Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2011 Kia Optima, when will launch in Malaysia?

views
     
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 11:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(gregy @ Dec 29 2011, 10:52 AM)
Don't be so naive. Everything is made in China these days. Apple, LG, HTC etc. Electronics today aren't made to last. A Merc today is no longer as tough and durable as it used to be 30 yrs ago. Same with Jap cars.

The way you put it is as if you've owned a few Korean cars in the past and they've all let you down. I don't know where you live, but around my neighbourhood plenty of Getz, Aveo, Spectra, Matrix etc are still running around. Their mechanical engineering back then may not be good, but many ppl have said that those cars, even though with mechanical issues, are rock solid in terms of suspension and bodywork.

Are you driving a Kia to judge that Naza "has plenty of rooms for improvement."?

3yrs by today's standards is a fairly new car, but a new car it is not. And judging by the general population and how "well" they take care of their cars, 3yrs makes a car really old.

Why do you think a 10yo S-class is cheap? You need to thank our govt's archaic road tax policy. The smallest engine on an S-class is a 2.8-litre. That's RM1.6k for road tax. And by dirt cheap, you do know that it's still going for between RM75-88k right? Compare that to a same year Camry 2.0 or 2.2 going for about RM28-35k. It's still more than double the price.

How can you compare a 10yo Jap car against a 10yo Conti and call the latter "dull"?

If I could afford the FC, road tax and maintenance of a 10yo S-Class I'd buy one in a heartbeat! The reality is, someone wanting to own a 10yo S-Class is someone who can afford a brand new RM170k D-segment car with a 2.4 or smaller engine. So pls don't condemn that car, or an old Bimmer for that matter.
*
first, dont be so defensive/offensive, just sharing my point here, especially on WHY ppl are scare of korean product.

second, you should get a used S class, if you can afford the Air suspension at rm20k per set. S class brand new(recon) is more than 600k, so, 10 years later, its only 15%, yes, thats dirt cheap to me.

yea, i know everything is made in china. so?

Electronics arent made to last? so how about all those aircrafts and mainframes? biggrin.gif they have their design life, some are shorter, some are made to last longer. it depends on the design spec.

the concept of Jap car and COnti is different ( and korean being in the middle, trying to move towards conti side).

jap = in terms of R&D, they are more on development. Less on R. they go for continuous improvement.Hybrid, its only in small numbers and in selected models.

conti = More on Research side. they are more willing to take on new tech, and implement it across. Like DSG, and twincharger, suddenly in 1 generation, its available across all platforms.

pros and cons? well you know, Jap= durable and reliable( of course and boring). and Conti= very fancy and fun, but, needs more caring and love, and deeper pocket too.

People here and now are still used to the concept of longer lasting car.

do you need to be electrocuted before you are sure high voltage kills? now you know why human being can last for so many generations right? because ppl are cautious.

turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 11:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(wc5599 @ Dec 29 2011, 11:38 AM)
i don understand how u differentiate the R and the D here.. care 2 explain??
*
well, as usual, japanese cares more on Development, instead of Research. Not to say they do not research, but a bigger portion is on developing the existing technology, and perfect it, without reinvent the wheel.One step at a time.

look at fuel saving tech, or Horsepower tech. Honda being the most famous, they can have very good FC car, and also very high HP car, ( the B16 engine can get almost 100hp/1 liter engine displacement, this is near to ferrari territory).

and also, jap car maker is very slow in changing and making fast decision.

The ground breaking technology is seldom came from jap car maker. look at VW, at one moment they get all cars with diesel, then now with turbos, and then now twincharger, and then next they said twincharger will be abandon and go for 1 turbo is enough.And now almost all vw cars has DSG gearbox.

COnti car maker is very keen on introducing the new technology, but they never hold on to one for a very long time( not as long as jap car maker). Look at volvo at active safety technology, but, are their car good to hold on for more than 10 years.

To the consumer, conti car maker is good when you are loaded, and wanna shop for newest and fastest which gadget to impress your frens, imagine the HUD in bmw or pug 3008( not in any jap car that i heard of ).

But in msia, which a majority is still not making enough money, jap car is obviously the choice for the masses. Look at those old c70 honda that is everywhere. Of course not forgetting japan is nearer to msia, so the spare part is easier to obtain comparing with euro countries.

not to say jap or euro is good or bad, its always two side of a coin, and just pick the one you want.


turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 12:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SushiBurgerX @ Dec 29 2011, 11:56 AM)
10 years later, malaysia no more petrol....hybrid too expensive...and .i probably downgrade to bicycle then or naik bus...haha...


Added on December 29, 2011, 11:59 am
Nice Analysis. Yes, Japanese companies are slow to move...got pros and cons...for the car industry it's probably ok...but for electronics industry where fast paced are needed, onced giants like SONY are being slaughthered by Samsung now, being fast and reactive to the market.
*
spot on!

jap company are slow to make changes, thats why they cannot win F1.

look at honda? after they pull out, immediately brawn GP won F1(ok, not as simple) , lol. epic fail.
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 01:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 29 2011, 01:15 PM)
How do you gauge quality with a 2 yr old car? If your car starts developing problems within the first 2 yrs, then its crap but if it doesnt then it doesnt mean its all good either. Parts usually start giving way after about 4 years or so. Even previous gen Spectra's generally didnt have problems within the 1st 2 yrs.

And by testing handling and braking, how does that gauge quality? Thats a totally different aspect.

You wanna know the meaning of quality come test drive my 2003 Vios. Despite being 8.5 yrs, the engine is still smooth, accelaration still good, no rattles anywhere in the car, the window/door seals are still in excellent conditon, suspension is still smooth with no squeeks, aircon still really strong and paintwork still shiny and nice.

Thats what i call QUALITY.
*
rclxms.gif

thats toyota, and thats what they do best.

it might not be fun, it might not be fast, but you sure can sleep well in the night.
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 02:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(tunasandwich @ Dec 29 2011, 02:33 PM)
saw the real car today.... i must say... it's very impressive!!!

I was very tempted... but the price tag is a big let down... if only it were 10K cheaper....  cry.gif
*
ei, 10k, not a lot la.

u less frequent eat seafood or starbuck, or iphone, then you can get it already.

if u wanna buy 40k car, 10k is a lot.

if you wanna buy 140k, 10k is not a lot la.
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 02:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
tuna, second thought, since u wan it to be 10k cheaper

why not go for sonata 2.0 high spec? biggrin.gif

at rm13xk. the panaromic roof is.......speech less.
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 02:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(gregy @ Dec 29 2011, 02:48 PM)
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Dec 29 2011, 02:39 PM)

ei, 10k, not a lot la.

u less frequent eat seafood or starbuck, or iphone, then you can get it already.

if u wanna buy 40k car, 10k is a lot.

if you wanna buy 140k, 10k is not a lot la.
*


By that same token, 144k for this car vs 153k for Camry 2.0G even less difference smile.gif

Toyota woh... Where got fight?
*




yup, u just pointed out the problem of marketing this kia M5( really looks like BMW M5) .

and also, the prius is now rm139k. cheaper on the Fuel too.

looking at above choice, its good for buyer biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by turbocharged: Dec 29 2011, 02:50 PM
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 03:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(SushiBurgerX @ Dec 29 2011, 02:58 PM)
Err...my relative 4 or 5 years old VIOS...sucks shit...float like a butterfly..everything looks so "chan" and worn down...so how???
*
suspension kong, and user error, lol
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 04:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sochaiapk @ Dec 29 2011, 03:59 PM)
A car which is originally priced at 92k and now giving discount as much as 9k is not ordinary year end discount. We are talking about 10% of the original car price!!
This is quite a hot selling car looking at the volume sold every month since Jan'11 and there is no reason to give out such huge discount. I suspect there want to clear stock and ready for the imminent launch of another sedan model which is priced close to Inspira.
*
bro, the car since june/july already giving 5k + 3 years free service.

3 years free service also near to rm3000-4000 already.

i would say, they were too optimistic on the sales forecast. you know la.
turbocharged
post Dec 29 2011, 04:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(stargate8 @ Dec 29 2011, 04:53 PM)
isn't that the promotion for 1.8 model?
unrealistic sales forecasting.
*
discount across all models,

well you know, they scrw up 80% of the time.

when they dont scrw up the car design, they scrw up the forecast, lol.
turbocharged
post Jan 6 2012, 03:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(JuneSeptember @ Jan 6 2012, 03:39 PM)
Bro, i guess we can't use the last model to compare, it was alright, but not good enough to compete with T&H. But the current model is very tempting IMHO, and rather competitive in terms of design, gadgets and tech level so there's little reasons for NAZA to bow down. Unless, off course, T&H submits to pressure and start a price war (which is unlikely). Another good example is Forte, which never had any price discount and i reckon it is still selling pretty well.

Besides, based on the information that you've provided above, the depreciation seem reasonable, which is roughly 11% per annum.

I think I might go ahead. After all, i kinda need another car now, so i can't wait for the price to drop in 1-2years' time. Now i wonder if there are any good deals out there.
*
just go ahead.

wait for tomorrow?

what if tomorrow never comes?
turbocharged
post Jan 7 2012, 10:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(samquah @ Jan 7 2012, 09:29 AM)
touching this kind of cars can cry one

a 5 month forte 2.0 trade in by dealer is only rm60K ...

but seller wans rm90K

so funny

no value also
*
Cos he still owe bank 90k bcos interest included.
turbocharged
post Jan 7 2012, 09:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(IpohLad @ Jan 7 2012, 08:43 PM)
Only idiot like you would pay RM41k for a 8 yrs old sh*t old banger.
Very very old fashion thinking. Open your mind mate there's more than just Vios out there. Btw I'm a Toyota owner.
*
yes, better buy new myvi or saga. at least its brand new.

but, i think second hand car dealers also needs to be blamed on this.
turbocharged
post Jan 8 2012, 11:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(0300078 @ Jan 8 2012, 11:22 AM)
Most of the time if u plan to owned a car more than 5 year u can think less about the resale value.. Though this is not really applicable to Malaysian where majority loan taken are 7 to 9 years... So u want to get loan more than 5 years the resale value is quite important becoz sometimes this ppl tangan gatal after 5 years want change car n found out their car even after selling still owned the bank money n dun have money to paid for new car dp
*
if u pay 5 /7 years loan, u can change car around half of your loan tenure, when you have a good resale value car.

9 years, forget about it, anytime you sell you need to pay bank 1st.
turbocharged
post Jan 13 2012, 09:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jan 13 2012, 09:08 AM)
Yes. But i think they were like 'instructed' to say that to build up hype for the model. But Sonata made the mistake of pricing too close to Camry & Accord. Now Kia has done the same with the Optima. Not sure how sales will be like. But im hoping Naza throws in some goodies to sweeten the package.

Currently not much choice out there for that price range. Not sure how the new Camry will be like in terms of specs or pricing.
*
i think the only thing we can ever complain on new camry/accord is, exterior design, and not so good spec(gadget list).

the rest, they still have their advantage. camry and accord will never go wrong, be it now when you show to your neighbour, or 6 years later when you show to your second hand dealer. accord is still one of the best handling in its class, along with mazda 6(mondeo). smile.gif
turbocharged
post Jan 13 2012, 09:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jan 13 2012, 09:30 AM)
If you check my previous threads, you'll know that im an ardent Toyota fan having driven a Toyota for 8.5 years and loved the experience (and many ppl here know that). But the new models coming from the Koreans and the lack of effort from the Japanese has got me starting to incline towards the Koreans more & more. Im now considering a number of options: Peugeot 508, upcoming Toyota Camry, Audi A4, BMW 3 Series and the Kia Optima. Ive struck the 508 off the list after 4 test drives and alot of analysis. Now focusing on the other models. Not much news yet on the Camry but its design is a turnoff.

Ive visited the Kia showroom about 4 times since its launch and spent about 1hr there every time while reading up on the car. I must say after all that effort, im impressed with the Optima.

Yes im aware of all that talk about resale value, after sales service and durability/availability of parts and i agree. Those are concerns for me too. But i think, its a mindset change thats in motion here. Yes the Koreans gave us crap for many years but since the introduction of the Kia Forte, the Koreans have been churning out great models with great specs. So far nobody has been able to beat the Koreans in terms of having good design, great specs with affordable prices. After sales service is still a concern but then again, you cant expect to have everything perfect can you?

Resale value depends on demand and so far the Koreans have been getting demand. Although sales are not at the level of the Japs but its still much better than previous Korean models. The Forte's resale value has increased compared to older Korean models. The same with the Hyundai Sonata. And i only see that improving in time as more and more ppl start becoming conscious of the Korean revolution. 5-7 yrs down the line, im sure the Koreans will be enjoying a good following of loyal supporters the same as the Japanese.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
CM, if you love driving, go bmw. if you dont really really love driving, then go audi ( looks better than it drives biggrin.gif, Front wheel ). (resale value need not consider)

camry- safest and best for wallet ( cheapest if you include resale value) .
kia optima - looks like previous gen bmw M5 with tonnes of features.
turbocharged
post Jan 18 2012, 12:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
rear air con is a blessing for big cars and hot weather like us.


turbocharged
post Jan 18 2012, 02:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011


yup, . i dont even care if the car has no aircon biggrin.gif

but if i'm placing my money, i will wait for second batch.
turbocharged
post Jan 18 2012, 03:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(rcracer @ Jan 18 2012, 03:33 PM)
It's in the mind only lah, the air coming out is like an asthmatic only and already heated up passing under the hot body. The cabin of the is not so big like a limo the front blower even on low can reach probably the back windscreen also.

Resale if the vents are broken from kicking or scuffed, you try and sell and see. And i gurantee to replace those vents won't be cheap also.
*
sleep.gif

can kick and broken?

like that why buy rm140k car? buy vios lo, nothing to spoil also. empty car. all simple ancient stuff biggrin.gif

sunroof and auto light/wiper sensor all expensive also.
turbocharged
post Jan 19 2012, 09:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(stargate8 @ Jan 19 2012, 09:41 AM)
http://star-motoring.com/News/2012/Chevry-...kilometres.aspx

Chevry Malibu racks up 1.6 million test kilometres across globe

wow this is real testing, with the data collected, it is valuable asset to produce a better car
*
3-4 years ago, this is the car the chevy finally able to compete with camry and accord smile.gif

a camry beater and accord beater from chevy smile.gif

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0814sec    0.52    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:34 AM