QUOTE(startrail @ Aug 12 2006, 08:07 PM)
try to find the menu in ur bios INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD, TIPS,Q n A, Results...Great For NueBis
INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD, TIPS,Q n A, Results...Great For NueBis
|
|
Aug 12 2006, 08:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
889 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Malacca |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2006, 04:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,634 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Ipoh @ Puchong |
guys, can help somthg in this?
![]() i jus wan to kno, can i oc my ram? the divider is 4:5 (actually i'm not understand what does it mean...) now i dunno my ram is 2.5-3-3-8 or 2.5-4-4-8. since the FSB is 167, the divider is 4:5, then 167*(4/5)=133.6, 133.6*2(since it is DDR), equals to 267.2, is that mean i gona change my DRAM frequency to DDR266? correct me if i'm wrong!(i know i must be wrong)... This post has been edited by RokXIII: Aug 23 2006, 02:06 AM |
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 03:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Aug 22 2006, 04:49 AM) guys, can help somthg in this? The 4:5 means for 166FSB you set on the setting,quad 166 will the 668FSB on the CPU-Z. Where your memory you will get 208MHz from this equation (166*5/4).Get what i mean?![]() i jus wan to kno, can i oc my ram? the divider is 4:5 (actually i'm not understand what does it mean...) now i dunno my ram is 2.5-3-3-8 or 2.5-4-4-8. since the FSB is 167, the divider is 4:5, then 167*(4/5)=133.6, 133.6*2(since it is DDR), equals to 267.2, is that mean i gona change my DRAM frequency to DDR266? correct me if i'm wrong!(i know i must be wrong)... |
|
|
Sep 1 2006, 08:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,575 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kelana Jaya,Selangor/Muar,Johor |
|
|
|
Sep 6 2006, 01:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,634 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Ipoh @ Puchong |
Still the RAM QUestion here...
Please c here 1)From the pic above, my RAM frequency 208.8, times 2 is 417 which is closer to 400 coz my RAM is DDR400. So can it be say i OC on a correct way for my RAM? 2)If i keep on OC my proc and make the fsb to 200, then the RAM frequency ll becom 250, times 2 ll becom 500. Since my RAM just DDR400, so if I make to 500, my mobo can support it? Performences ll better or weaker? 3)Can I change the divider 4:5 to other? Thanks! This post has been edited by RokXIII: Sep 6 2006, 01:18 AM |
|
|
Sep 6 2006, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Sep 6 2006, 01:16 AM) Still the RAM QUestion here... Once you o/c even 1FSB,then is consider doing o/c already on cpu + RAM.If you wish to increase your FSB to 200 then you should try to o/c it to 200FSB then only know whether your system can support or not.No one can tell you the exact anwer here.This depends much on your system setup + hardware used.Please c here 1)From the pic above, my RAM frequency 208.8, times 2 is 417 which is closer to 400 coz my RAM is DDR400. So can it be say i OC on a correct way for my RAM? 2)If i keep on OC my proc and make the fsb to 200, then the RAM frequency ll becom 250, times 2 ll becom 500. Since my RAM just DDR400, so if I make to 500, my mobo can support it? Performences ll better or weaker? 3)Can I change the divider 4:5 to other? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 6 2006, 10:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,634 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Ipoh @ Puchong |
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Sep 6 2006, 05:27 PM) Once you o/c even 1FSB,then is consider doing o/c already on cpu + RAM.If you wish to increase your FSB to 200 then you should try to o/c it to 200FSB then only know whether your system can support or not.No one can tell you the exact anwer here.This depends much on your system setup + hardware used. I understand this 1.But still on the question, can i change the divider? |
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 07:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 12:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
121 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
my cpu is p4 2.67ghz....how much ghz is the best did i need to oc?
|
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 01:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 01:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
121 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
p4 2.67
1gb ddr2 ram intel d945plrn mobo ati x300 256mb 80gb pata hdd dvd combo |
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 02:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 05:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,039 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
But normaly intel board doesn't provide oc settings in the BIOS. If really cannot oc in bios, try clockgen....hehe just my 2 cents
@RokXIII refer to your mobo menual, the setting for devider should be available. If you able to set it to 1:1, your proc can perform better than mine. C0 steping i think same as mine. hehe. i check tonight |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 11:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,634 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Ipoh @ Puchong |
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 7 2006, 05:05 PM) But normaly intel board doesn't provide oc settings in the BIOS. If really cannot oc in bios, try clockgen....hehe just my 2 cents Thank ur info bro, i gona check it out later, wish it reli can change divider as i jus find inside the bios, nothing can do with the divider, or mayb i dont kno which 1 is use to change it.@RokXIII refer to your mobo menual, the setting for devider should be available. If you able to set it to 1:1, your proc can perform better than mine. C0 steping i think same as mine. hehe. i check tonight |
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 06:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 7 2006, 05:05 PM) But normaly intel board doesn't provide oc settings in the BIOS. If really cannot oc in bios, try clockgen....hehe just my 2 cents Normally hte Intel doesn't support o/c but the new type mobo like the 975X does support o/cing. @RokXIII refer to your mobo menual, the setting for devider should be available. If you able to set it to 1:1, your proc can perform better than mine. C0 steping i think same as mine. hehe. i check tonight |
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 09:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,039 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Which is it better?
4:5 with 168fsb:208ram loose timing (i doubt my ram can run at this speed) 1:1 with 168fsb:168ram tight timing (currently running) i will try play around tonight. QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Sep 8 2006, 06:54 AM) is it? @RokXIII mine stepping same as yours, my max oc is up to 3.2+GHz but not stable. This post has been edited by kabukiawie: Sep 8 2006, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 11:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Sep 8 2006, 09:52 AM) Which is it better? If you go to check the core 2 duo then you can see ppl using Intel 975X mobo to o/c. Well if can run on 1:1 at loose timing.Since Intel platform prefer loose timing than tight timing.4:5 with 168fsb:208ram loose timing (i doubt my ram can run at this speed) 1:1 with 168fsb:168ram tight timing (currently running) i will try play around tonight. is it? @RokXIII mine stepping same as yours, my max oc is up to 3.2+GHz but not stable. |
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 12:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,039 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
you mean loose timing perform better for Intel? like 2.5-x-x-x?
|
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 03:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,039 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0301sec
0.78
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 09:17 PM |