Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 TV specs to ignore, Tips for Christmas Shopping

views
     
TSvikashshah
post Dec 22 2010, 10:32 AM, updated 15y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


A good article to share with fellow Forumers...

TV specs to ignore
By David Katzmaier, CNET.com
Dec 21, 2010
Today's HDTV spec sheets are littered with confusing information, and much of it is worthless. Here we present the major offenders and recommend you simply ignore these specs when making your purchase decision. Manufacturers include most of this information in an attempt to convey improved picture quality by citing ever-higher numbers; however, in reality those numbers provide little indication of how good the image looks in the real world.

Refresh rate (50Hz, 100Hz, 200Hz, 400Hz, 600Hz)
These numbers, which are supposed to refer to the number of times the still image is refreshed on the screen (50Hz = 50 times per second), have proliferated in the last few years. That's because LCD TVs have a reputation for being blurrier in fast-motion scenes compared with plasma TVs. However, in reality, most people can't perceive that fuzziness in most material; in terms of motion blur, it's nearly impossible to see the difference between a 50Hz and a 600Hz TV. Many LCD TV manufacturers incorporate dejudder or smoothing processing in conjunction with refresh rate, but smoothing and antiblur are two separate, albeit related, visual effects. 240Hz: What you need to know has the full explanation.

Resolution (720p, 1080p)
Nearly every TV today is a 1080p model, but in the smaller LCD screen sizes and entry-level plasma series you can still find 720p models. There's nothing wrong with 720p resolution. In fact, the difference between 720p and 1080p resolutions is nearly impossible to discern, even when watching content on very large screen sizes. Check out HDTV resolution explained for more details.

Contrast ratio (up to 10 million:1, "Infinite")
Contrast ratio refers to the difference between the brightest white and the darkest black a TV can display, which is an important indicator of overall picture quality. Unfortunately, there's no standardized way to measure it, so most TV makers essentially make it up. Sometimes differences in contrast ratio among a single manufacturer's own product line can be a true indicator of black-level performance--the crucial capability of a TV to produce a shade of "black" as close as possible to the absence of light--but just as often they can be concocted to justify higher price points. That's why we call contrast ratio the Dr. Evil of HDTV specs.

Viewing angle
Ideally you want the TV's image to stay as bright and as colorful when seen from the side, or from above and below, as from straight on. With LCD that almost never happens, despite viewing-angle claims that approach 180 degrees. The rule of thumb here is that LCD and LED viewing angles are always worse than the angles on plasma TVs, and though different LCDs can have different characteristics, this spec isn't a trustworthy indicator. That said, LCDs typically have adequate viewing angles for most viewers, especially in bright rooms.

Wide color gamut
Color standards for content production are strict, and matching those standards, to most accurately reproduce the source material, is the main color-related responsibility of the TV. Wide color gamuts and other color-related extras can produce "redder" reds or punchier yellows, for example, but those colors won't be accurate. On the other hand, many TVs can also deliver relatively accurate color in certain picture settings, regardless of their color specifications or claims.

Energy Star
There's rarely a number associated with Energy Star specifications, but we're including it here to prove a point: Nearly every TV available for sale today qualifies for Energy Star, making the certification useless for comparative purposes.


Source:
http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/home_av/tvs/0...62205280,00.htm
TSvikashshah
post Dec 22 2010, 12:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(yamesh7 @ Dec 22 2010, 11:54 AM)
can lcd or led tv used as monitor for my pc..? any suggestion or comments?
*
Easy Method:
Can...as long as you have HDMI on your PC, and HDMI on your TV.
Its easier if u are using Win 7 then other OS.

More tedious ( if no HDMI ):
DVI out ( if no DVI input on the TV buy a DVI to VGA converter ) , and then channel sound using Line Out or Headphone Jack - u need some sound cables
If you are not looking at connecting sound, it is even more easier.

This post has been edited by vikashshah: Dec 22 2010, 12:00 PM
TSvikashshah
post Dec 22 2010, 02:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 22 2010, 11:02 AM)
This one easy. Ada duit LED, kurang duit LCD. Both works just fine. LED is a actually too bright for prolonged viewing. Nicer blacks...but you need to pay extra RM1K++ for equivalent size.

IMO, is good time to buy LCD now, coz it'll be phased out for LED....can get 40" for rock bottom 1.8k....i just bought a Sharp 40" LCD for RM 1.9k

Just to add to the above article:
The 100Hz thingy is worth the money when it works. Best i saw is Philips HD Natural motion, Sharp's new LED 100Hz and Sony's Motionflow. Those korean 100Hz not really can use....
*
True true...Sharp 40" 1.9k is damn good lo smile.gif thumbup.gif

Panasonic 100Hz seems ok so far...dunno la bro...sometimes can't tell the difference...maybe my analog astro...waiting for beyond to arrive smile.gif he he...


Added on December 22, 2010, 2:30 pm
QUOTE(camrycilver @ Dec 22 2010, 02:09 PM)
good tips, bro vikashshah thumbup.gif
*
The pleasure is all mine bro. Tks.

This post has been edited by vikashshah: Dec 22 2010, 02:30 PM
TSvikashshah
post Dec 22 2010, 03:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(bigbangformula @ Dec 22 2010, 02:51 PM)
How about Panasonic 42'' LCD for around RM2399,good deal?
*
Good...IPS and protective screen...prefer that one to the samsung 40".
Plus service and parts - among the best...

Panasonic is a safe buy in my opinion.

Panasonic natural colors, Samsung maybe a lil more vivid...others have their + and -...

But finally, u must like it...thats all that matters...

If kinds around, prefer Panasonic- got protection....


Added on December 22, 2010, 3:09 pm
QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 22 2010, 03:03 PM)
Exactly. No difference. This goes for my old Sharp 32" LCD as well. Whether watch SD or HD also no difference. That's why i only mentioned the 3 above. Samsung and LG 100Hz doesn't makes much difference either. But those 3 above, can see ultra smooth...like playing games at constant 60 fps...lol.

btw, your WDTV Live still not arriving yet?? smile.gif
*
Bro...ha ha...waiting for Poslaju fellow smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif
Hopefully all goes smooth today...

God Bless smile.gif))

I must check out those 3 brands...meaning their imaging engine are quite good.
Next trip to the mall...will do.

Btw, I managed to get the Asus adapter from KL...LYN forumer...i will use that for the WDTV.
DWA140 on the server
Router somewhere in the middle. smile.gif

Yesterday, i did all that u said...and got 2.5MB/s....now full Draft-N and the Belkin is AP with G smile.gif
Kicked the 3rd class citizens tongue.gif

Hopefully when i change the position, will get at least 4MB/s - signal will be stronger.

Will keep you updated smile.gif Tks bro.

This post has been edited by vikashshah: Dec 22 2010, 03:09 PM
TSvikashshah
post Dec 22 2010, 07:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 22 2010, 03:24 PM)
Good luck. I have further tested the ASUS N-13 the other day, connecting a laptop nearby the WDTV Live, got about 35Mbps to 39Mbps based on the test done by Passmark, looseley translate to 4.xx MB/s. I think most 1080p mkv files is like 10Mbps++ bit rate only, should be enough most of the time. BluRay max bit rate is 40 Mbps uncompressed i think. So unless you are streaming BD iso, i think it should works 99.99% of the time.

On oh, setting the AP to '40Mhz' actually gives me worst result...now i just set it to 'Auto'.
*
Wow...4.xx MB/s is really good for remote to remote. After doing what you said, i managed to stream 720p remote to remote (no wires) with no problems. At that time was 2.2MB/s. 1080 still had pixelations. Keeping fingers crossed. Poslaju fellow didn't turn up. Tracking system said already "Attempting Delivery"...its weird !!! Welll...maybe tomorrow then. I hope so.
Nope no plans of BD ISO...only decent mkv. Just got Avatar 1080p 16.3G...

I noticed, that as we download stuff from the net, the MB/s is kinda effected. Do u feel the same to? This is for remote to remote...no wired connection.


Bro, oh no, 40MHz...i heard somewhere...it may or may not help.... i am at auto mode...and it transmits at 28MHz smile.gif

TSvikashshah
post Dec 23 2010, 08:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(ronaldkwok @ Dec 23 2010, 06:50 AM)
Hi bro, you beat me to it. I was preparing my latest post in my HDTV Blog when I saw your thread but it is good to share. It is partly based on cnet plus other sources from the net to make it clearer. Anyway, it is for beginners only and not for all the sifus out here.  blush.gif
*
Hi bro, good write up on your blog. Yes, i too am a beginner, hence i thought this article was worth the share. Lots of mambo jumbo out there regarding which is the best TV to buy.
smile.gif Tks bro.
TSvikashshah
post Dec 23 2010, 09:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 23 2010, 09:23 AM)
I play the same 1080p movie on my HDReady 32" Sharp and then my FullHD 40"....immediately can tell the difference already. There's so much more kedut and dots on the people's face... tongue.gif

Ronald: Nice Blog.  thumbup.gif I wanna write one on setup entire streaming server to WDTV Live and XBOX etc..to connecting your amp..etc....but always too freaking lazy to go about it....maybe soon hopefully.
*
Bro, i am so looking forward for this smile.gif It'll be really helpful for everyone. Totally !!! smile.gif
TSvikashshah
post Dec 23 2010, 02:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


dariofoo, glad it helped...thx bro.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.71    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 01:27 PM