Totally out 

Like I said, if sometimes OOF sometimes sharp its most likely not back/front focus. Cause back/front focus is constant.

If it is random, most likely due to body or lens capability already.

no ajak me? 

If after calibrate still can't get sharp focus, wat for you pay to calibrate??? 
It's like you pay to repair your car, but came out with the same problem.... will u just live with it? 

kedekot la lu~! luckily i got my chance to shoot one of my dream talent on that day~!

ok what tammy? not that bad la. i just using 50mm f1.8 oni maa

thats why i hate buying third party lens
Nikon 50 1.4G not enuf meh ?

As the name implies, its micro adjustment, even if hiscamera body has the funcgtion, if the lens front/backfocus a lot, the 'micro'  adjustment up tp +20/-20 won't be of any help, plus, usually we want to fix the problem than using AF Fine Tune. If someone wish to sell in future, its better that its fixed.
It's off. And the picture is under? or did you PP and add contrast?
The previous picture of this girl, I think you add too much contrast? did you PP?

Booom is good, but it will affect the skin tones and noise/grain. 

actually, if given pictures taken by different nifty fifties, can you differentiate which pictures bokeh is taken with which nifty fifty?

Anyway, the pice can be a huge difference between the cheapest fifty and the most expensive fifty.

The subject 'might' care (and I personally care if I shoot people), especially its a girl and she IF she has fair skin. Under will makes the skin darker or BBQ. I'm not saying its right or wrong, there's no right or wrong, as long as YOU like it or if you're shooting for your client, your client likes it.
If your're shooting for someone, you need to make sure your photo satsify them, most people want clear and correctly exposed or brighter photos. And some older people, doesn't know or care bokeh, you give them the picture, they tell you 'whats all this blur one???', bad photographer, change change! So, its all about preference and who the photo is meant for.

I'm just sharing my opinion and asking you is it under cause i feel the skin tones is dark, but I haven't seen the real person, so I don't know how she look like in real person? Is she that dark?

Another reason I highlight on the skin tones is because the picture just before aldos, the picture is bright and skin tones looks great, but suddenly, you scroll down to the next post with picture, you see the big difference.
Again, no wrong or right and I didn't mentioned anything about wrong or right, my question was simply out of curiosity, 'is it under?', and also about contrast since I'm curious.

---

Added on May 6, 2011, 11:15 am

Nono, I'm not talking about you caring for bokeh when I give the example of elderly wanting clear, sharp photos. I'm just giving example that there is no right or wrong, it depends on the person the picture is meant for. If the person loves bokeh, then of course you try to give a good bokeh shot, but if the person likes clear sharp photos, then bokeh is useless. Don't misunderstand my post, try to get what I'm trying to convey tand share to you, I'm just trying to say I never say there is right or wrong, or rules in photography.

Whether you're testing or simply shoot, I'm not and I did NOT say you do wrong..... I was asking is it under? and asking is it you add contrast and share my opinion on adding too much contrast. I did not say you are wrong or right...... cool bro...

Oh ya, in D700 can I show all the AF Point in VF ?
Can't seem to find it on camera settings

they're suppose to be moving this month from d'sara perdana to iirc bandar utama.

how can u be patient on event like wedding? well i just be prepared instead of be patient.

lick it~

---

Added on May 6, 2011, 9:44 pmaldo ever wonder why i dont post unedited version normally??

bro aldo, here why i rarely post without any PP. sometimes just abit enuff ed. im no hardcore editor unless the picture require me to do so

im looking into my first prime here, any suggestion for the better start?
35mm f1/8
50mm f1/8
or
85mm f1/8?

their current price aren't that much different right?

I believe nobody said the tammy cannot be used, but it has its weakness, every lens has. I don't mind admitting a weakness, rather than cheating myself. just like the 3tmm f1.8, it's not a super lens, it has few  weakness, but for its price, its good, just like the tammy.
Also, like the 50mm f/1.8, for the price? it's a great lens.

As for the photo, nobody is saying how bad you are for shooting under, firstly, my post was asking a Question:
is it under?
I wonder if you qualify a question as saying you did a mistale or you did wrong. and I think you're over sensitive and carried away. even if you shoot under, there's nothing wrong, why get over sensitive about it, the way I see it, it's actually good that many people shared their views and discussion, people are not critisizing you in negative way, they're showing good informationa and sharing, I think its more important to appreciate and learn from it, unless you already know this. If not, I think it's important not to let ego be in the way of you for learning. Most people are not willing to admit and learn, which is the first step and hardest step to take.

But as I said, if you already know about the under expose and skin tones, t please ignore my post, but iI still think those information shared by others especially CY is very helpful and useful to anyonthat didn't know. And isepunye also shared a very good exmaple how adjusting the exposure and touchup can make a big difference. Personally, I appreciate their post and sharing.