QUOTE(makoshark @ Mar 19 2011, 10:31 PM)
Save in the highest quality modePhotography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V7, Nikon announcement on Mar/Apr ?!
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V7, Nikon announcement on Mar/Apr ?!
|
|
Mar 19 2011, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(SSY22 @ Mar 20 2011, 10:17 PM) Everdying, thanks for clearing me. I tot you talking about AF-S. My bad for not understand you. It will work, in fact today i forgotten to change my selector switch to AF-S and still got in focus shots So with AF-C+Single point , i can recompose my subject right ? Let say i am using center focus on my subject which is on middle in my viewfinder , so i wan to recompose it to right. So is that works ? in what situation using dynamic area? |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Mar 20 2011, 10:28 PM) Yes the colour really pops, even so than my 70-200vr2 Added on March 20, 2011, 10:31 pm QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Mar 20 2011, 10:29 PM) firstly, cute model u got there Never do any pp, i did use some bounce flash to get some catch light on her eyes good that u got it already. with continuous AF, just kejar ur subject with the point that u use This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 10:31 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Mar 20 2011, 10:32 PM) RAW converted to JPEG using the default adobe standard profile, then i upload to flickR Added on March 20, 2011, 10:33 pm QUOTE(Bliz @ Mar 20 2011, 10:32 PM) RAW converted to JPEG using the default adobe standard profile, then i upload to flickR This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 10:33 PMBTW, that shot was stopped down to F/2, maybe that's why higher contrast |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Mar 20 2011, 10:40 PM) Wonder how you produce those color, As I have mentioned earlier, I shot RAW, then converted to JPEG using the standard adobe colour profile under LR3... anyway here's another one to demonstrate the amazing sharpness wide open ( can even see the imperfections clearly are them straight out of camera and did some contrast / saturation adjustment only? its so amazing ![]() DSC_8480 by Bliz®, on Flickr This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 10:54 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Mar 20 2011, 10:48 PM) Like that also arrogant? Added on March 20, 2011, 10:50 pm QUOTE(nivlanauk @ Mar 20 2011, 10:48 PM) One hot and one cute This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 10:50 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
2 more photos before I go to bed
![]() DSC_8186 by Bliz®, on Flickr ![]() DSC_8191 by Bliz®, on Flickr Added on March 20, 2011, 11:05 pm QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Mar 20 2011, 11:02 PM) nice job, makes the eyes looks nicer Yes the D version of the lens has very pale colour, I have used the D version of the lens a few times before deciding to get G instead and just a note to others, i dont own a G, just a D, the colors are not as good as the G ofcuz, but its way better than nifty fifty lolz QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 20 2011, 11:03 PM) Nice theme n pics Blitz..... This morn I went BTS to try out 16-35VR vs 17-55 f/2.8, end up the 17-55 looks much better contrast, saturation and sharpness eh =.= Thanx mate..Well I have not tested 17-55, but 16-35 has very good colour/contrast to me already, probably due to the F/2.8 that's why look better? No idea This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 11:05 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 20 2011, 11:11 PM) No.... both shot at same aperture n settings, the Nikon guy say mayb using DX, the outcome of 16-35 not so good, I wonder y.... since 16-35 got N coat summore,so disappointed ler.... at 1st thought after try to confirm in BTS den can straight buy dy, but end up If u are going FX soon, just get the 16-35 else get the 17-55 first and sell it after u get FX. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 20 2011, 11:18 PM) Going for plan 2..... From the pics above the 17-55 seems to be better, must be due to stop down 1 stop compared to F/4 of 16-35 Contrast n Saturation Comparison » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 11:24 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 20 2011, 11:28 PM) I don wanna get it 1st coz sure I seldom use it.... den the value depreciating in the black box!! not so active in shooting models unlike Malacca gang so strong..... event once a while oni, lol.... got my siggy50mm liao, den get this 1755 gao dim.... slowly fund for VRII U guys at KL damn many activities leh, Melaka here no events also, we all find models ourselves |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 20 2011, 11:33 PM) Event shooting=bored, fight with so many people Added on March 20, 2011, 11:38 pm QUOTE(razuryza @ Mar 20 2011, 11:32 PM) Not all friends can be models This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 20 2011, 11:38 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2011, 11:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 09:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0223sec
0.69
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 02:18 AM |