seems u not doing homework saying that u r not serious.

Base on my study for current existing nearby condo, including condo for future 3 years time, i would not worry about the potential buyers or even rental.

about neighbourhood, z residence and jalil max project would be great challenge. however, bukit oug is old condo yet selling for high price.

though z residence is 1000 units but with the location and future LRT, sure BBB. hopefully selling price would be lower than kiara...

kiara sucess is not like wat u think so surface. in fact, i seems projects with zero entry cost but with very low purchase rate. on other hand, good project would be sapu like beli sayur even there is no discount. yr statement is only correct for those looking for a home but not for investor coz they r looking for long term gain.

kiara last week booking is mostly done by internal staff n developer friends, but not ready open for public yet the occupancy is almost full. this group of ppl is confident with the development.

i have no idea as im not one of thier staff. anyway, i dun evaluate a property from the purchase rate but only believe my own study.

sierra only with 2 blocks. but kiara with 4 seperated blocks n each unit with corner lot design. kiara is more nicer in terms of facade n design. but colour is close with sierra.

i dun know y u said sierra is a delay project. for yr info, sierra appreciation is more than 100%.

since u had paid 3% to lawyer/developer, u are not allow to transfer name unless u have bank loan reject letter to get back yr 3% deposit, yet yr name is still not transferable and the unit will open for public again. this is to avoid ppl hoding unit just to gain cash.

dont think is a qualified agent, guess done by competitor. sqft and even land status is wrong.

haha...bukit oug with 1000+ units u said is super high density. parklane with 4000+ units is what?

you only benchmark on current neighbourhood, which refer to bukit oug. you have no idea what is the development in 3 to 5 years time. anyway, for your infomation, tanents in bukit oug is not low income as the rental there is quite high.

your claim is only base on your own perception. low income group of ppl would not spend more than 1k for monthly rental n this is data proven. unless you are saying about own stay, refering those onwer bought the condo years ago. but we always value a condo from current market, where bukit oug gives high rental n selling price, which comparable with other condo.

agree on the "feeling" that you mentioned. i will only consider about "feeling" for own stay. but defenitely no for investment. when we talk about investment, we need refer to data.

we had switched the topic from whether bukit oug is low income tanents (answer is no) to investment opportunity.

in terms of capital gain, from the current market price, it has room to grow if compared with current existing new launch.

in terms of rental, it is almost as high as other condo, but will face challenge from other nearby new projects that completed in future.

u r refering to kiara 2 but not kiara 1. kiara 1 facing high way or Rainz/bukit oug. same thing goes to Z residence and Rainz.

This post has been edited by mature: May 21 2011, 08:14 AM