Comparing Taylors to LUCT; I would highly recommend LUCT without any reservations on my part.

Based on my research;

Firstly, all degree, diploma, & foundation programs in general at LUCT are really very reasonably priced (which is certainly a very surprising matter to me); and their programs also cost significantly much cheaper compared to the similar but overpriced programs at Taylors. (It certainly surprised the hell out of me when I checked & compared.) I should have pursued my architecture studies in LUCT instead of Taylors; I am now regretting every single cent of it. (But it is my problem, however, now that you have came to know about it; you can certainly save yourself from it.)

For example, the foundation in the Natural & the Build environment (or FNBE) at Taylors cost twice as much as the architecture foundation program at LUCT; Taylors' FNBE program cost about RM 20K for one year, wheres LUCT's arch. foundation program cost only just about RM 10K for one year as well. (This should give you the idea of how much more Taylors is really charging everybody who comes to it, and they are surging fast & very hugely popular I need to warn you; so the confidence in charging high fees will remain & it will soar even higher in the near future...)

Just take a look at the other programs & compare the pricing as well and you will suddenly notice how much more expensive Taylors is...; you will notice that for every similar programs in degree or diploma level at LUCT & Taylors; Taylors' programs would always cost significantly more by RM 10 - 20K at-least...

Finally, at LUCT, you will definitely be having more freedom in your courses; from what I could very well see, the lecturers at LUCT generally tend to treat you as adults/grown-ups, and give you more flexibility & options; in general they will have more confidence in you. (At Taylors, the lecturers tend to be very restrictive, controlling, & sometimes treat you like school kids.)
Nevertheless, it can all get rather too lenient/laid-back/generous in LUCT from what I have heard; where it is very hard for lecturers to fail any students (even those who really deserves to fail); and then it is always far too easy to obtain truly excellent grades..., and perhaps the criteria(s) of an assignment are also not as strictly enforced; but rather being more open ended & flexible, and lecturers also don't tend to care too much; as long as you do the works & deliver, submit the assignments & attend the presentation & exams; all would definitely be truly well with you. (Whether these sounds good to you or not is for you to decide.)

However, I took a look at the works produced by LUCT students and they are certainly truly amazing for what they intent to be...
The bottom line is; choose what you want, but the fact remains that Taylors is significantly more expensive than LUCT in literally every respect I could see... (It was just too bad that my parents thought LUCT was more expensive than Taylors; which was why Taylors is the one that was highly recommended in my list at that point of time.)

It has ever been a common misconception that LUCT is always more expensive. (Perhaps it is due to their taste, style, and their way of portraying themselves in public that make them be interpreted as more expensive...)

I was also personally lead to believe that LUCT is really darn expensive, and they are the MOST expensive of all... (Obviously they are not.)
"The greater evils are the ones that hides behind the seemingly normal & humble looking white-washed office walls of a typical squarish office building (where nothing looks wrong; it can't be expensive "says the interested people"); but once inside, it charges exorbitantly high premium fees equivalent to opulent-palatial-style luxury rates..." (But yet the people still do not know about it & apply; thinking it is the cheapest around... Yes, admittedly I was also one of the victims. )

Bear in mind, that back then, Taylors (P.J.) was still just a normal-humble looking office building specifically just being only the basic rental spaces on a few selected levels... (as they do not own the entire building); wheres LUCT at that point of time was already a huge and established campus of its own. (And at that point of time, the fees at Taylors was already more expensive; but people are telling me that LUCT is more expensive; and I believed because I never knew that the fees at Taylors is more expensive back then...)
Regards.