QUOTE(cockerish @ May 24 2006, 11:49 AM)
no really, windows 98 took almost 700 plus mb to install, windows xp took around 2gigs or so but i dont understand, vista needs 15gigs of free space?
what the hell is wrong with msoft?
its either its too bloated up or something is really wrong
what the hell is wrong with msoft?
its either its too bloated up or something is really wrong
QUOTE(allvin @ May 24 2006, 03:31 PM)
i think u guys make so mistake la! my frie install vista beta just 6Gb le! How come 15gb 
maybe the beta2 got adding some stuff. Kinda weird. 15GB
Well, a few points that i can think ofmaybe the beta2 got adding some stuff. Kinda weird. 15GB
- They might not need 15GB anyway, it's a prudent prediction and it doesn't mean 15GB will be used after the installation, some are reserved for page file and other purposes.
- Storage is real cheap nowadays. 120GB HDD doesn't cost that much. And if you've 200GB of storage, 15GB doesn't even exceed 10% of it.
- You can't compare legacy OS with new OS. Windows XP took 2GB, Windows 98 took 700MB, Windows 1.0 took one floppy disk. But what can you do now with Win 1.0? It has to grow.
Of course, if you think you can do whatever you want with your Win98/XP now, then you can go ahead with it. But one day your OS will be obsolete (as you can see now WLM and WMP11 don't support Win2000) and you can't avoid that.
- Consuming more storage space won't really make the system bloated or slowing down the performance. It's the number of processes and the consumption of RAM that matters
May 24 2006, 05:47 PM
Quote
0.0318sec
0.89
6 queries
GZIP Disabled