QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 7 2005, 03:44 PM)
As u wish Mr.LKM Astronomy Photography, Lunar Eclipse on 4 March 2007
Astronomy Photography, Lunar Eclipse on 4 March 2007
|
|
Sep 7 2005, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7 2005, 05:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2005, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(March05 @ Sep 7 2005, 07:17 PM) Counting on you, man. yea2..me also kl..yesterday no chance at all lar.. Disaster here in KL - the sky's totally overcast, and it's drizzling. We need a miracle.... deepyu, are u in KL too? Mr.LKM, how's it looking over in Kluang? I fear, deepyu, our telescope dreams are evaporating fast........ ..telescope.. |
|
|
Sep 12 2005, 10:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
very busy last 3days was hoping u guys can shoot nice pic like tis.. |
|
|
Sep 14 2005, 11:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2005, 12:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(March05 @ Sep 14 2005, 12:05 PM) haha..but instead of buying telescope..we can also do astrophotography withSLR..using 100-300mm lens can give u a nice nebulae or star clusters. so if u do have slr with telephoto lens can shoot lar. wat u need is buy the equatorial equipment tat can follow the stars movement.. and later when have budget ca buy telescope lar.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2005, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 14 2005, 05:01 PM) Sorry, guys...... I lupa to bring the photos to upload here aiyoo..me waiting like crazy... Mr.LKM wat r u waiting for?? buy lar Meade.. Somebody must buy it to keep tis astrophotography forum alive.. I cant see anyone else but u.. |
|
|
Sep 14 2005, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Sep 14 2005, 05:13 PM) (1) Where do you guys shoot around KL/PJ? You go somewhere up hill? (1)dont think kl/pj will allows any astrophoto. (2) Are you willing to take a picture with exposure of 4~5 hours and most probably will be biten by flies? I hope can shoot together, because 4~5 hours for star trails is a long time... at least can talk... (2)normally 2-3hrs can get nice star trails olredi. and pray for no interruption. must use fresh battery unless u found out ur slr died after 1 hour QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Sep 14 2005, 05:17 PM) I saw the equatorial tripod-like stuff... very bulky and does not look anything cheaper than RM2k to my eyes. can get the equatorial thing at around 1k. we need those tracker toOne question, if our camera can manage to do ISO6400 or even higher with acceptable noise performance, then we need no those tracker, right? If that so, maybe dSLR in few more years already can do that.... And the tracker will be a thing of the past? get nice still star/cluster/galaxies pics. u will only get a startrail without it because the earth is moving and we need to move the camera and pointing at the target even the earth is moving. those equatorial will help moving ur camera as the earth moves. |
|
|
Sep 14 2005, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 14 2005, 05:45 PM) Some astro photos need even one hour to expose as they are too faint. If you able to shoot using iso6400, I think most of the ppl will use it to discover more. It needs one hour though so I think the tracker is still needed. yea2 maybe using ISO100 will give good result in avoiding noise. Most of the astrophotographer will use cold-ccd camera to take astrophotography therefore normal DSLR will get damn high noise if it is used to take long exposure photos and at high iso rate. high ISO will collect all the interference in atmosphere. tat y Hubble space telescope is the best. |
|
|
Sep 14 2005, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 14 2005, 06:02 PM) haha..HST is dreamt in 1940s..designed and built in 1970-80..and onlystart its operation in 1990!! HST is teamwork of NASA&ESA.. here for more http://www.stsci.edu/hst/ even bill gates cant afford it lar i think... |
|
|
Sep 15 2005, 09:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(March05 @ Sep 14 2005, 11:30 PM) Wait a few more years and u can get it for free. NASA's abandoning it. U'll have to come up with a maintenance plan.......ha ha. abandoning it? means crashing it deep to atlantic?? even if its up there we'll need few hundred millions to rental NASA's spacecraft.. QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Sep 15 2005, 01:03 AM) Heh man... I think 15 seconds is a great limitation. Minimum must able to use bulb, right? If you are serious, really need to upgrade camera le... at least got excusses to upgrade, right? I believe there are few good used camera around. having slr is a must for astrophoto..or atleast ccdcam..Ok... so KL/PJ will be a real problem... Hope you guys can recommend... Since I am new still to digital, I still yet to know all its extreme technical limitation like battery.. I still remember I can do around 5~6 hours with my EOS A2 with new 2CR5. If worst come to worst, I might even consider DIY with powerful external acid-lead battery pack. I believe as long as the voltage is matched, should be ok. I always believe there are few type of photography are always pushing the equipments to its limit; be it sports (outdoor and indoor) as well as astrophotography. Every ISO as well as size aperture do count... However it is a surprise to hear that a fine tele might not perform as good as telescope. You have your point that telescope is optimise for far distance. But most probablt I will still start with normal tele, and maybe some longer tele primes. Reasons are pretty simple; one lens multi-purpose ma... Just one little question to my curiosity; Did you ever seen anyone shooting astrophotograph with a laptop connecting to the devices (be it normal dSLR or etc)? me also dont have any dslr..shot some startrail using my film slr few yrs before.. if seriously want to do astrophoto have to go somewhere like Mr.LKM's place.. clear sky there.. But a fine tele can perform nice astrophoto for beginner..but for more deep sky photo u'll need the telescope.. shooting with laptop?? never seen any with my eyes but its true. telescope with computer guided system like meade's telescope is normal today. so u can control everything from ur laptop. maybe someday we can shot astrophoto together.. |
|
|
Sep 15 2005, 01:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Sep 15 2005, 01:03 PM) Where does Mr. LKM stay? And how tired will it be to climb the mountain....? Mr.LKM is at Kluang..so I think nice sky overthere..I am still pretty new to digital in a sense that compare to what I know about film and my old camera, where almost every technical limitation was predictable. Ya... lots of films (money) were spent of testing and knowing the limits. yeap...u will need everything for a night or two camping. QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Sep 15 2005, 01:03 PM) By the way, I used to do some star trail before... but that was with film... and somehow under-exposed even for 5 hours shot! 5hours and still underexposed?? I tried for about 2 hours..with ISO100 slide film and it turn up to be ok..not underexposed. maybe little bit overexposed.. |
|
|
Sep 15 2005, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 15 2005, 08:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(wasabi @ Sep 15 2005, 03:50 PM) great idea, it would be first(?) camping from lowyat-kakis ... hood can prevent light from entering the lens..but cant solve theprevent from light pollution? use hood? deepyu -> Tmn melawati. lights? true also, but i scare of darkness.hey dare u go to some Mt. away from light 15min for daytime.. sky's light pollution problem. we have to go somewhere with clear view.. far from city to get nice astrophoto..place like u mentioned maybe can also. easy to go. dont climb in darkness lar..climb in daylight..camp and wait for the nite.. and of course not alone lar |
|
|
Sep 16 2005, 06:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 16 2005, 06:00 PM) Walky-Talky START:"Ahh!! Who touched my ass?" Just kidding maybe i'll contact him... deepyu, have you contacted the local dealer of Meade telescope? If you want to buy something from him, you have to act fast as he is going to Chile ( the best place for celestial observing in this planet! )and he will be leaving in September 18 and back in October 15. btw the 3 stars maybe not a star..maybe a satellite..who knows unless we check it. ur gas cloud not colourful enough lar thanks for sharing arr.. |
|
|
Sep 16 2005, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 16 2005, 06:29 PM) If the background of that "gas cloud" is black, it will be wonderful... Got way to check whether they are satelites? i think u can check it if u have the meade's autostar. or otherastronomy navigation software. if i'm not mistaken they also includes some satelite's infos..maybe except the confidential one.. |
|
|
Sep 21 2005, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(March05 @ Sep 21 2005, 01:42 PM) yeap..saw it there also..good shot. but march if u want to shoot tis kind of moon pics dont think u can do it with EX S500 or Caplio GX8. Tis guy using Nikon 8700 with 8x zooming capability.and I think he is using the max zoom to get this shot. |
|
|
Sep 21 2005, 04:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 21 2005, 04:32 PM) What did u mean by CLICK! ? Mr.LKM u shot ur pic using auto mode rite? u need to shoot with high shutter speedMarch05, Hey man, your choices are not suitable for the types of photography you want I am wondering how was the guy able to shoot with so many details. Every of mine shots were all overexposed, wonder if photoshop able to solve overexposed problem... See? My moon... ![]() to get like tat guy's pic. and doing some digital zooming. try to shoot with ur KM Z3 with max shutter.1/1000 i think. |
|
|
Sep 21 2005, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 21 2005, 05:21 PM) than maybe u're rite.actually as u can see ur shot is overexposed..means too much light entering ur lens. faster speed means shorter time to gain light. so u can shot the moon surface, not the moon's light. and do focus on the moon. not the sky. |
|
|
Sep 21 2005, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
815 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: selangor |
QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Sep 21 2005, 04:32 PM) I am wondering how was the guy able to shoot with so many details. Every of mine shots were all overexposed, wonder if photoshop able to solve overexposed problem... http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=196633&st=20 FoxtrotZulu's nice moon pics with details. And maybe the easiest way is to shoot when the moon is not too bright.evening and morning would be best i think. |
| Change to: | 0.0314sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 12:26 AM |