Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !

views
     
freddy manson
post Sep 13 2011, 11:59 AM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(darkavenger @ Sep 13 2011, 11:21 AM)
Hi,

I'm not satisfied with D90's AF — it's quite primitive when compared to D7000. I've tried shooting with the latter and the difference is big. Not only in AF but also colors, sharpness and dynamic range. Also, it records in 1080p with AF in video mode ;D
Yup, for video guys like darkavenger, then the 1080p is a good option..
For people that doesn't take video like me then no use also hahaha
freddy manson
post Sep 13 2011, 01:51 PM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



During my time using d300s never use the LV myself..
Last Raya ask my fren's brother shoot us then the 1st time use the LV

On my d90 I use it once or twice also..

Rarely find that time where I need to 'lay low on the floor' or shoot high angle..
If I need high angle or low on the ground; then why use my d300s/d90? My Sony a350 have a tilt screen that serves that purposes..
Using LV while it's on the floor, means I have to bend down more (already squatting?) Rite? Thus, the tilt screen comes in handy..

But if I wana shoot fast; will never use LV also. Just point blindly and shoot.mostly because of luck, 90% can get the angle that I want; or I'll just crop during PP later..

Cheers!
freddy manson
post Sep 14 2011, 11:26 AM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 14 2011, 03:09 AM)
If buy the D700 now, is it good enough for another 2 years? Used the D90 for a year, I feel like I need an upgrade already sweat.gif
*
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Sep 14 2011, 10:27 AM)
People can use 1dmark two for few years,more than d700 until now. Yet they still shoot good picture  smile.gif
*
using d90 for a year u need upgrade;
after using d700 for 6 month sure u want to use d3s mah..
then after u ikat perut makan rumput, beli d3s then u still need upgrade?

upgrade the skills mah~
freddy manson
post Sep 16 2011, 12:22 PM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 16 2011, 09:21 AM)
True  nod.gif
Well, turns out the 105 VR is still the more versatile choice, only issue is longer focal length means lesser DOF? And also if handheld easier to handshake but there's VR to compensate. I'm not a macro shooter, I might be wrong though.
*
Somehow using the 105VR I have to dial down to f8/f10 to get a decent DOF..
That's why I rely on the R1C1 to illuminate the subject

40mm should be a good wide + portrait lens for Dx..

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0390sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:04 AM