QUOTE(celciuz @ May 26 2011, 09:15 AM)
VR and VR2 definitely sharper than the 80200 wide open

Depends on which type of 80-200mm f/2.8 you are talking about... On a crop DX sensor, perhaps that your statement is true.
But on FX, the order of sharpness wide open is as follows;
VR2 > AF-S 80-200mm f/2.8 > VR1
I would assume the AF-D version to be the least sharp.
QUOTE(0168257061 @ May 26 2011, 10:08 AM)
Hoping one day can hug the 70-200 VR home
Like this?

QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ May 26 2011, 10:16 AM)
I think it is too saturated? what do you think?

The photo is a little small but from what I can see, shadows are a little blocked i.e. details in the shadows are non-existent.
QUOTE(0168257061 @ May 26 2011, 12:44 PM)
and canon refreshed all their 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 big prime
as well as announcing 200-400 F4 with built-in 1.4x teleconverter switch

The 200-400 was long overdue. A lot of nature photographers switched to Nikon because at that time, the Canon had no equivalent. Andy Rouse switched from Canon to Nikon mostly because of the D3 but also because of the Nikon 200-400mm f/4.
Anyway, I believe Nikon just refreshed their 400mm, 500mm and 600mm big primes during the introduction of the D3 just in time for Beijing Olympics. Then after that, they updated the 300mm.
Anyway, I think one of the most awaited lenses to be updated with VR or AF-S motor is the 300mm f/4 and the 80-400mm zoom. Now if they can also update their 1.4x and 1.7x TCs like they did for their 2.0x TC, that would be wonderful too.