Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V6, Nikon announcement on Mar/Apr ?!

views
     
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 08:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 13 2011, 08:01 PM)
Yeah, I had a few private photos with them when my client is not around wahahaha! laugh.gif
*
Jealous rclxub.gif can show some pictures? tongue.gif
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 09:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Mar 13 2011, 09:01 PM)
That's y lor... I think since 1st larger investment on lens, get a more "shi ji" de lens....  I mean higher IQ reproduction, more robust like weather seal
*
Why bother with weather seal since yours also not pro body cry.gif ..I also don't give a damn about the weather seal wink.gif
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 10:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 13 2011, 10:00 PM)
bro bliz got a very special offer...
he save alot...
consider open box set...
lucky him...
hehe...
*
Heh, shh don't tell anyone laugh.gif
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 10:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Mar 13 2011, 10:06 PM)
Interesting. smile.gif. Does this work for D3100 too? My fren is using D3100 + SB600.
How to set it up? (on the SB600 for optical trigger)
*
D3100 can't trigger using CLS cos the built in flash doesn't support commander mode, only D90 and above got it ( For the current gen of nikon SLR, older gen i am not sure wink.gif )

Added on March 13, 2011, 10:10 pm
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 13 2011, 10:09 PM)
PM me the offer you got laugh.gif  laugh.gif
*
Oklah i share here, RM3800 shocking.gif

This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 13 2011, 10:10 PM
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 10:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 13 2011, 10:12 PM)
Damn cheap! What's the differences with a new unit? That one is demo unit?
*
No difference with new unit except the smell tongue.gif , fellow used twice and wanna downgrade to 1.4D doh.gif

Added on March 13, 2011, 10:15 pm
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 13 2011, 10:10 PM)
F!! I also want!! drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif
*
Hehe it's with me now rclxm9.gif

QUOTE(SSY22 @ Mar 13 2011, 10:12 PM)
3.8k for 85mm 1.4g?!!
*
Yes rm3800 for 1.4g, barely used item brows.gif that's why i purchased it way earlier than my schedule.. Suppose to get it after 2-3 months sweat.gif

This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 13 2011, 10:15 PM
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 10:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 13 2011, 10:21 PM)
I am Loled. with your comment bro CY. biggrin.gif
cry like shit  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
maybe that fella suddenly need money for something.  tongue.gif
*
Not everybody likes the colour of the G version, the pale looking colour of the D version is better for skintone  laugh.gif

P.S.. he cries like shit also i won't return his G lens, unless he buys using RM4600 from me  whistling.gif 



This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 13 2011, 10:25 PM
Bliz
post Mar 13 2011, 10:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 13 2011, 10:42 PM)
For people who lazy do pp like me, maybe I suit D lens more? tongue.gif
*
G lens all the way, D lens is prone to missfocus everynow and then laugh.gif .. U can't use AFC mode with the D, so damn sux with it doh.gif

Added on March 13, 2011, 10:47 pm
QUOTE(SSY22 @ Mar 13 2011, 10:37 PM)
lol !!  doh.gif  doh.gif
*
rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 13 2011, 10:47 PM
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 05:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 14 2011, 12:28 AM)
Lens f/4 ? only f/2.8 or bigger la tongue.gif
*
F/4 for UWA is really fine for me rclxms.gif
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 05:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 14 2011, 05:43 AM)
Then once you play with 14-24 you will go cookoo  rclxms.gif
*
Played with it before, yes it's very sharp but i can't use filter so it really bothers me, no VR+really heavy so it's out... 16-35 is much more useful range, 24mm on FX is still damn wide

This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 14 2011, 05:48 AM
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 12:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(ReeNz @ Mar 14 2011, 12:41 PM)
You are using D3100 right? correct me if I'm wrong but i dont think u can autofocus with tokina 11-16
*
U are right, can't AF with tokina lens on D3100, time to change the lousy body laugh.gif
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 02:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 14 2011, 01:49 PM)
but sigmalux is famous of their bad quality control right?
I am ready for manual focus on UWA for the timing instead of upgrade to d7k.
I think the lens is worth for investment.  rclxub.gif
unsure.gif
get the lens first or body first?
laugh.gif wallet winking..
*
If u can't decide, don't buy.. Nobody knows what u want
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(gnome @ Mar 14 2011, 02:12 PM)
If you actually follow his chronicle from the last few thread you'll be amazed, today 50mm sigma, tomorrow 70200 VR2, then another thing and its go on and on until now laugh.gif

IMO get a "proper" body first ie with motor then you can go all berserk on which lens you wanna get tongue.gif
*
That's why i told him not to buy, he don't even know what he wants...gearhead? laugh.gif

Added on March 14, 2011, 3:14 pm
QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Mar 14 2011, 02:14 PM)
Hmm 14-24 for rm5.3k. Should I buy now? New unit with 1 yr warranty.
*
Local price is around RM5800, i rather test and shop before spending that kind of money sweat.gif

This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 14 2011, 03:14 PM
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 14 2011, 03:15 PM)
I want tokina 11-16 and sigma 50mm ==a
but I will only get 1 for the time being. it is fixed  rolleyes.gif
I thought I clearly cited there.
as for nikkor 70-200 VRII it doesn't really interest me yet.
because I know I wouldn't use that lens often and some more I am out budget for that.
*
Set your priority right, buy what u use the most.. For me my first lens was 70-200vr2 laugh.gif cos i am a portrait lover, after that i get UWA, then few days ago I got myself 85 1.4g... that's it for my lens lineup, each lens has its own usage
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 14 2011, 03:17 PM)
Really!?

Like that I will check with my suppliers, if they still no stock I'll ask them to cancel then you grab it for me ok?
*
Lol dun bother with heng anymore la seems like damn difficult to get the plastic hood shakehead.gif
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
Bored, took out my EP2 and did a portrait for my 85 1.4g tongue.gif

user posted image
Nikkor 85 f/1.4G AF-S by Bliz®, on Flickr
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(loverjinx @ Mar 14 2011, 03:40 PM)
im a FX user , using D700 at the moment. landscape, portraits and street photography are what interests me. i like the 24-70 range but i do not have anything wider than the 24mm now. am thinking whether or not to sell the sigma 24-70 and my 80-200mm two touch and just get the 24-70 nikon lens.
*
Sell the sigma and get nikkor 16-35, just like what i did
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 14 2011, 03:48 PM)
16-35 distortion very ugly.
*
Doesnt seem to be a problem with me, one tick at lightroom solves all the problem smile.gif
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 03:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
If u want minimal distortion by all means spend a lot of cash on a wideangle prime
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 04:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 14 2011, 04:17 PM)
if got d budget...
go for sigma one...
at least d colour is good...
compare to tamron vc...
as i use d tamron before...
*
You failed to mention one very important thing for the sigma, the AF of the sigma lens is always better than the equivalent tamron lens, tamron is always slow and hunting badly during lowlight doh.gif
Bliz
post Mar 14 2011, 04:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 14 2011, 04:40 PM)
14-24 very good. Just another 1k on top of 16-35 wink.gif
*
I choose the 16-35 over the 14-24 not because of budget, because of the following reason

1. 16-35 has a more useful range to me, can stay on camera longer
2. can use filter
3. lighter+VR

Never regret not getting the 14-24
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0365sec    1.11    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 12:58 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.