Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Sony Alpha Thread V51!, The Orange Legion

views
     
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 4 2011, 10:04 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(ieR @ Mar 4 2011, 08:59 PM)
all lens when reach further extend (zoom in) will slowdown in af. no matter ssm or magic motor.
*
I see! biggrin.gif I thought mine got problem alrd. Haha! Thanks sifu! notworthy.gif

QUOTE(iamKiet @ Mar 4 2011, 08:39 PM)
if you are asking about the SSM/USM in lenses,then YES,they are faster & more quiet than screw driven lenses. For SAM,I feel the AF speed is same or sometimes lower than screw-driven  tongue.gif  Sometimes depends on the lens also,my tamron 17-50 f2.8 is much faster than SAL1870  biggrin.gif
*
Hmm. You comparing the 1750 with the 1870? hmm.gif You mean the 1870 no motor in lens? shocking.gif


Newbieeeeee
post Mar 4 2011, 10:21 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(yuhi @ Mar 4 2011, 10:16 PM)
Yea, SAL1870 has no motor in lens. The new 1855SAM kit lens has the SAM motor in its lens
*
Omg. shocking.gif I see. hmm.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 4 2011, 10:29 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(ieR @ Mar 4 2011, 10:25 PM)
2 min. smile.gif i pro already ma
*
rclxms.gif Perasannya. blush.gif

QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 4 2011, 10:23 PM)
doesnt matter anyway since all alpha bodies are screw drive lens compatible... there's no big issue about it.. unlike Nikon's entry level bodies, which only support lenses with in-lens motor
*
True true. wink.gif

QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Mar 4 2011, 10:27 PM)
u didnt know meh? thats why 1870 always gear stripped.
*
I ddn't know. Never touched the 1870 before. blush.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 4 2011, 10:37 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(cyruz13 @ Mar 4 2011, 10:35 PM)
@hiansitt , gjtan , 8tvt : Yup Trade in my A200 + SAL 18-70
actually not consider trade in as well, the shop owner call a buyer (i think from another shop) and come have a look, that buyer offer me directly Rm750...  shop name: Mega Star @ Penang Road, Georgetown smile.gif

@lwliam: sifu, can explain more about the MF 8mm FE that you mention? i got Samyang 8mm FE as well, still trying to learn on the MF tinggie.. unsure.gif

@Newbiee: hehe Thanks thanks.. now i join u alrdy .. tongue.gif
*
Ohhh. a200 + 1870. I thought a200 only. doh.gif

So fast got FE. Good good! Get ready for more poison. brows.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 4 2011, 10:44 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(cyruz13 @ Mar 4 2011, 10:35 PM)

@lwliam: sifu, can explain more about the MF 8mm FE that you mention? i got Samyang 8mm FE as well, still trying to learn on the MF tinggie.. unsure.gif
*
Red this. Very useful

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials...al-distance.htm
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 08:15 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(albnok @ Mar 5 2011, 02:19 AM)
Newbieeeeee: You could spot meter on the flowers and do a +1 EV - colors would look loads better.

Try buzzing around the flower like a bee until you find an angle you feel is 'magical' and has 'feel'.

You can use Focus Check Live View on your A580 - solves the problem of getting precise focus. That said the DOF is so big that you don't have to be exact!

Motor in lens versus motor in body, depends on the lens and focal length, and the gear ratios of the lens. There are slow and noisy focusing lenses with internal motors as well as fast and quiet screw-driven lenses.

*
Alright. Thanks!


Added on March 5, 2011, 8:51 amWow, Check out their ISO performance! notworthy.gif



This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Mar 5 2011, 08:51 AM
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 10:13 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


Minolta 2875 f2.8 good lens? Why is it so cheap compared to the cz2470?
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 10:58 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(zstan @ Mar 5 2011, 10:54 AM)
1.because it can't do 24mm

2. because it doesn't have SSM

3. because it's not called Carl Zeiss  tongue.gif

otherwise... flare control...centre to corner sharpeness.. CA control..distortion... cz2470 would most likely to excel in these areas(especially when wide open) compared to the minolta..anyway just guessing only i've never touched the 2875 before.  smile.gif
*
I see. Because theres this guy in the garage sales selling it for Rm1350. The CZ2470 is Rm5000 yo.

Anyways, Tyvm! smile.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:02 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Mar 5 2011, 10:59 AM)
for APSC bodies better get 1750 tammy liao... or 1680 CZ (tho not 2.8)....  rclxms.gif
*
No laah. Not getting. Just asking. No money liao. tongue.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:05 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Mar 5 2011, 11:04 AM)
just saying liao. HAHAHAHA....
*
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Mar 5 2011, 11:24 AM
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:20 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


Why do people get the Tamron SP 90 F2.8 instead of the SP60 F2? If get the SP90 can sell 50mmf1.8 portrait lens liao? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Mar 5 2011, 11:25 AM
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:29 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 5 2011, 11:28 AM)
is the sp60 even available on a-mount? hmm.gif
*
http://shashinki.com/shop/tamron-60mm-auto...facturers_id=41
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:33 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 5 2011, 11:31 AM)
the last time eddybeh won the sp60, they said no A-mount... oh well... but the sp60 i think is costlier than the 90
*
But its F2. 60mm should be enough for macro right? hmm.gif

QUOTE(kopitiam @ Mar 5 2011, 11:31 AM)
like what sifu achew said (where is he btw? hmm.gif ) sp90 too sharp for portrait laugh.gif
*
Whaaa? Got too sharp one meh? hmm.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:37 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 5 2011, 11:36 AM)
it totally depends on what you're shooting really... go get one, u'll know...

now using CZ also too sharp, edit also takes longer time... sad.gif
*
Hmmm. Haven't tried 'too sharp' lens before. 'not sharp' got try before la. laugh.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:42 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(Ah hao @ Mar 5 2011, 11:40 AM)
can recommend me a filter ? i don know anything about filter, wat i wan is when take nite shot, the light will bcome star smile.gif

around how much ?

sony nex 1855, is 55mm or ??

sorry for the noob tongue.gif
*
Buy star filter then. Check yr 1855 lens, I think its 49mm. Or maybe 55mm

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...&hl=star+filter <<This is not the best one, I just randomly take one to show you the price of star filter.
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 11:44 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(cassplayer @ Mar 5 2011, 11:43 AM)
1090 for the flash + 10 for stofen diffuser from mitmvec biggrin.gif
*
Ehh? I tot his F58 is 1k? hmm.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 01:43 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(albnok @ Mar 5 2011, 12:42 PM)
Newbieeeeee: The Tamron 90mm F2.8 has a MFD of 29cm with a working distance of 11cm, and the Tamron 60mm F2.0 has a MFD of 23cm with a working distance of 10cm.

That makes me prefer the 60mm because it is brighter - but it is APS-C only. Notice that it's the APS-C version of the Tamron 90mm F2.8 which was meant for FF.

Note that the Tamrons have a short working distance compared to OEM lenses in a similiar range (Google them.)

*
Hmmm.. I haven't seen anyone selling the sp60 before. Is the sp90 suitable for portrait shots? Should be alright right? if get the sp90, 50mmf1.8 would be useless? hmm.gif





Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 01:47 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(kysham @ Mar 5 2011, 12:48 PM)
I am not sure I can concentrate well enough to see which camera has less noise at high ISO.... laugh.gif
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif tongue.gif

Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 02:48 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(eddybeh @ Mar 5 2011, 02:06 PM)
newbieeeeee: sp60 is quite a new macro lens. supposedly i won 1 but then they gave me nikon mount, when i request for a change, they don have a-mount in malaysia. sp90 can b used as a portrait lens n macro lens, my 2 cents as i use it for both of this. 50mm on apsc would be better for portrait shooting, sp90 is a little tight for portrait on apsc to me.
*
Hmm I see. Thanks bro! notworthy.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Mar 5 2011, 02:55 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


Aiyyyoooh. Under alot of pressure. Apparently theres no OP in my cousin's wedding. So I'm the OP! Wtf. vmad.gif

1st time snapping for wedding and I'm the OP. doh.gif

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0648sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 10:56 PM