sigmalux OOF?

sigmalux in focus

---

Added on May 5, 2011, 5:54 pm
ya bro.. I think I need to calibrate it.
the problem is sometimes I shoot in 1/100s ++ still OOF. 
eh bro.. meaning my sigmalux is not compactible with my body? 

definitely not sigmalux .haha
last time bliz sigma very sharp wor. i saw kent's one also sharp .

but in higher end body like d300 and above , the body can correct the foccusing problem right ? iinm,

hmm i just noticed canon dslrs have no af assist beam.

All sifu,

So i bought a D5100 with kit lens, been reading alot of articles, magazine and books, although i started to see stuff differently, and understand a little bit more on the world of photography.

What's next?

Enroll  into Class offer at Nikon center?
Buy the new Nikon 50mm lens?
Buy a camera bag - Crumpler 5 million?
Buy a Flash Gun?
Buy a spare battery?
Buy a neck strap?
Buy a new camera body only.
Buy more lens?

Whats next, which 1 is priority? and what is recomended.

Million thanks in advance

waa.. my sigmalux confirm focusing problem
tested for shooting my friend cannot find the sharp one.

i think my body got a bit back focus problem...
as i adjusted in d AF Fix in D700...
i use +20...
slightly better compare to 0...
use d same setting for 85G & 1635 F4...
1635 is ok as DOF is quite long...
but but using 85G stil can't get focus on d spot...
slightly back abit...

for those who said 1750 vc said slow motor, not sharp enuff, i still earn using that lens till today. its been a year already

---

Added on May 6, 2011, 12:11 ammy target this image is catch eye~! did i make it?

Poisoned by the bokeh of 85 f1.4 day by day. The reason I bought the 80-200 f2.8 is for the bokeh, now I'm in doubt again

@ @

and canon user can use most of their lens with AF too, no need to worry to see AF-D ka AF-S ka,

^looks fine for me .

Sigmalux backfocus lo

thats why i hate buying third party lens
Nikon 50 1.4G not enuf meh ?

jz downloaded d focus chart...
will try wif d focus later...

can anyone tell me why 70-300 price so low?

and who cares about under. exposure is where you have to play. you don't have to get the correct exposure every time what?
for food I prefer over expose. why would you stick in the correct exposure?
I didn't pp this one 
try to give me and let me try.

The 1st sample always reminds me off ppl using olden days digital P&S + flash when they r still 5mp, lol....

huge difference. The tonality difference between the 2 photos give the viewer a totally different feel.

The first one made her face look so oily, but the second one feels more lively and her face looked like as if she has just came out from a facial session.

That's what DSLR owners should strive to achieve.

Simple.... that's y all models like CY to tag their photo la....

The first pic took by DSLR also ?

Btw... Bro celciuz... Calibrate lens & body is free if it's under warranty rite? Btw,way to bring if I'm going to send for service...?

what the 50mm price nowadays..last nov dec i can get rm350..

Love the contrast! Is it because of the lens or editing?

Care to share your guidance and secrets for proper exposure?

The one with CY and the one without CY has clear differences
If they shoot on auto, it might try to expose for the background as well, thus the subject may get underexpose. Spot metering will help to expose the subject but it may also overexpose. This all comes to the skill of the photographer and also whether you have the time to adjust the settings and try out.

Lastly, there maybe people with different preferences or point of view like, the highlights blown, or the white clothing blended with the background thingy. It's hard to get the perfect picture unless the camera has higher dynamic range or we do HDR? Anyway, for this scenario, personally, I would prefer the subject is properly expose like CYs photo.

So does my laptop.

No way as in tak mau share...

If their face look small, then should be OK, but close up and still under then i need to recover light with reflector liao... Eyes got some catchlight also look appealing too.