QUOTE(RahXeph0n @ Feb 21 2011, 11:27 AM)
I hope you're being sarcastic hahaha. The engines are still from the same GEMA build (in case you didn't know, both forte 2.0 and inspira 2.0 use the same engine basically), the new 6 speed gear ratios is probably like other auto transmissions that are more than 4 speed = the extra gears only affect highway driving for increased fuel efficiency, the first 4 are hardly changed (although I'm sure they are changed slightly). Overall, the difference will be minimal if any.
It would help to say it's "my opinion" or "I think" or "from my observation" or "what I feel". Currently you're talking like it's a fact, which can confuse people, hence the asking for source. Your comparison of cars based on your experience are of older cars. Proton is under a new management now. Things MAY be different, and I say MAY. I don't know for sure, but neither do you right? Heck, Proton ICare even started calling up inspira oners personally to check on their cars... Isn't that telling you something?
There's a difference between being analytic, critical, pessimistic and cynical. I don't suggest that everyone heap praise on the Inspira, but it's painfully obvious which category you fall into.
Ok.... So, you want facts :
1. why would Proton have to test out so many suspension systems in the first place?
2. why there's >20 companies supplying parts to Proton? And the quality of the parts varies?
3. why other car makers are making profit last year but not Proton?
4. ICare called to ask is there any problem. But then when there's problem, can they solve it? The only answer is "sir, you have to wait, wait and wait.". This is telling me that, they are testing my blood pressure.
5. The fact of Inspira has the PDI and it stated PDI OK. But again, there's still problems here and there.
6. Indeed new management want to make some changes, but then did the front liners changed? Did the attitude changed?