Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !

views
     
nivlanauk
post Jul 26 2011, 06:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
307 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(ashland @ Jul 26 2011, 02:32 PM)
Thanks for the feedback. I might put 55-300 into consideration as well. Not sure bout the pricing difference atm. Yup u are correct tamron is more expensive than the nikon which make me wonder 3rd party lens could give better IQ? hurm...

Anybody have used/tried/experienced these 2 lenses or either one could share more experience?
*
I am using the 70-300 VR to shoot birds which is just sufficient for me considering my budget. sweat.gif
For samples of photos visit my blog below. (Not trying to promote my blog on purpose, just want to show some sample la laugh.gif )

Before I can comment on the lens. Please let us know WHY do you need a Telephoto?
nivlanauk
post Sep 3 2011, 02:23 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
307 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Sep 3 2011, 12:17 AM)
ya just make it simple, depends on your camera, if your camera is DX E.g. D90, D5100, D7000, then whatever lens u put up = focal length x 1.5

But if your camera is FX, then whatever lens u put up = focal length x 1, in another words, remain the same.

Things will get even more complicated when Nikon new Mirrorless or whatever it call with small sensor, which is 2.5x if my memory serve me right.
*
But if you're getting nikkor DX or a lens made for crop sensor, then the focal length stated IS the effective focal length.

This post has been edited by nivlanauk: Sep 3 2011, 02:23 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0294sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 04:58 PM