QUOTE(sinoffire @ Jan 25 2011, 05:43 PM)
like u said. if the club knows that someone better is ahead of that youngster, why bother bringing 'em over at the 1st place when they're young? their progress will onli be dented by lack of 1st team action. all these kinda of stocking young players without playing 'em sometimes really irritates me, even i'm a fan of mu. buy when they're young, sell when not performing/not upto club's standard. wtf mang? seriously. see manucho + Dong + david bellion for starters. i'm seriously casting my doubts over those coaches/scouts that prompted saf/gill in getting 'em in at the 1st place. mark my words, the diouf fler currently on loan at rovers will be gone, just the matter of time. i just dun see him playing for us in the near future.
now dun gimme crap about some players are meant for backup/rotation and not 1st team materials. that's utter bollox.
just look at those clubs that frank arnesan (spell?) been to. how many of those youngsters that he brought in actually plying their trade in those teams?? i'd say none.
*took off the jewtube link. easier loading
*
Read Wan's post back. Read carefully.now dun gimme crap about some players are meant for backup/rotation and not 1st team materials. that's utter bollox.
just look at those clubs that frank arnesan (spell?) been to. how many of those youngsters that he brought in actually plying their trade in those teams?? i'd say none.
*took off the jewtube link. easier loading
With kids, it is like a lottery. You'll never know. Can anyone tell me that Ronaldo will win BPITW award back then? Or even being an integral part of Man Utd? None! All I know that, most of us were criticizing him for being one trick pony. With kids, you'll need patience and time in order to groom them.
Same can be said with Class of 92. No one knows that they will turn up great. FYI, this is the policy of the club. To spot and groom talents.
Added on January 25, 2011, 5:58 pm
QUOTE(Pain_X @ Jan 25 2011, 05:50 PM)
But think about it,we already have so many potentially great youngsters among our ranks. Its true that it doesnt hurt to go get all the best youngsters in the world and out of that bunch,at least a few will make it. Besides,we're talking about a fee around 10 million pounds here.. I havent watched a single game of this chamberlain guy and i dont wanna see youtube videos to judge him,but 10 million for a 17 year old is veryyy hefty. In a way its good to snatch youngsters away from our rivals,i'd like to see all our young players prosper too,but the fee just seems a little too high for a 17 year old kid who hasnt proven anything yet.
Im still on the fence with this one,but its true that if there's an opportunity to get a talented kid who's also wanted by our rivals,its definitely better if sign him. My only issue is the price tag.
EDIT : Oh sorry,2 issues. The second one being his position in the team. If he's not really needed and we already have cover/young players making a mark in that position,then why sign him..? Im talking about Cleverly who's showing his class at the moment.
He has been with the academy since young. We signed him before we even signed Hargreaves, Anderson or Carrick for that matter.Im still on the fence with this one,but its true that if there's an opportunity to get a talented kid who's also wanted by our rivals,its definitely better if sign him. My only issue is the price tag.
EDIT : Oh sorry,2 issues. The second one being his position in the team. If he's not really needed and we already have cover/young players making a mark in that position,then why sign him..? Im talking about Cleverly who's showing his class at the moment.
This post has been edited by boxsystem: Jan 25 2011, 05:58 PM
Jan 25 2011, 05:56 PM

Quote
0.0473sec
1.23
7 queries
GZIP Disabled