i never have thoughts that photography is something that is easy to learn. It is a delicate art of its own which requires years of practise hardwork and perserverance to achieve the final result. It's easy for a layperson to say... Well he got expensive dslr and gears to produce such picture. But believe me, any good photographers, they have put in so much thoughts in their work, to produce the best combination of light, composition, feel and more. It takes a lot of sacrifice to get the results you want. Not as easy as one thinks.
I can't say that gears are not important. For anyone who are serious to learn up photography, a decent DSLR or an SLR in the old days has become a de facto standard, as it allows the user to be able to go manual, at least for like 10 years ago. Nowadays, anyone can also go for manual on prosumer pns... and can be a good camera to learn as well..
To me the same question still remains. Will the gears improve my photography? Well, the answer can be yes in some aspects. I can get very good creamy bokeh. IQ very good that it produce some outstanding results. But then, am i keep thinking about gears to solve some of the camera limitation that i may have missed out certain areas of photography that i have missed out with current gears. Owning a new gear sure is nice. But being able to pick up a new skill to be added to your creative toolbox is equally as satisfying.
This post has been edited by geekster129: Jan 10 2011, 07:06 PM
Photography vs Gear?, the meaning of photography
Jan 10 2011, 06:38 PM
Quote
0.0160sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled