Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 56 57 58 59 60 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V7, Nikon announcement on Mar/Apr ?!

views
     
eddy230379
post Mar 28 2011, 04:57 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 28 2011, 03:21 PM)
I don't think I can post my street shooting soon. I still owing my friend for last company trip sad.gif
*
a few more days than you can upload already bro ... i posted a few already ... so waiting for yours & beannie's ...
fcuk90
post Mar 28 2011, 05:11 PM

ef eg ek es
*******
Senior Member
7,863 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: highbury
street shooting too

user posted image
DSC_0394 by fcuk90, on Flickr
celciuz
post Mar 28 2011, 05:17 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Mar 28 2011, 04:27 PM)
tried both at Nikon centre
i wouldn say im not in love with 85G, but 24G is my dream wub.gif
*
I tried the 24G and 35G, not so addicted as the 85G though tongue.gif.
fcuk90
post Mar 28 2011, 05:19 PM

ef eg ek es
*******
Senior Member
7,863 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: highbury
^ maybe you like shoot model more ? so 85g? laugh.gif
geekster129
post Mar 28 2011, 05:19 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*
Between 70200 and 85G, which is more addictive? brows.gif
aldosoesilo
post Mar 28 2011, 05:19 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
Spam.
FB compression. if you don't mind.
not street though. it was my trip in bukit tabur.
user posted image
celciuz
post Mar 28 2011, 05:21 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(fcuk90 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:19 PM)
^ maybe you like shoot model more ? so 85g? laugh.gif
*
Because I already have a 1635 tongue.gif That is why 24 and 35 not exactly that addictive.

QUOTE(geekster129 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:19 PM)
Between 70200 and 85G, which is more addictive? brows.gif
*
Different usage!
Bliz
post Mar 28 2011, 05:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 28 2011, 05:21 PM)

Different usage!
*
Exactly, best is to get both thumbup.gif . If i really have to suggest, I would say 70-200vr2 first drool.gif
weirdo88
post Mar 28 2011, 05:24 PM

me is noob =D
******
Senior Member
1,338 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: kuala lumpur
user posted image
aldosoesilo
post Mar 28 2011, 05:24 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
celciuz
post Mar 28 2011, 05:24 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Panda look so funny hahaha!
weirdo88
post Mar 28 2011, 05:25 PM

me is noob =D
******
Senior Member
1,338 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: kuala lumpur
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 28 2011, 05:24 PM)
Panda look so funny hahaha!
*
lol she jealous max di XD
jchue73
post Mar 28 2011, 05:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:19 PM)
Between 70200 and 85G, which is more addictive? brows.gif
You raised some good points. If you're shooting events or in a crowd, you cannot beat the 70-200mm f/2.8 for versatility. If you shoot one on one and pay the model for a private shooting, then yes you can have the 85mm f/1.4 as you'll have all the time to compose your framing.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 28 2011, 05:21 PM)
Because I already have a 1635 tongue.gif That is why 24 and 35 not exactly that addictive.
Speaking about 24mm f/1.4, even though it overlaps with 3 of my other lenses, it's very special and has a special light gathering ability.

QUOTE(Bliz @ Mar 28 2011, 05:23 PM)
Exactly, best is to get both  thumbup.gif . If i really have to suggest, I would say 70-200vr2 first  drool.gif
laugh.gif Yup. Get both. drool.gif


Kent3888
post Mar 28 2011, 05:41 PM

:+: ҜễЙΨ ™ © :+:
******
Senior Member
1,333 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI
That day bought a 2nd hand 17-55, after went home den notice y the image so soft compared to the 1 I test in BTS, den open the aperture blade look under the light, noticed there's somethin like moisture in the middle of the elements. After drop by PKNS den they said it's fungus..... swt!! Luckily the seller gave me 1 month personal warranty den I returned to him.....

Now searching for seller, haaaiz....

Wanna ask you guys, give same price, will u get a 1 year+ 17-55mm or a 1 month old 16-35 F4 VR? If not bcoz of value, I prefer the 17-55 personally, any advise?
aldosoesilo
post Mar 28 2011, 05:44 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:41 PM)
That day bought a 2nd hand 17-55, after went home den notice y the image so soft compared to the 1 I test in BTS, den open the aperture blade look under the light, noticed there's somethin like moisture in the middle of the elements. After drop by PKNS den they said it's fungus..... swt!! Luckily the seller gave me 1 month personal warranty den I returned to him.....

Now searching for seller, haaaiz....

Wanna ask you guys, give same price, will u get a 1 year+ 17-55mm or a 1 month old 16-35 F4 VR? If not bcoz of value, I prefer the 17-55 personally, any advise?
*
16-35 on DX is not shinny (personal opinion)
celciuz
post Mar 28 2011, 05:45 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Alamak, fungus? -.-... that guy don't store in a dry box is it? Pity such a lens affected.
scotty
post Mar 28 2011, 05:53 PM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya
go for the dx king.
geekster129
post Mar 28 2011, 05:58 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:32 PM)
You raised some good points. If you're shooting events or in a crowd, you cannot beat the 70-200mm f/2.8 for versatility. If you shoot one on one and pay the model for a private shooting, then yes you can have the 85mm f/1.4 as you'll have all the time to compose your framing.
Speaking about 24mm f/1.4, even though it overlaps with 3 of my other lenses, it's very special and has a special light gathering ability.
laugh.gif Yup. Get both.  drool.gif
*
Hahaha... easier to say.. that's the problem when I enjoy shooting portraits and weddings at the same time...=.=;;
jchue73
post Mar 28 2011, 06:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:58 PM)
Hahaha... easier to say.. that's the problem when I enjoy shooting portraits and weddings at the same time...=.=;;
Don't need to get the latest N lenses lor. Get the AF-D 80-200mm f/2.8 and AF-D 85mm f/1.4. Don't need to get the latest and greatest. I'm also shooting with these two. Well, not exactly since my 80-200mm f/2.8 is the AF-S version.
Everdying
post Mar 28 2011, 06:40 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 28 2011, 05:41 PM)
That day bought a 2nd hand 17-55, after went home den notice y the image so soft compared to the 1 I test in BTS, den open the aperture blade look under the light, noticed there's somethin like moisture in the middle of the elements. After drop by PKNS den they said it's fungus..... swt!! Luckily the seller gave me 1 month personal warranty den I returned to him.....

Now searching for seller, haaaiz....

Wanna ask you guys, give same price, will u get a 1 year+ 17-55mm or a 1 month old 16-35 F4 VR? If not bcoz of value, I prefer the 17-55 personally, any advise?
*
U never check lens properly before buying?
Anyway i also got a used 17-55...
16-35 also ok lens la...depends what u wanna shoot.
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

126 Pages « < 56 57 58 59 60 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0431sec    0.66    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 11:49 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.