Well, the author is entitled to his/her opinion no matter what...

In this case, the author is certainly 'bias' towards the emotional/emotive response, conceptual, "process (trial & error/go with the flow) - based", expressive, subjective/playful approach, flamboyant, spontaneous, & (or) "perceptual" aspects in design/architecture; as "opposed" to any attempted objectivity, formal/serious approach, the technicalities, systematic procedure based, technology, predefined-settings, established tradition/theories/principles, "functional/objective" approach, and (or) any form of predefined/preconceived rules & orders in architecture (that one might already be having at the beginning - and ready to be executed into final productions immediately).

Even within the design studios here at Taylors, it has ever been a constant war/battle/conflict and also an increasingly tough effort to try to justify or to uphold one of this sides in architecture. However, "Most" of the students at Taylors are always very typically/characteristically found on one of this two sides, while only a very small handful of minorities (if there is even 0.1% of such at Taylors) are riding the other side/territory (hint: and this particular group do not create or fancy colorful looking presentation boards and or "pompous" / "pretentious" form making).

Regards.

yes. but here's the problem. u did a twinning programme.

twinning programmes not only not recognised by LAM currently, it will never be recognised ever. do talk to LAM people to see how they could solve ur predicament.

just to be clear: u FINISHED ur diploma in taylor's, then did a 1 year degree?
or did u studied in taylor's for 3 years (without graduating) then proceed for another year in australia?