hey , bros , dun nid to start a fight for the PR or not to be PR matters.
All i asking is about the employer preference with PR or non-PR . other than that i dun wanna knw or i've ald knw.
QUOTE(seantang @ Jan 17 2011, 09:11 PM)
Why not?
Construction field... no idea. Finance... they will hire whoever can get the job done. The little bit of cost difference is not a concern.

totally disagree with u. when the HR interview someone with SAME qualification , how they knw which one can finish the task and who cannot.
and from other point of view. PR applying for 3k salary will require company to pay another portion of money for their CPF, while non-PR applying for 3k dun have to.
if that amount of money is small difference, i think everyone in the working line now can simply start asking their boss for increment
CPF is capped at 900 ie. 20% of a max salary of 4500. Any salary above 4500 is not subject to CPF. Anyway, I don't see an issue with being forced to save 900 per month, if I get a return of 675 per month (employer portion) - which is like 75% interest per month!
If PRs are not safe, what makes you think work pass holders are safer?
different ppl got different view .
my fren studying actuarial science , the professor done calculation on the CPF compare to the MYR u bring home if u non-PR。that would tell another story.
a agent from insurance company selling u a saving plan will tell u another story.
a boss uses his money to start business will tell another story and earn million . another story.
even my colleague (singaporean) is

50 - 51- 55- 60 . maybe after 30 years later , we have to wait till 70 years old then we eligible to take out the money

then we can use the $ to cure our sickness
oso like u said , u save such a big amount of money in a foreign country until u reach the age of 55+ (if u r lucky, the policy didnt change), whats make u think the money will be safer than u bring it home monthly
This post has been edited by kl87: Jan 18 2011, 08:09 PM