or is it Eizo ???

I think it is Eizo haha!

I just know it is pricey and apparently very good color production, just like those Dell Ultrasharp series or maybe better?

One who knows about monitor will definitely heads for IPS (In-Plane Switching) panel, example the Dell U2410 LCD, Apple Cinema Display or HP LP2475w. With bare eye alone, you'll able to notice how different this type of monitor will be compared with normal consumer TN panel such as Dell ST2410, those Samsung, Viewsonic, etc.

If I recalled correctly, Dell 2707WFP is IPS panel too

Mac don't brag about spec. Mac can do good in almost a lot of things especially when it comes to editing photo or video. We don't say spec matters nor Mac is designed for being so, but Mac talks about features and why having one could be great. Please don't get me wrong, I'm yet a Mac user but I do know how powerful a Mac can be and why people going crazy for Apple's products.

When you own a Mac, remember this.

"Don't try to think how to do it in a Mac, but instead think of how to do it with a Mac". We don't transport our Windows knowledge to utilize a Mac

Mac with Radeon not interesting as ever anymore

Why it isn't?

I been a Radeon user all these while (since migrated from Nvidia) and actually happy that Apple takes in Radeon instead of Nvidia this time. Back then and all these while there are a lot of debates and competition between Nvidia and Radeon.

My thoughts are... Nvidia may win in number (benchmark) but losing out in actual quality. No offence to Nvidia, but last time there was a comparison done by zooming into further detail with sniper in a shooting game, it turns out that the background was rendered boxy by Nvidia but still smooth with Radeon. The comparison was done side by side by two different desktops.

I don't know about entertainment users but I myself who only seek mac for 3D application working purposes (I major in digital animation) found that many 3D programs can't be fully supported by Radeon already.

For movie? Yes. I prefer Radeon's colour than Nvidia. My entertainment desktop that connects to my LED TV housing 2 crossfire 5870s

cause Nvidia are better at workstation graphic card.
radeon excel at gaming graphic card.

for me i just grab a budget card haha....poor now
using GTS250 only after my 8800GTS die

Oh~ I do not know about 3D application processing counterpart as I only pointing at gaming and video performance. Apologize

Sounds so right, Radeon never make an impact in 3D editing cards but they do good in gaming and video playback. Anyway, Radeon's color processing still arguably better than Nvidia which in this case, fall for us photographers. Isn't?

IIRC Adobe has hardware acceleration capability only with Nvidia GPU, I not sure whether Radeon also have or not

This post has been edited by edwardgsk: Mar 11 2011, 01:05 PM

wah i really blur when u guys talk about computers..i dont know nothing!

i also duno.

btw, just test my office monitor ... the white saturation is poor performance...DELL duno which series.

---

Added on March 11, 2011, 1:04 pm

**this one i really not sure... correct me if i m wrong.**

This post has been edited by Agito666: Mar 11 2011, 01:04 PM

Yeah Dell 2707WFP is IPS panel, TN panel has really lousy quality ... but the colours on Mac look really nice and real

Bliz , dia boleh , you boleh =)


Hopefully !!!

Thanks.

This post has been edited by SSY22: Mar 11 2011, 01:40 PM

i'm still funding for a 85 1.4

Wanting to own a pro gear at least for once in my lifetime.

This post has been edited by geekster129: Mar 11 2011, 01:53 PM

That's the spirit, pairing it with D3s?

don't know nothing mean know everything isn't it?

5870 CF for watching movies? o_O

Adobe does support hardware acceleration with Radeon.

Pro lens and pro body?

Should be better ! Ultrasharp consider beginner level for those designer

@bold : Talk like Steve Job's Slave

D700 also good enough for me already.