufacture)

I straight changed my tires to N8k after collected my car
*
n8k??

nexus 8000?

is tis the one??

http://forum.autoworld.com.my/index.php?showtopic=90870
gahpadu
post Sep 19 2011, 03:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(Eight_8 @ Sep 19 2011, 01:12 AM)
thanks for gahpadu and jimtan replies.

i tested focus tdci very power and good handling but i experincing there is a turbo lag feel, is this car build to mean like that?

put aside fc saving and turbocharge, petrol type is it more or less same performance and spec like tdci?
*
turbo lag is normal..sprint booster can help to overcome that matter.


petrol got better top speed but the important is how fast it can be achieve

diesel vs petrol
134hp vs 145hp
320Nm vs 185Nm

numbers dont lie..


Added on September 19, 2011, 3:04 pm
QUOTE(moon* @ Sep 19 2011, 03:02 PM)
yup Nexen 8000

This post has been edited by gahpadu: Sep 19 2011, 03:04 PM
moon*
post Sep 19 2011, 03:09 PM

Do you have a Honda?
********
All Stars
11,927 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL / PJ



QUOTE(gahpadu @ Sep 19 2011, 03:02 PM)
turbo lag is normal..sprint booster can help to overcome that matter.
petrol got better top speed but the important is how fast it can be achieve

diesel vs petrol
134hp vs 145hp
320Nm vs 185Nm

numbers dont lie..


Added on September 19, 2011, 3:04 pm

yup Nexen 8000
*
did u get urs from quicksave as well??

i heard there's a price increase in the tires. older stock was going about 278-288. new pricing is about 300-310 sweat.gif

u got a good contact?
Eight_8
post Sep 19 2011, 09:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


[quote=gahpadu,Sep 19 2011, 03:02 PM]
turbo lag is normal..sprint booster can help to overcome that matter.
petrol got better top speed but the important is how fast it can be achieve

diesel vs petrol
134hp vs 145hp
320Nm vs 185Nm

numbers dont lie..


Added on September 19, 2011, 3:04 pm


Installed sprint booster will be no more turbo lag? coz i feel that the lag some times will be dangerous and cause uncomfortable to the passenger.

those tcdi all already get used to the turbo lag?

going to test drive the petrol type...and soon will be in the league too either is diesel or petrol.......

Jim.tan
post Sep 19 2011, 10:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


QUOTE(mycacha @ Sep 19 2011, 02:03 PM)
wana ask, if we order while color on fiesta got Rm500 discount?
*
No such thing~ smile.gif Maybe cause they do have ready stock, so they willing to let go at a better price. This is marketing strategy smile.gif If only you're from KL sad.gif


Added on September 19, 2011, 10:21 pm
QUOTE(Eight_8 @ Sep 19 2011, 01:12 AM)
thanks for gahpadu and jimtan replies.

i tested focus tdci very power and good handling but i experincing there is a turbo lag feel, is this car build to mean like that?

put aside fc saving and turbocharge, petrol type is it more or less same performance and spec like tdci?
*
Well Imagine you are driving a normal car.. Ron 95 perform better or Ron97? smile.gif Then Imagine Diesel Vs Ron97.. i bet you can feel the difference.. Diesel TDCI main aim is to save cost in the long run not really a performance car smile.gif Good for City Drive

This post has been edited by Jim.tan: Sep 19 2011, 10:21 PM
kienu
post Sep 20 2011, 01:12 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
best price n package for Diesel TDCI?

i heard got SA giving 15k discount? am still looking for him/her
moon*
post Sep 20 2011, 09:41 AM

Do you have a Honda?
********
All Stars
11,927 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL / PJ



QUOTE(kienu @ Sep 20 2011, 01:12 AM)
best price n package for Diesel TDCI?

i heard got SA giving 15k discount? am still looking for him/her
*
ehh.. sedan yes. u can go to the federal highway showroom @ pj.

i think sedan u get more then tat isnt it??

2010 model about 22-25K; 2011 model lesser.<- sedan only
Jim.tan
post Sep 20 2011, 09:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


QUOTE(moon* @ Sep 20 2011, 09:41 AM)
ehh.. sedan yes. u can go to the federal highway showroom @ pj.

i think sedan u get more then tat isnt it??

2010 model about 22-25K; 2011 model lesser.<- sedan only
*
2010 Model all sold out smile.gif 2011 Model left come with around 7K Promotion

144 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0371sec    0.54    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:23 PM