i heard it is quite soft <1.4 , someone please correct me if im wrong

DSC_0609 by fcuk90, on Flickr

usually what SS you all use for 35mm or 50mm prime ?
me using 1/80 sometime will blur, maybe last time rely to VR too much d .

Looks more vibrant compared to?
I use 1/80s or 1/100s on my 85mm.
I would put it this way... D3x / 1Dsmk3 -> D3s/D3/1Dmk4 -> D700/5Dmk2 -> D300s/7D -> D7000 -> D90/60D/D5100

Actually that D7000 and D90 a bit harder to classify.. D90 is more like advanced entry.. the D7000 more like a 'lite version' of the semi pros...

Better contrast compared to the f/1.8D? This one I not sure too haha... not much experience with the f/1.4D. Didn't like the lens cause I can't use it wide open >(
I bought it for RM600.

Last time I bought my 48L for like RM500 .

Yes and it's one of the common factor that causes you to get OOF shots

Some inexperienced model will move their body a tad when they pose without knowing this is bad for the photogs who just locked their focus.

if i focus on the subject's eye and then recompose the picture. the focus point will be different already?
I am asking this because, when i use my d7000 focus on any subject and then recompose it, my focus point will be at middle( I turned on "show focus point" from the menu of d7k). Btw, i am using centered weighted metering

i know about this. but i am not asking this.

when u press the preview button on the d7k. u can actually view your photo and display where is your focus point. but my problem is, the focus point on the photo always remain on the middle 

taken with noob lens 16-35

Before all these G and N lenses, people still make amazing and great photos. So, don't let the technology hold you back. It was suppose to help and make things easier and better, BUT not holding someone back or... how do I put it... too dependent and not learning... Just like nowadays there're many tools to ease many work, but it's meant to cut down and ease the work and achieve better result, not intended for people to neglect and ignore the skills.

Sincerely speaking, how many people can tell FROM Picture alone, what lens is used, what aperture, etc? If there is a photo taken with 50mm f/1.4G vs 50mm f/1.8D, can anyone actually differentiate and tell by merely looking at the picture alone?

minor PP? 

kaye kaye kaye~! aku masih stay kit lens je ni

any bag can fit ipad and dslr?

which 70-300 ?
the non G Rm3xx that one ? lol

---

Added on May 6, 2011, 9:25 am
oh the 1.2 very sharp and nice

The subject 'might' care (and I personally care if I shoot people), especially its a girl and she IF she has fair skin. Under will makes the skin darker or BBQ. I'm not saying its right or wrong, there's no right or wrong, as long as YOU like it or if you're shooting for your client, your client likes it.
If your're shooting for someone, you need to make sure your photo satsify them, most people want clear and correctly exposed or brighter photos. And some older people, doesn't know or care bokeh, you give them the picture, they tell you 'whats all this blur one???', bad photographer, change change! So, its all about preference and who the photo is meant for.

I'm just sharing my opinion and asking you is it under cause i feel the skin tones is dark, but I haven't seen the real person, so I don't know how she look like in real person? Is she that dark?

This is exactly my thinking when I was a newbie. 

I didn't bother much with exposure when shooting portraiture and always asking myself why me and my friends shooting the same thing but their subject looks better than mine!

Same subject, different exposure.

Some random pic taken from her FB,

My shot,