Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
13 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
celciuz
post Jan 31 2011, 02:16 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
o_O Interesting, I never noticed any noise when my D700 does sensor cleaning. It is louder than the sound generated by VR?
celciuz
post Jan 31 2011, 02:42 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Dry box don't use a lot of electricity. Its like 5W or something only.
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 09:29 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 1 2011, 09:24 AM)
Do you have speedlight ?
Pay peanuts, get notty monkeys brows.gif
tongue.gif
As you can say SWM = motor. Go read more regarding AF-D lens and AF-S lens
You will know why AF-S 50mm can lock almost instantly while AF-D might hunt !
*
Correct, the AF-S might be slower but its more accurate. The 85mm behaves this way. The 1.4D versus 1.4G that is. The 1.4D is faster, but hunts more and not as accurate.
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 09:34 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 1 2011, 09:31 AM)
go try AiS... see faster or not LOL
*
No thanks tongue.gif. Don't like any of them.
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 09:47 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(fubs @ Feb 1 2011, 09:45 AM)
50mm 1.4 ai-s makes a good video lens biggrin.gif smooooth focus ring
*
My D700 no video cry.gif
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 09:55 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 1 2011, 09:51 AM)
My D700 oso no video, but i  thumbup.gif
*
No video that's why not interested in the 50 f/1.4 Ai-s just for the smooth focusing ring as mentioned by fubs. thumbup.gif
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 11:28 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 1 2011, 11:19 AM)
Did the AF assist lamp fired? Try turn off the AF Assit lamp and try again?

At aperture f/1.4, slight movement (not noticeable) will also move the focus depth/plane. The DOF is very shallow, and also depend on your distance.
16-85 have smaller aperture.

Try shooting at f/2 or f/2.8? Shoot closer to your subject and re-check. If you have a Nikon DSLR friend, try mount the lens on his/her camera and you try it then let your friend try it.
*
Not that critical actually, I focus and recompose with my 85 f/1.4G.

AF is still more or less there. Should be even easier with a 50mm.
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 11:41 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
^ If you talking about far subject it back focus right?

That one are you using your center AF? or using the sides?
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 12:01 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Feb 1 2011, 11:58 AM)
If I use spot metering, let's say I use middle point to focus at the eyes, then recompose, the mid point went to somewhere darker, so eventually the pic will b overexposed right?
*
In that case, you set for when you half press it does AF lock and AE lock. Then metering won't change as you recompose.
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 12:15 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Feb 1 2011, 12:07 PM)
I see.... using the AF&AE lock button when the focus locks on? Then recompose n click the shutter to capture only?
*
I forgot how is it by default haha. I usually configure if I really need to do that it will AE-L when I half press.


Added on February 1, 2011, 12:16 pm
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Feb 1 2011, 12:07 PM)
I see.... using the AF&AE lock button when the focus locks on? Then recompose n click the shutter to capture only?

Haha.... Then 39 or 51 AF point oso useless, juz for show only lor  doh.gif
*
Got, the 51AF points to be used when you need precise location where to focus especially for sports. Still shoot with single point, but its more flexible than just the 11 fixed points. You can use the points in between and all without recomposing.

This post has been edited by celciuz: Feb 1 2011, 12:16 PM
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 04:29 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Melaka selling for RM4400, 8GB + Bag. I think you should be able to press further.
celciuz
post Feb 1 2011, 05:45 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 1 2011, 05:16 PM)
ND user posted image
I'm looking for ND 8 laugh.gif
*
That's a GND and not a ND right?
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 10:08 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(chiahau @ Feb 2 2011, 09:42 AM)
Then your 28-70 also daddee's one?

Celciuz powder de. He sell butt get de ma XP

JkJk  laugh.gif  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
*
doh.gif

You go sell la then can also buy D3s + trinity + 85 + 200 etc etc. laugh.gif
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 11:51 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 2 2011, 11:24 AM)
Bokeh? I wonder how is the bokeh on 18-70.
can share some?
aye sifu CY!  notworthy.gif
doh.gif
Well. it is misleading actually. not because of prime you don't need to care about focusing speed. but because of its purpose.
since what we mention earlier was 50mm. which it's purpose is for portraiture focusing speed is actually not a necessity in this case.

however if we do talk about 200mm prime or above which meant for sport. focusing speed take a big part.
as I know from ken rock well website.
most of the sport photographer jump ship to canon on 70s/80s because Nikon focusing motor has a flaw.

and again those sport photographer didn' jump ship back to nikon because Canon and Nikon is compareable nowadays.
Therefore they have no reason to sell all their gears and jump ship.
Grats for your first gold ring.
*
Look deeper and you might be surprised, and kenrockwell isn't everything.
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 12:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 2 2011, 12:20 PM)
18-55 pawned 18-105 in term of IQ? You mean the 18-55 kit lens of D3100? shocking.gif
Thanks for the head up. I almost forgot Youtube these days provides good resources for information and tutorial too tongue.gif

Again, the 18-55 of D3100 better off compared with the 18-105 of D90 and D7000?

As for the flash gun, I know it'll do wonders in photography but at my current budget, I gotta wait for the next phase of my expenditure. Hopefully within 6 ~ 12 months I would manage to get myself both the flash gun and a prime lens smile.gif
*
I read before too, the 18-55 has better optics than 18-105. But I don't have experience with the 18-55.
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 12:49 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I tried friend's new D300s + 1685 last weekend. Just so so only...
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 12:53 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Hmm, both I guess. It is inside a shopping mall, indoor condition. Lens quite sharp wide open (not exactly 'wide' since its like f/3.5-f/5.6).

But need to bump up ISO quite a lot, and D300s ISO is just ok ok... pushing it to ISO1600 then :S. Have to use flash lo.
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 01:25 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 2 2011, 01:21 PM)
opss.. okay it is fact. tongue.gif
if you do video go for VR lens. as the VR will be very helpful if you do photo shot only. non VR ok lor. yeah that's what people said 1855>18105 in IQ-wise
oppss.. okay it's the fact.
how about some bokeh picture from your 1870? care to share?
that's what I know as well
bro CY
I have question.
if let say I found my camera has a good ISO control.
as it doesn't show any noise at ISO 3200.
what makes I need to use ISO 100?

for example I can shoot something with 1/200s shutter 3200 ISO. which is convenient.
in what situation I shouldn't bump my ISO into ISO 3200 instead lower it down into ISO 100/200 with 1/20s shutter speed which is less convenient.

Knowing ISO 3200 doesn't give me noise.
will that make difference?


Added on February 2, 2011, 1:22 pm
do you think this thing need a fast AF speed? http://www.nikon.com.my/productitem.php?pid=1400-492a78c3f0
*
How to answer you? Just adjust accordingly.

ISO as low as possible, adjust aperture according to DOF you need, adjust shutter according to what your hand can handle or how fast the subject you shooting require.
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 01:26 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Feb 2 2011, 01:25 PM)
Bro i mean compare to same focal length -.-"  sweat.gif  sweat.gif  sweat.gif

Of course need fast AF speed , but what i mean is dont have to care so much about the AF speed between nikkor 50mm and sigma 50mm.

Lol i got poor english , i dunnoe how to explain well.
*
To me, what's important for such prime lens is the accuracy of the AF. If focuses fast but inaccurate also no point. I prefer it focuses slower but once it locks it is spot on.

1.4D versus 1.4G kinda situation.
celciuz
post Feb 2 2011, 01:56 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Because there's no such camera that has no differences between ISO200 versus ISO3200.

13 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0524sec    0.63    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 07:09 AM