Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
211 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD, TIPS,Q n A, Results...Great For NueBis

views
     
nelza_ax
post Aug 12 2006, 08:20 PM

i am me
*****
Senior Member
889 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Malacca


QUOTE(startrail @ Aug 12 2006, 08:07 PM)
My old intel m/b can be overclock or not?
D845WN
still support SD rams ...
*
try to find the menu in ur bios blush.gif
RokXIII
post Aug 22 2006, 04:49 AM

C'est la vie, Chérie
******
Senior Member
1,634 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Ipoh @ Puchong


guys, can help somthg in this?

user posted image

i jus wan to kno, can i oc my ram?
the divider is 4:5 (actually i'm not understand what does it mean...)

now i dunno my ram is 2.5-3-3-8 or 2.5-4-4-8. rclxub.gif i got 3 sticks of ram, 256+512+256, all are corsair.


since the FSB is 167, the divider is 4:5, then 167*(4/5)=133.6, 133.6*2(since it is DDR), equals to 267.2, is that mean i gona change my DRAM frequency to DDR266?

correct me if i'm wrong!(i know i must be wrong)...

This post has been edited by RokXIII: Aug 23 2006, 02:06 AM
raymond5105
post Aug 30 2006, 03:41 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Aug 22 2006, 04:49 AM)
guys, can help somthg in this?

user posted image

i jus wan to kno, can i oc my ram?
the divider is 4:5 (actually i'm not understand what does it mean...)

now i dunno my ram is 2.5-3-3-8 or 2.5-4-4-8. rclxub.gif  i got 3 sticks of ram, 256+512+256, all are corsair.
since the FSB is 167, the divider is 4:5, then 167*(4/5)=133.6,  133.6*2(since it is DDR), equals to 267.2, is that mean i gona change my DRAM frequency to DDR266?

correct me if i'm wrong!(i know i must be wrong)...
*
The 4:5 means for 166FSB you set on the setting,quad 166 will the 668FSB on the CPU-Z. Where your memory you will get 208MHz from this equation (166*5/4).Get what i mean?
jasonlim
post Sep 1 2006, 08:38 AM

Bunga(R)
*******
Senior Member
3,575 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kelana Jaya,Selangor/Muar,Johor


QUOTE(Devilc0de @ Aug 10 2006, 03:30 PM)
testing my PD 805 oc to 3.65ghz yesterday.. pass 1 hours stress test on 2X sp2004.
idle temp 40c , load 54c  on stock HSF wink.gif
user posted image
*
wah!!ur temp on stock on HSF also so nice..impressive!!

mine on TT BT @ 3.4ghz also 36C nia lowest sweat.gif
RokXIII
post Sep 6 2006, 01:16 AM

C'est la vie, Chérie
******
Senior Member
1,634 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Ipoh @ Puchong


Still the RAM QUestion here...
Please c here

1)From the pic above, my RAM frequency 208.8, times 2 is 417 which is closer to 400 coz my RAM is DDR400. So can it be say i OC on a correct way for my RAM?

2)If i keep on OC my proc and make the fsb to 200, then the RAM frequency ll becom 250, times 2 ll becom 500. Since my RAM just DDR400, so if I make to 500, my mobo can support it? Performences ll better or weaker?

3)Can I change the divider 4:5 to other?

Thanks!

This post has been edited by RokXIII: Sep 6 2006, 01:18 AM
raymond5105
post Sep 6 2006, 05:27 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Sep 6 2006, 01:16 AM)
Still the RAM QUestion here...
Please c here

1)From the pic above, my RAM frequency 208.8, times 2 is 417 which is closer to 400 coz my RAM is DDR400. So can it be say i OC on a correct way for my RAM?

2)If i keep on OC my proc and make the fsb to 200, then the RAM frequency ll becom 250, times 2 ll becom 500. Since my RAM just DDR400, so if I make to 500, my mobo can support it? Performences ll better or weaker?

3)Can I change the divider 4:5 to other?

Thanks!
*
Once you o/c even 1FSB,then is consider doing o/c already on cpu + RAM.If you wish to increase your FSB to 200 then you should try to o/c it to 200FSB then only know whether your system can support or not.No one can tell you the exact anwer here.This depends much on your system setup + hardware used.
RokXIII
post Sep 6 2006, 10:06 PM

C'est la vie, Chérie
******
Senior Member
1,634 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Ipoh @ Puchong


QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Sep 6 2006, 05:27 PM)
Once you o/c even 1FSB,then is consider doing o/c already on cpu + RAM.If you wish to increase your FSB to 200 then you should try to o/c it to 200FSB then only know whether your system can support or not.No one can tell you the exact anwer here.This depends much on your system setup + hardware used.
*
I understand this 1.
But still on the question, can i change the divider? wink.gif
raymond5105
post Sep 7 2006, 07:30 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Sep 6 2006, 10:06 PM)
I understand this 1.
But still on the question, can i change the divider? wink.gif
*
Yes you can change the divider as provided from your mobo's bios.
kasperskyz
post Sep 7 2006, 12:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


my cpu is p4 2.67ghz....how much ghz is the best did i need to oc?
raymond5105
post Sep 7 2006, 01:34 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kasperskyz @ Sep 7 2006, 12:54 PM)
my cpu is p4 2.67ghz....how much ghz is the best did i need to oc?
*
P4 2.67GHz is 533 FSB quad pump.O/cing wise is dependent on your hardware.Maybe you can share out your spec here.We can help you...
kasperskyz
post Sep 7 2006, 01:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


p4 2.67
1gb ddr2 ram
intel d945plrn mobo
ati x300 256mb
80gb pata hdd
dvd combo
raymond5105
post Sep 7 2006, 02:46 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kasperskyz @ Sep 7 2006, 01:41 PM)
p4 2.67
1gb ddr2 ram
intel d945plrn mobo
ati x300 256mb
80gb pata hdd
dvd combo
*
Intel 945 mobo, i not sure whether it can be overclock or not.Do you see and options to change the FSB in bios mode?If yes then you may overclock.
kabukiawie
post Sep 7 2006, 05:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,039 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
But normaly intel board doesn't provide oc settings in the BIOS. If really cannot oc in bios, try clockgen....hehe just my 2 cents

@RokXIII
refer to your mobo menual, the setting for devider should be available. If you able to set it to 1:1, your proc can perform better than mine. C0 steping i think same as mine. hehe. i check tonight blush.gif
RokXIII
post Sep 7 2006, 11:29 PM

C'est la vie, Chérie
******
Senior Member
1,634 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Ipoh @ Puchong


QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 7 2006, 05:05 PM)
But normaly intel board doesn't provide oc settings in the BIOS. If really cannot oc in bios, try clockgen....hehe just my 2 cents

@RokXIII
refer to your mobo menual, the setting for devider should be available. If you able to set it to 1:1, your proc can perform better than mine. C0 steping i think same as mine. hehe. i check tonight blush.gif
*
Thank ur info bro, i gona check it out later, wish it reli can change divider as i jus find inside the bios, nothing can do with the divider, or mayb i dont kno which 1 is use to change it.
raymond5105
post Sep 8 2006, 06:54 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 7 2006, 05:05 PM)
But normaly intel board doesn't provide oc settings in the BIOS. If really cannot oc in bios, try clockgen....hehe just my 2 cents

@RokXIII
refer to your mobo menual, the setting for devider should be available. If you able to set it to 1:1, your proc can perform better than mine. C0 steping i think same as mine. hehe. i check tonight blush.gif
*
Normally hte Intel doesn't support o/c but the new type mobo like the 975X does support o/cing. cool.gif
kabukiawie
post Sep 8 2006, 09:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,039 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Which is it better?

4:5 with 168fsb:208ram loose timing (i doubt my ram can run at this speed)
1:1 with 168fsb:168ram tight timing (currently running)

i will try play around tonight. smile.gif

QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Sep 8 2006, 06:54 AM)
Normally hte Intel doesn't support o/c but the new type mobo like the 975X does support o/cing. cool.gif
*
is it? blush.gif i didn't know that. I just know all type of mobo from Intel are not support oc. tongue.gif



@RokXIII
mine stepping same as yours, my max oc is up to 3.2+GHz but not stable. doh.gif

This post has been edited by kabukiawie: Sep 8 2006, 09:55 AM
raymond5105
post Sep 8 2006, 11:47 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 8 2006, 09:52 AM)
Which is it better?

4:5 with 168fsb:208ram loose timing (i doubt my ram can run at this speed)
1:1 with 168fsb:168ram tight timing (currently running)

i will try play around tonight. smile.gif
is it?  blush.gif i didn't know that. I just know all type of mobo from Intel are not support oc. tongue.gif
@RokXIII
mine stepping same as yours, my max oc is up to 3.2+GHz but not stable. doh.gif
*
If you go to check the core 2 duo then you can see ppl using Intel 975X mobo to o/c. Well if can run on 1:1 at loose timing.Since Intel platform prefer loose timing than tight timing.
kabukiawie
post Sep 8 2006, 12:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,039 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
you mean loose timing perform better for Intel? like 2.5-x-x-x?



raymond5105
post Sep 8 2006, 02:29 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 8 2006, 12:00 PM)
you mean loose timing perform better for Intel? like 2.5-x-x-x?
*
Yes,like the timing of 2.5-4-4-8 or 3.0-4-4-8, The high performance RAM can do at 2-x-x-x
kabukiawie
post Sep 8 2006, 03:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,039 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Sep 8 2006, 02:29 PM)
Yes,like the timing of 2.5-4-4-8 or 3.0-4-4-8, The high performance RAM can do at 2-x-x-x
*
i try and see the different. Thanks for the info. notworthy.gif

211 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0301sec    0.78    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 09:17 PM