Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !
|
geekster129
|
 Sep 13 2011, 01:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 13 2011, 01:21 PM) okay, boss how about when you put your DSLR on floor? low until cant lying on floor that one.... XD then had to rely on Live view right? or when not enough tall, you had to rely on Live view also right?  that's why i ask that XDDD OT: what the heck with the nymph, i wan azunyan. I would use NEX camera just for that kind of shots.  |
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Sep 14 2011, 12:52 PM
|
|
|
Did I hear night bokeh?  |
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Sep 14 2011, 09:36 PM
|
|
|
.
This post has been edited by geekster129: Sep 14 2011, 09:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Sep 21 2011, 12:43 PM
|
|
|
Was wondering what will be the sensor size of this guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Sep 21 2011, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(0300078 @ Sep 21 2011, 12:45 PM) 2.7 crop factor based on the below engadget first hand info. http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/nikon-u...p-cmos-2-7-inc/Need a 18mm lens just to reach 50mm in 35mm film equivalent.. lol |
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Sep 21 2011, 01:05 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Sep 21 2011, 01:02 PM) Previous rumoured around the same size as high end compacts, e.g. Panasonic LX5. Anyway, DPReview mentioned the reason behind such small sensor... is not to disrupt DSLR sales/market? If such a small camera can be as good as a DSLR, then DSLR already need to be so high performance like medium format camera, e.g. Hasselblad ... |
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Sep 21 2011, 02:59 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Sep 21 2011, 02:45 PM) Agreed. An expensive Coolpix. Indeed. 300mm f/4 mounted would give 810mm f/4 equivalent !  Great for birding. I think if mount a puny body to a 300mm, the lens itself already much bigger than the body, can act like a lens cover too... so imba! |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0447sec
0.33
7 queries
GZIP Disabled