ldt multi = 3 is way to go imo...
TCCD/TCC5 discussions, memory tuning, voltage, etc.
|
|
 Feb 21 2006, 02:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.  
|
try trc = 8, m.a = 8, r.p = 6
ldt multi = 3 is way to go imo... |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2006, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
from wat i know, TCCD runs hot even with low voltage @ high frequency...
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 11:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ Apr 26 2006, 03:08 PM) i cant even do this at DDR500 stable, with 2.5-3-3-7 @ 2.8V how bout ddr500 @ 2.5-4-3-7 w/ 2.6v?   my previous pair of tccd (gskill fc) like 2.6~2.65v only, highest stable clock done on nf3 ultra-d was 280MHz (mobo limitation).  This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Apr 28 2006, 11:36 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2006, 06:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ Apr 29 2006, 04:05 AM) 225MHz at very tight timing oso no problem... js tat high speed kena. this is d best i can give, other screenies gone as i've ledi changed to nf4. Ahh... thanx for the tips. Can u pls tell me yr RAM timing n drive strength? in nf3, there were only 2 options available, either weak or normal, unlike nf4. so u gotta find it out yaslf...   This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Apr 29 2006, 06:13 AM |
|
|
May 28 2006, 04:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(diablo69 @ May 24 2006, 10:33 AM) yeah sort of realized that.. so im looking for option to tighten the timing for my tccd... any idea... bro, some tccds aren't meant to run tight timin, i got a pair of gskill fc (rated 275MHz @ 2.5-4-4-8) when i was on nf3 ultra-d like u. d tighestest i can run 'em was 2.5-3-4-7 @ 250 ish MHz. y not try to run 'em on 1:1, since ya max htt is almost near to d capability of d board to run 1t, which is 280 for my previous board. n never try to run ya tccds w/ high voltage, i ran mine @ 2.6V (bios set) that time, perfectly stable... |
|
|
Jun 22 2006, 08:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
sumthing to share w/ u guys, i know d 2hours is nowhere near d ultimate stable state, will work hard on it to achive d goal....
This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Jun 22 2006, 08:24 PM Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2006, 10:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
just a short test... d ram is askin more & more juice to be feeded...
300 > 2.5V 305 > 2.5 + 0.03V 313 > 2.6+ 0.03V |
|
|
Jun 25 2006, 09:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(fantasy_kenny @ Jun 24 2006, 10:32 AM) well,the voltage so low..... 2.8v still considered fine, u ain't gonna run tccd w/ 3.0v & above for 24/7 like sumone...  my FF hit 300 must do 2.75~2.8v   |
|
|
Jun 16 2007, 09:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(leadaxer @ Jun 16 2007, 05:28 PM) Err...bump? tccd runs better in amd platform, some can hit over 300MHz on rather loose timin, still depends on luck of gettin good batch. u ain't need 3.2v for tccd, way too high. i would say 2.8~2.9v max.  try to use 865 tweaker to get d best outta ya ram. |
|
|
Jun 17 2007, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(leadaxer @ Jun 17 2007, 12:42 AM) Hmm, wut do u mean by 'runs better' in amd platform? Compatibility? Reliability? Performance? I would say that Intel-based CPUs are the ones that are lax when it comes to timings. Luck is, well of coz part of the matter too. coz k8 of amd are multiplier adjustable (downward thou... My enquiry is just that would it be stretching the limit, if the above-mentioned RAM would be to increase by a mere 10MHz? Thanx.  ), so if u got a good pair u can always lower down d multi & runs higher htt (or fsb for intel). p4 of intel are multiplier locked, so u cant go as high as 300MHz on fsb easily... for intel, iirc, higher clocks are always better, timin comes 2nd. This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Jun 17 2007, 09:36 AM |
|
|
Jun 17 2007, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(leadaxer @ Jun 17 2007, 03:34 PM) I believe i am misunderstood. Chill out dude, ppl here are just tryin to help, dun be misunderstood. Please do not compare to ur Core 2 Duo's, Quad Core's, AM64's and god-knows-what-else-used-by-NASA high end and latest PCs. Mine is an Intel P4 Northwood 2.4C HT running on an Intel i865PE chipset. I mentioned that the timings CAN be tight but doesn't HAVE to be. The voltages CAN go from ANYWHERE between 2.6V UP to 3.2V. (Meaning, 2.6v, 2.7v, 2.8v, 2.9v, 3.0v, 3.1v, 3.2v & anything in between). It doesn't HAVE to be 3.2V. And i don't need opinions on multipliers as mine is LOCKED without any option of changing it. I understand that most of u are new-gen of OCers utilizing dual-cores and 64bit procs, but mine is ol'skool northwood bred and my question is still, would it be able to withstand an increase of 5MHz from 275MHz standard, to achieve 280MHz without a hassle? YES/NO? No exact answer to ya question, all u can do is trial & error. It still depends on how far d ram can go. if u hit d ceiling say at 270MHz, it's really hard to push it further, even 5MHz more (i'm referrin to prime). Am runnin a pair of be-5, max prime stable is 240MHz, I've been playin with it months ledi but still no luck of gettin it to run @ 245MHz (my target). Be it adjustin d alpha timin, playin d d vidimm, changin slot position to be named fews...  So d conclusion is, be happy with wat u got after reachin d limit. |
|
|
Jun 17 2007, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
for intel platform i wud say hynix or bh-5 either one clicks well with it.
save d $ as tccd really not doin really well in d platform that ur in. |
|
|
Jun 17 2007, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jun 17 2007, 08:47 PM) As intel will oc on fsb and amd on ht, will the ram chipset make difference on both platform in term of performance when compare to clock to clock? i wud bet on amd win in this case, architecture wise amd is better when it comes to memory performance (in d case of p4 vs k8 of course). |
| Change to: |  0.0281sec
 0.28
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 05:08 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.