Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V2, gold ring or f/2.8 and bigger !

views
     
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 09:58 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(kiroz @ Dec 21 2010, 09:54 AM)
Any razor sharp lens for portrait shots? I'm kinda unsatisfied with not-so-sharp kit lens (18-105mm) of mine on D90. Any recommendation and RRP?
*
razor sharp portrait lens

85mm f/1.4G - RM 4.6k
70-200 VRII - RM 6.8k
135mm f/2DC - RM 4.5k
200mm f/2. - RM 16k


Added on December 21, 2010, 10:10 am
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Dec 21 2010, 09:57 AM)
can suggest me ani good & cheap walk around lens...?
might target one for my gf's combination...
current in mind is 18-70...
see if ani good lens wif VR or VC or something...
*
VR and VC a must meh ? Before VR or VC invented, those people no need take photos already ah ? laugh.gif
18-70 is good. 16-85 better. 17-55 even better tongue.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Dec 21 2010, 10:10 AM
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 10:31 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(kiroz @ Dec 21 2010, 10:19 AM)
If 50mm f/1.8d versus 35mm f/1.8g, which one is better for d90?
85mm f/1.4G - RM 4.6k
70-200 VRII - RM 6.8k
135mm f/2DC - RM 4.5k
200mm f/2. - RM 16k

Is there any 3rd party equivalent lenses that costs cheaper than these? I broke already... tongue.gif
*
Budget ? personally feel 35mm f/1.8G isn't good.

TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:00 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 21 2010, 10:54 AM)
35mm is good, but the length perhaps? so can't get so nice shallow deph of field=.=
*
I mean that AF-S 35mm f/1.8G isn't good la. Read properly. tongue.gif
35mm f/2D is way better since he on D90, can use AFD lens ma.
For 35mm range, either f/1.4G or f/2D. f/1.8G is for those without AF motor on body smile.gif

Not so nice DOF ? Sure bo ? tongue.gif
user posted image


This post has been edited by KTCY: Dec 21 2010, 11:05 AM
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:03 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:01 AM)
3rd party equivalent,

50mm Sigma F/1.4 ( RM2200 )
85mm Sigma F/1.4 ( Rm3800 )

OR

Nikon 85 f/1.4D ( New is RM3500, 2nd hand probably around Rm3000)
*
Add in Sigma 30mm f/1.4 - RM 1.8k IIRC
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:08 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
24mm f/1.4G can shoot portrait meh ? sleep.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:14 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 21 2010, 11:09 AM)
How can you compare 35mm with 50mm. The angle of view is different. It does different things. Like apples to oranges.

There are no equivalents. If you wanna play, you gotta pay.


Added on December 21, 2010, 11:10 am

Why not?
*
The way you listed macam anything wider than 50mm can't shoot portrait ma tongue.gif

QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:10 AM)
i tried out the sigma 50mm 1.4 already ...

its bokeh is really    drool.gif
*
9 blade with 77mm flex.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:16 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(zstan @ Dec 21 2010, 11:12 AM)
why not? just go very very very close to model only ma~ icon_idea.gif
*
No need very close la. Composition with the background. I shoot portrait with 11mm tongue.gif
user posted image


Added on December 21, 2010, 11:17 am
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Dec 21 2010, 11:16 AM)
my gf newbie...
if got vc or br better lar...
18-70 still ok lar for d price...
16-85 to 17-55 is nono adi...
prefer price around 18-70 there lar...
Rm700+- for a used one...
d lower d better...
*
I got 18-70 for RM 4xx only laugh.gif
Super bloody cheap that I can sell at higher price in future laugh.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Dec 21 2010, 11:17 AM
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:31 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:22 AM)
Can explain more how the 35mm F2D is better den 1.8G?? Hmm... I dunno much, F2D sharper at F2 compared to 1.8G?? I juz know the F2D can focus real close only  flex.gif
*
f/1.8 and f/2d basically MFD same. Just that f/2d sharp even on f/2 while I try out f/1.8G, soft even at f/2.8 sweat.gif

QUOTE(iloveOov @ Dec 21 2010, 11:29 AM)
CY you know she @@...wish her dream come true and shoot she again hehe...
*
HER not SHE sleep.gif doh.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:35 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:34 AM)
GOt or not..... soft at 2.8 =.= den mayb I really haven try the F2D b4, gotta got BTS try out n see.....
*
Idk. Maybe I'm too pixel peeper tongue.gif
I am a full time prime user for 2-3 years tongue.gif

QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 21 2010, 11:34 AM)
Thats cos its was a noob question... and the standard answer has always been a fast telephoto.
*
tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:39 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:36 AM)
I cannot spot any 35mm F/2 at BTS, i went there the other day to test out other lenses  tongue.gif
*
IIRC, don't have as this is quite a rare lens.
I have 1 brand new unit at my friend place to let go tongue.gif

QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:37 AM)
Hahaa..... dammn, feel like selling off the 35mm n get the sigma 50mm  tongue.gif  my 1.8G can't do much =.=
*
User problems then blame lens ah ? laugh.gif
Learn the limitation. I sold my 50/1.4 and full time on 35mm/2 and 70200/2.8 tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:40 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:38 AM)
35mm is useless on crop for me, I get the sigma 50mm anytime, way better in terms of bokeh, colour and sharpness  tongue.gif
*
I sold mine for 35mm laugh.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:41 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 21 2010, 11:40 AM)
Ew.. is that true bro? 35mm f/1.8 can't do much? I am about to buy it in next week. now you making me consider it again.  rclxub.gif
*
It can makes wonder. And you're on D3100. Not much choice to choose smile.gif


Added on December 21, 2010, 11:42 am
QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 21 2010, 11:41 AM)
And the neverending search for the "perfect" lens continues...
*
which is actually cause by the owner itself tongue.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Dec 21 2010, 11:42 AM
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:45 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:42 AM)
85 f/1.8 handling is very weird on big camera like D700, for me i can spot the colour difference compared to 1.4D... 1.8D is like missing something, not to mention the focus ring keep turning everytime u AF  doh.gif ..
*
Owned 2 x 85mm before.
And yes I sold it off tongue.gif
You know the reason !

QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:43 AM)
No la.... the composition a bit wide to b a designated single person portrait, I like the 50mm length after i use my 17-50, n keep full zoom at 50mm for portrait shocking.gif  den very seldom use da 35mm jor  icon_question.gif not to say the outcome not nice la, when i say the quality of 35mm not good I oso don't feel so, jz I prefer 50mm in composing a portrat  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
You need 85mm or 135mm for portrait. 50mm is nothing also
Nowadays I use 70200 for portrait tongue.gif

QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:44 AM)
Well it's personal preference really, i just don't like the 35mm on crop, same as 50mm on FF(that's why i am getting a 85 1.4 to replace it, hopefully soon  tongue.gif  )
*
Replacing mine with 24mm soon tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 11:54 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(ReeNz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:50 AM)
Well, in my own experience, i found 35mm 1.8G was very sharp wide open, at least for my copy..and in US G version is more popular than the D version. the only problem i had with my previous 1.8G is persistant backfocusing problem. after sending to Nikon it came back front focusing so i sold it. comparing to 50mm 1.8D, my 35mm 1.8G is way sharper. but i have no experience with 35mm D. here are some sample photos i took at f1.8, direct convertion from raw to jpeg

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
To spoil your fun, I view it Original size at your flickr. The sharpness is not there.
user posted image

The eyes, look at it. It's soft.

TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 01:42 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 21 2010, 11:57 AM)
KYCY I have out of topic question. well I am wondering have you ever use 3rd party lens on your nikon body? since you are a very big fan of Nikon original lenses instead of using 3rd party lenses.
do you found it fascinating?
*
I did. Tokina 11-16 was on my camera body before this.

QUOTE(ReeNz @ Dec 21 2010, 12:02 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

tongue.gif  Well maybe i didnt pixel peep that one..but what about this one..and i had no experience with 35mm D, just comparing to 50mm 1.8  biggrin.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


and as i mentioned i found my lens focusing is unreliable..the first shot of that guy came out like this..so no more 35mm 1.8G for me  blush.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I take that you focus on the middle lady's eyes. Looks good but not the best yet. A little soft still laugh.gif

See this original size and you will know what I mean tongue.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



QUOTE(mrl @ Dec 21 2010, 12:12 PM)
recent trip to Penang Botanical Garden

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


over spammed... tongue.gif

spoiler-ed for certain ppl's good...
*
Over vignette

QUOTE(iloveOov @ Dec 21 2010, 12:21 PM)
Shanny Shanny >.<

user posted image
*
Right hand chop tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 01:51 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 01:49 PM)
Wow , rich, 24mm f/1.4g, nice lens  brows.gif ...currently on 24-70 + 70-200, need a prime  cry.gif
*
I need your pro street walker. Around 500 right ?
Prime ? 200mm f/2 whistling.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 02:10 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Some other photo mate. I randomly remove the photos because 1 post can only have 10 photos smile.gif
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 02:17 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(ReeNz @ Dec 21 2010, 02:14 PM)
I was using single point actually, never use auto area..i took around 500+ pictures dat day, around 100+ were backfocused..at one point, i took the same pic of a person several times and all of them (around 4-5 times) were backfocused..that made me realized sumthing was wrong and then i checked all the pics i took dat day and i found out the prob.. didnt realized it at fisrt coz not so obvious on the camera's lcd
Haha I agree, more sharpness need to spend more i guess  tongue.gif  maybe I will try 35mm f/2 in the near future and see how do i like it..
*
I think, is not regarding the back focus and etc. You're shooting at f/1.8 even 3 person. How to get everyone sharp ? Basically, the photos were OOF for the 2 person besides.
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 02:34 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 21 2010, 02:31 PM)
guys. check this out I am using my 1855 VR lens.
pic taken during my office trip in Taman Pertanian Malaysia
I found it okay and my skill slightly better tongue.gif
because previously I couldn't get those bokeh, hehe..
remind me of one of my posting
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

user posted image
C&C highly appreciated.

Now I am happy I can do bokeh with my kit lens ady.  rclxm9.gif
*
Zoom at 55mm, MFD sleep.gif
and with biggest aperture f/5.6 sleep.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Dec 21 2010, 02:35 PM
TSKTCY
post Dec 21 2010, 02:42 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 21 2010, 02:37 PM)
shouldn't I do that? or something? Please tell me specifically.
*
yes. that's the trick biggrin.gif

7 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0464sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 11:52 AM