Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Need recommendation/advise for my caraudio system, pls use this thread in the future

views
     
izso
post Sep 2 2011, 06:48 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Or buy an amp that has RCA output. Old skool style!
izso
post Sep 2 2011, 11:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Or get a processor!
izso
post Sep 5 2011, 01:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(kirakun @ Sep 3 2011, 12:44 AM)
Alrite here goes again, I got 2 sub in mind atm which are used seas sw300 and new jl w3v3 which are priced roughly on par which each other but I can't make up my mind which to go for, any suggestion? Also to pair it with either used genesis dual mono or tru tech t2.1 or helix a2? Which amp suits better? Thanks a mill.
*
Seas is supposedly more musical. But JLW3v3 isn't a slouch either. I suspect the Seas can go lower. The JL should be an overall performer. If you can get the original JL then imho it's a better buy. But Seas is probably a more SQ sub.

I don't think the Helix A2 can power the JL properly. Is it 1 or 2ohm stable? If yes then ok otherwise it won't work.

All the 3 amps you suggested are pretty good. I don't think you'll really be able to hear the difference between the three if compared side by side.
izso
post Sep 5 2011, 09:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(kirakun @ Sep 5 2011, 02:21 PM)
Well thanks for the feedback, I'm getting the sub from mike so it should be original no doubts. Will be going for 4 ohm so power wise will be slacking a bit considering either tru t2.1 or genesis dual mono As the output will be 200w while the sub needs 250w rms. Helix a2 while is sufficient with 300w at 4 ohm. Also diamond d5 can be considered too as it is an amp for sub rite? Correct me if I'm wrong ya.
*
If it's Mike you're getting it from, then I suggest you ask Mike for the best combination for your application. He knows his stuff!

And you're right about the Helix, better to over power the sub than to underpower it. At least that way you'll have some headroom.
izso
post Sep 7 2011, 09:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Personally I'd go for the dual mono and the JLW3v3! HEhehe.. different people different tastes.
izso
post Sep 8 2011, 07:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
The dual mono is a underrated amp. It outputs way more than it claims. The Helix A2 is a safe bet too if you're not confident.
izso
post Sep 12 2011, 08:35 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(kirakun @ Sep 9 2011, 05:39 PM)
Dont have any to audit so it is really a hard decision to make. Either helix a2 or genesis dual mono. Have to go blind on this so any1 audited both before? Which is better in term of sounding and performance?
*
The Genesis Dual mono has plenty of character. Sound wise I think it's quite unique. Can't really explain it and with that sort of power it'll have no problems with almost any speaker.

The Helix A2 is also a monster of an amp, but it's very clinical, very german - plain and simple sounding. It's very detailed, but lacks character. I used this to drive my Dynaudio tweeters in the past and it was bloody fantastic. Worked really well with my Dynaudio Mids too. So it really depends on how you match the fella (A2).

Both amps are pretty good but the A2 is way larger in size (though the Genesis isn't that much smaller). Personally - since both amps are going to be used to drive a sub, I'd be pretty hard pressed to hear the musical difference between the two for a sub. Components is a different story.
izso
post Sep 14 2011, 07:27 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Tru Hammer H1!
izso
post Sep 19 2011, 08:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Actually I disagree to some extent too.

Passives can be tweaked quite a bit to change the characteristics of the speakers. A high end silver SQ cap, a Bybee quantum filter, batcap, mundorf resisters, etc all changes the characteristics of the sound.

So you probably can tweak your passives but a different kind of tweak. You don't fiddle with crossover points and all (even though you can) and instead fiddle with the quality of the frequency (?)
izso
post Sep 20 2011, 07:02 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Sep 19 2011, 01:54 PM)
So now i just extend the wire from the dashboard to door la?
*
Technically you should be pulling the wire from your HU / crossover to the door.
izso
post Sep 21 2011, 08:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(howiechoo @ Sep 20 2011, 11:46 PM)
wat difference if pull from existing wiring to door vs pull from hu with the same wire?
No mah.. he said "pull wire from dashboard to door". Technically that's not right. Dashboard not part of the ICE maaahh. rolleyes.gif

izso
post Sep 28 2011, 03:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(Xforged @ Sep 27 2011, 10:36 PM)
Bros, searching for an amp to power up my com and sub. stumble upon PHD 4075. how does the output sound produce? Is it warmer or on the bright side? Thinking of 2nd hand.
*
I know someone selling this amp at RM800 nego. TriC @ Chew from icehifi

http://www.icehifi.com/index.php/topic,3064.0.html

Good seller, great condition amp
izso
post Sep 28 2011, 03:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(Xforged @ Sep 28 2011, 03:12 PM)
thanks zennn, will be on the lookout for this. can run active on this amp? enough to power JL12W0?

i saw someone said that installing a separate amp i.e. mono or monoblock to fire subs can allow flexibility when upgrading. is this true?
*
The JL12W0 (I assume is v3) is SVC 4ohm 300w RMS.

The 4075 bridged is 4ohm 220w slightly underrated. It shouldn't be a problem powering this sub but you won't be maximizing the sub but doesn't really matter. So yes, it'll work.

Running the sub by itself rather than on a multichannel amp just stresses the amp less and those SQ audiophiles will claim that it 'sounds better'. I honestly can't tell the difference but no harm taxing the amp less.
izso
post Sep 29 2011, 08:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
xforged : Uh.. do I know you? How'd you know my name? Anyway I had a PHD 2200, not the 4075.


izso
post Oct 11 2011, 07:15 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(AlexLee277 @ Oct 10 2011, 09:02 PM)
hi guys, can recommend me some place around cheras/kl to shop for players? beside jalan pasar smile.gif
*
Cheras/KL I can only think of 2 shops : EA Autoworks and Etoni.
PJ I can think of more : CV Audio, Audio Creations and a few others I haven't had interaction with.
izso
post Oct 13 2011, 09:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Attach ground to the car body and see
izso
post Oct 22 2011, 12:33 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
9855 is the last of the last generation of Alpines which were known to be bright sounding. I personally like the 9855 over the 9887 which is a little more refined and you could say pioneer-ish. Both have their pros and cons. I personally choose the 9855.
izso
post Oct 26 2011, 09:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Recently changed my 9855 to this :

user posted image

and I'm in loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooove
izso
post Oct 27 2011, 07:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(taaron @ Oct 26 2011, 10:25 PM)
do u use other DSP to couple up with that lovely classic?
DSP? Not needed as it has 2 RCA out. The tube version of this player is a little too warm for my liking and this is brilliantly bright and crisp. Just nice for my type of music.

izso
post Oct 28 2011, 07:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(taaron @ Oct 27 2011, 09:53 PM)
erm..then means u only play 2 way passive front stage + sub, without any digital processing such as TA, EQ and etc rite? or u have ur own ext. eq/proc/e. x-over for tuning purpose?
*
Correct, no TA, no EQ etc. The crossover for my components is my custom passives, the sub goes through the amp. But sub and amp isn't mine so I'm not touching those.

And ignore Howie's RM100 comment. It's a private joke between the crazy bugger and me. doh.gif

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0468sec    1.00    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 08:17 PM